Home About us Contact | |||
Anesthetic Mixture (anesthetic + mixture)
Selected AbstractsEffect of alkalinization and/or hyaluronidase adjuvancy on a local anesthetic mixture for sub-Tenon's ophthalmic blockACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2002M. M. Moharib Background and objectives: pH adjustment and/or addition of hyaluronidase to local anesthetic drugs decrease the time to onset and prolong the duration of regional anesthetic techniques for ocular surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate whether these factors are effective also in sub-Tenon's block. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to four groups in a double blind, prospective fashion, and received 5.125 ml mixtures as follows: 2.5 ml lignocaine 2%, 2.5 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.125 ml isotonic saline (group LB); 2.5 ml lignocaine 2%, 2.5 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 15 IU hyaluronidase/ml and 0.125 ml isotonic saline (group LBH); 2.5 ml lignocaine 2%, 2.5 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.125 ml sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (group LBpH); and 2.5 ml lignocaine 2%, 2.5 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 15 IU hyaluronidase/ml and 0.125 ml sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (group LBHpH). This measurement was based on one quadrant sub-Tenon's block. Akinesia was assessed every 30 s. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding mean times to onset and to complete akinesia. Group LBH displayed a significantly lower frequency of patients experiencing pain and a lower need for rescue medication during surgery than the other groups. Conclusion: pH adjustment and/or addition of hyaluronidase to a mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine did not shorten the time to onset of akinesia following sub-Tenon's technique. However, the addition of hyaluronidase was associated with a lower fraction of patients experiencing pain during surgery. [source] The Effect of Preemptive Analgesia in Postoperative Pain Relief,A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized StudyPAIN MEDICINE, Issue 1 2009Seetharaman Hariharan MD ABSTRACT Objective., To analyze the effect of infiltration of local anesthetics on postoperative pain relief. Design., Prospective randomized double-blind trial. Setting., University Teaching Hospital in Barbados, West Indies. Patients., Patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Interventions., Patients were randomly allocated into one of four groups according to the wound infiltration: 1) preoperative and postoperative 0.9% saline; 2) preoperative saline and postoperative local anesthetic mixture (10 mL 2% lidocaine added to 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine); 3) preoperative local anesthetic mixture and postoperative saline; and 4) preoperative and postoperative local anesthetic mixture. Both patients and investigators were blinded to the group allocation. All patients received pre-incision tenoxicam and morphine, standardized anesthesia, and postoperative morphine by patient-controlled analgesia. Outcome measures., The amount of morphine used and the intensity of pain as measured by visual analog pain scale were recorded at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Results., Eighty patients were studied with 20 in each group. Total dose of morphine used by patients who received preoperative and postoperative local anesthetic infiltration was lesser compared to other groups, although there was no statistically significant difference. Similarly, there was no difference in the intensity of pain between any groups. Conclusions., Local anesthetic infiltration before and/or after abdominal hysterectomy does not reduce the intensity of postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. [source] Addition of clonidine and fentanyl: comparison between three different regional anesthetic techniques in circumcisionPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 11 2005ZOUHER A NAJA MD Summary Background :,Several techniques have been used for alleviating postcircumcision pain with regional anesthetics being more effective than systemic opioids. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of dorsal penile block, ring block (RB) and dorsal penile block associated with RB in reducing postcircumcision pain in children. Methods :,We conducted a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial on 100 boys aged between 1 month and 5 years undergoing elective circumcision. Each 20 ml of local anesthetic mixture contained 9 ml lidocaine 1% without epinephrine, 9 ml bupivacaine 0.5%, 1 ml fentanyl (50 ,g·ml,1) and 1 ml clonidine (75 ,g·ml,1). They were allocated to one of three groups: 33 boys were given a RB with 1,1.5 ml (group 1), 32 had a dorsal penile block with 1.5,4 ml (group 2) and 35 had a combined ring and dorsal penile block with 2.5,5 ml of anesthetic mixture based on the child's age. Results :,Ninety-one children (91%) completed the clinical trial (three failed blocks and six follow-up losses). The groups were similar with regard to age, weight, height, duration of surgery and hemodynamic status. The average pain scores were significantly higher with a RB compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05) for the first postoperative day. RB children and dorsal penile block children consumed significantly more analgesics for the first six postoperative hours (P < 0.05). The surgeon's satisfaction was significantly higher with the ring + dorsal penile block group (100%) compared with the other two groups (P = 0.032). Conclusion :,Dorsal penile block plus RB technique is superior to dorsal penile block alone and RB alone in reducing postcircumcision pain in children. [source] |