Home About us Contact | |||
Anorectal Physiology (anorectal + physiology)
Selected AbstractsStrategy for the surgical management of patients with idiopathic megarectum and megacolon,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 10 2001C. B. Ó Súilleabháin Background: Several surgical procedures have been used to treat idiopathic megabowel. A structured approach to the surgical management of megarectum/colon is reported. Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with megabowel referred for surgery were reviewed. All patients had conservative treatment for 6 months. Those failing to improve underwent full-thickness biopsy of the anorectal junction, anorectal physiology studies, colonic transit studies and evacuation proctography. Surgery involved excision of the abnormal large bowel and formation of an anastomosis (coloanal or ileoanal) using ,normal' bowel identified either by a defunctioning stoma or colonic motility studies. Results: Eight patients responded to conservative management. Two patients were lost to follow-up and one died from unrelated causes. Two of the 17 patients who underwent full-thickness biopsy were cured by the procedure. Anorectal physiology, colonic transit and evacuation studies did not aid selection of the surgical procedure performed in 15 patients: proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis (six), restorative proctocolectomy (three), panproctocolectomy (one) and defunctioning stoma (five). At a median follow-up of 3·6 years, 13 of 15 evaluable patients had a satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: Approximately 40 per cent of patients with megabowel referred for surgery responded to conservative treatment. The remaining patients may be treated successfully by surgery. The use of either a ,diagnostic' defunctioning stoma or colonic motility studies may aid in the choice of surgical procedure. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ,iceberg diagram'COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2006M. Pescatori Abstract Objective, Surgical treatment of constipation and obstructed defecation (OD) carries frequent recurrences, as OD is an ,iceberg syndrome' characterized by ,underwater rocks' or occult diseases which may affect the outcome of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate occult disorders in order to alert the clinician of these and minimize failures. Method, One hundred consecutive constipated patients with OD symptoms, 81 female patients, median age 52 years, underwent perineal examination, proctoscopy, anorectal manometry, and anal/vaginal ultrasound. Anorectal physiology and imaging tests were also carried out when indicated, as well as psychological and urogynaecological consultation. Symptoms were graded using a modified 1,20 constipation score. Both evident (e.g. rectocele) and occult (e.g. anismus) diseases were prospectively evaluated using a novel ,iceberg diagram'. The type of treatment, whether conservative or surgical, was also recorded. Results, Fifty-four (54%) patients had both mucosal prolapse and rectocele. All patients had at least two occult OD-related diseases, 66 patients had at least three: anxiety-depression, anismus and rectal hyposensation were the most frequent (66%, 44% and 33% respectively). The median constipation score was 11 (range 2,20), the median number of ,occult disorders' was 5 (range 2,8). Conservative treatment was carried out in most patients. Surgery was carried out in 14 (14%) patients. Conclusion, The novel ,iceberg diagram' allowed the adequate evaluation of OD-related occult diseases and better selection of patients for treatment. Most were managed conservatively, and only a minority were treated by surgery. [source] Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of idiopathic constipationBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 7 2002N. J. Kenefick Background: Constipation can usually be managed using conservative therapies. A proportion of patients require more intensive treatment. Surgery provides variable results. This paper describes an alternative approach, in which the neural control of the bowel and pelvic floor is modified, using permanent sacral nerve stimulation. Methods: Four women (aged 27,36 years), underwent temporary and then permanent stimulation. All had idiopathic constipation, resistant to maximal therapy, with symptoms for 8,32 years. Clinical evaluation, bowel diary, Wexner constipation score, symptom analogue score, quality of life questionnaire and anorectal physiology were completed. Results: There was a marked improvement in all patients with temporary, and in three with permanent, stimulation. Median follow-up was 8 (range 1,11) months. Bowel frequency increased from 1,6 to 6,28 evacuations per 3 weeks. Improvement occurred, at longest,follow,up, in median (range) evacuation score (4 (0,4) versus 1 (0,4)), time with abdominal pain (98 (95,100) versus 12 (0,100) per cent), time with bloating (100 (95,100) versus 12 (5,100) per cent), Wexner score (21 (20,22) versus 9 (1,20)), analogue score (22 (16,32) versus 80 (20,98)) and quality of life. Maximum anal resting and squeeze pressures increased. Rectal sensation was altered. Transit time normalized in one patient. Conclusion: Permanent sacral nerve stimulation can be used to treat patients with resistant idiopathic constipation. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Vertical reduction rectoplasty: a new treatment for idiopathic megarectumBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 9 2000Professor N. S. Williams Background The aetiology of idiopathic megarectum is unknown and the results of surgery are often unsatisfactory. Rectal hyposensation is common and poor perception of rectal filling may contribute to the poor evacuatory function. By reducing the capacity of the rectum, it was hypothesized that sensory thresholds to rectal distension and perception of urge to defaecate would be improved. Methods Vertical reduction rectoplasty (VRR) and concomitant sigmoid colectomy was performed on six patients with idiopathic megarectum. Patients were evaluated before and after operation by detailed questionnaire and anorectal physiology. Postoperative rectal compliance was also studied by means of a programmable electronic barostat. Where appropriate, physiological data were compared with those obtained in eight healthy volunteers. Results Bowel frequency increased from a preoperative median of 2·5 to 16 per month after operation. Four patients reported improved rectal perception of the urge to defaecate. Thresholds for defaecatory urge and maximum tolerated volume were significantly reduced following VRR (P < 0·05). Post-VRR rectal compliance was no different from that in healthy volunteers. Colonic transit time decreased significantly after VRR (P < 0·05) and evacuation on proctography increased from a median of 30 per cent to 50 per cent. At a median of 57 weeks' follow-up five of the six patients expressed continued satisfaction with the results. Conclusion VRR is a new approach to the treatment of idiopathic megarectum. Clinical and physiological studies confirm that it can improve sensory feedback and defaecation. The procedure needs further evaluation as the number of patients undergoing the procedure increases. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomyCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 4 2010A. D. Rink Abstract Objective, Restorative proctectomy with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ilealpouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are options for maintaining bowel integrity after rectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare clinical function and anorectal physiology in patients treated with CAA and IPAA. Method, Three-dimensional vector-manometry and neorectal volumetry were performed in straight CAA [53 patients (34 male)] and IPAA [61 patients (39 male)] for ulcerative colitis. Function was assessed using a 14 day incontinence diary. Results, Function was similar in both groups, but neorectal compliance and threshold volumes for sensation, urge and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) were significantly higher after IPAA than after CAA. Mean pressure, vector volume and sphincter symmetry at rest were significant determinants of continence in both groups but squeeze pressure did not correlate significantly with function in either group. Threshold volume, MTV, and compliance were significantly correlated with frequency of defecation in patients with IPAA but not with CAA. Conclusion, A strong consistent resting anal sphincter pressure is one determinant of continence after both IPAA and CAA. Squeeze pressures do not influence the functional result. In IPAA but not CAA, the neorectum has a reservoir function which correlates with the postoperative frequency of defaecation. [source] |