			Home About us Contact

Aneuploidy Detection (aneuploidy + detection)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Automatic analysis of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification products (exemplified by a commercial kit for prenatal aneuploidy detection)

ELECTROPHORESIS, Issue 22 2005
Tommy Gerdes Dr.
Abstract For use in routine prenatal diagnostics, we developed software and methods for automatic aneuploidy detection based on a commercial multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) kit. Software and methods ensure a reliable, objective, and fast workflow, and may be applied to other types of MLPA kits. Following CE of MLPA amplification products, the software automatically identified the peak area for each probe, normalized it in relation to the neighboring peak areas of the test sample, computed the ratio relative to a reference created from normal samples, and compensated the ratio for a side effect of the normalization procedure that scaled all chromosomally normal DNA peak areas slightly up or down depending on the kind of aneuploidy present. For the chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, probe reliability weighted mean ratio values and corresponding SDs were calculated, and the significance for being outside a reference interval around ratio 1.0 was tested. p,,,1% suggested aneuploidy and 1,<,p,,,5% suggested potential aneuploidy. Individual peaks, where the normalized area was situated more than 4 SD from the corresponding reference, suggested possible partial deletion or gain. Sample quality was automatically assessed. Control probes were not required. Having used the software and methods for two years, we conclude that a reliable, objective, and fast workflow is obtained. [source]

FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and 5 preimplantation embryos: the added value of extended aneuploidy detection

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, Issue 1 2007
E. B. Baart
Abstract Objective Screening for an increased number of chromosomes may improve the detection of abnormal embryos and thus contribute to the capability of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to detect the embryo(s) for transfer in IVF with the best chance for a healthy child. Good-quality day 4 and 5 embryos were analyzed after cryopreservation for the nine chromosomes mostly recommended for screening (13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y), next to six additional chromosomes which are less well studied in this context (1, 2, 7, 6, 10 and 17). Method The copy numbers of 15 chromosomes were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in three consecutive rounds. The proportion of aneuploid and mosaic embryos was determined and compared in retrospect to results in case only the recommended probe set had been analyzed. Results A total of 52 embryos from 29 infertile women were analyzed. Screening the embryos for six additional chromosomes increased the proportion of abnormal embryos from 67 to 81% (P = 0.03), owing to an increase in mosaic embryos. Conclusion All but one of the meiotic aneuploidies found in this study would have been detected by the probe set most frequently used in PGS clinics. However, aneuploid cell lines originating from mitotic errors could be detected for almost all chromosomes, so screening of six additional chromosomes mainly increased the proportion of mosaic embryos. The added value of screening for six additional chromosomes in PGS for clinical practice will remain undetermined as long as the fate of mosaic embryos after transfer is unclear. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, Issue 10 2004
Wing Cheong Leung
Abstract Background Reliable methods are available for rapid aneuploidy detection (RAD) for the prenatal diagnosis of trisomies 21, 18 and 13. This study examines the potential advantages and limitations of using RAD as a replacement rather than as an adjunct to traditional karyotyping. Methods One thousand five hundred and eighty-nine consecutive pregnancies referred for cytogenetic assessment were offered RAD (FISH or QF-PCR) as an adjunct to traditional karyotyping. The results of these two processes were compared, and the effects of three policies for cytogenetic evaluation were determined: RAD alone, a combination of RAD for all and traditional karyotyping for cases with ultrasound anomalies or a policy of RAD and traditional karyotyping in all cases. Results RAD was uninformative because of maternal-cell contamination in 37 (2.3%) cases compared to 4 (0.3%) cases of culture failure in traditional karyotyping. RAD and traditional karyotyping results were concordant in 1526 of 1548 (98.6%) cases. All non-mosaic cases of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and cases of triploidy were correctly identified by RAD, and there were no false-positive diagnoses. The gold standard of a traditional karyotype in each case would have detected all chromosomal abnormalities. A policy of RAD alone would have identified 60 of 73 (82%) clinically important chromosomal abnormalities. The addition of a full karyotype for cases with evidence of ultrasound abnormalities would have improved detection to 95%. Conclusion A policy offering RAD to all patients, but restricting traditional karyotyping to cases with ultrasound anomalies, would reduce the number of traditional karyotypes requested by 70%, but maintain a 95% detection rate for all clinically important chromosomal abnormalities. Further studies are required to determine whether similar results could be obtained in district general hospital units and to determine whether this approach would be acceptable to health professionals and patients. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]