			Home About us Contact

Anesthesia Group (anesthesia + group)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Digital versus Local Anesthesia for Finger Lacerations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 10 2006
Stuart Chale MD
Abstract Objectives To compare the pain of needle insertion, anesthesia, and suturing in finger lacerations after local anesthesia with prior topical anesthesia with that experienced after digital anesthesia. Methods This was a randomized controlled trial in a university-based emergency department (ED), with an annual census of 75,000 patient visits. ED patients aged ,8 years with finger lacerations were enrolled. After standard wound preparation and 15-minute topical application of lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine (LET) in all wounds, lacerations were randomized to anesthesia with either local or digital infiltration of 1% lidocaine. Pain of needle insertion, anesthetic infiltration, and suturing were recorded on a validated 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (worst); also recorded were percentage of wounds requiring rescue anesthesia; time until anesthesia; percentage of wounds with infection or numbness at day 7. Outcomes were compared by using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests. A sample of 52 patients had 80% power to detect a 15-mm difference in pain scores. Results Fifty-five patients were randomized to digital (n= 28) or local (n= 27) anesthesia. Mean age (±SD) was 38.1 (±16.8) years, 29% were female. Mean (±SD) laceration length and width were 1.7 (±0.7) cm and 2.0 (±1.0) mm, respectively. Groups were similar in baseline patient and wound characteristics. There were no between-group differences in pain of needle insertion (mean difference, 1.3 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] =,17.0 to 14.3 mm); anesthetic infiltration (mean difference, 2.3 mm; 95% CI =,19.7 to 4.4 mm), or suturing (mean difference, 7.6 mm; 95% CI =,3.3 to 21.1 mm). Only one patient in the digital anesthesia group required rescue anesthesia. There were no wound infections or persistent numbness in either group. Conclusions Digital and local anesthesia of finger lacerations with prior application of LET to all wounds results in similar pain of needle insertion, anesthetic infiltration, and pain of suturing. [source]

Midazolam dose for loss of response to verbal stimulation during the unilateral or bilateral spinal anesthesia

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2009
M. J. YUN
Background: We have conducted this study to investigate whether unilateral or bilateral spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine induces different sensitivity to intravenous (i.v.) midazolam for sedation. Methods: Forty-two patients undergoing various elective unilateral lower extremity surgeries were allocated into two groups: (1) unilateral spinal anesthesia group (Group US, n=21; heavy bupivacaine 5 mg/ml, 9 mg) and (2) bilateral spinal anesthesia group (Group BS, n=21; heavy bupivacaine 5 mg/ml, 9 mg). One milligram of midazolam was injected i.v. at 30-s intervals until the patients did not respond to the hand grasp test beginning 15 min after spinal anesthesia. The concentration of plasma bupivacaine was evaluated every 15 min for the first 75 min after the start of the spinal anesthesia, and the bispectral index was monitored continuously. Results: The mean venous plasma concentration of bupivacaine was not significantly different between Group US and BS. The dose of midazolam required to abolish responses to verbal commands was significantly lower in Group BS (mean 5.9±1.2 mg) vs. Group US (mean 9.0±1.4 mg). Conclusions: A higher dosage of midazolam is required for loss of response to verbal stimulation during unilateral spinal anesthesia than during bilateral spinal anesthesia. [source]

Influence of Isoflurane General Anesthesia or Anesthesia and Surgery on Thyroid Function Tests in Dogs

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 1 2009
M.A. Wood
Background: Anesthesia and surgery affect thyroid function tests in humans but have not been studied in dogs. Hypothesis: Anesthesia and anesthesia with surgery will affect thyroid function tests in dogs. Animals: Fifteen euthyroid dogs. Methods: Prospective, controlled, interventional study. Dogs were assigned to one of 3 groups: control, general anesthesia, and general anesthesia plus abdominal exploratory surgery. Dogs in the anesthesia and surgery groups were premedicated with acepromazine and morphine, induced with propofol, and maintained on isoflurane. Samples for measurement of serum thyroxine (T4), free T4 (fT4) by equilibrium dialysis, triiodothyronine (T3), reverse T3 (rT3), and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations were collected from each dog immediately before premedication, at multiple times during anesthesia, surgery, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after anesthesia, once daily for an additional 5 days, and once 14 days after anesthesia. Sampling was performed at identical times in the control group. Results: Serum T4 decreased significantly from baseline in the surgery and anesthesia groups compared with the control group at 0.33 (P= 0.043) and 1 hour (P= 0.018), and 2 (P= 0.031) and 4 hours (P= 0.037), respectively, then increased significantly in the surgery group compared with the control group at 24 hours (P= 0.005). Serum T3 decreased significantly from baseline in the anesthesia group compared with the control group at 1 hour (P= 0.034). Serum rT3 increased significantly from baseline in the surgery group compared with the control and anesthesia groups at 8 (P= 0.026) and 24 hours (P= 0.0001) and anesthesia group at 8, 12, 24, and 36 hours (P= 0.004, P= 0.016, P= 0.004, and P= 0.014, respectively). Serum fT4 increased significantly from baseline in the surgery group compared to the control at 24 hours (P= 0.006) and at day 7 (P= 0.037) and anesthesia group at 48 hours (P= 0.023). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Surgery and anesthesia have a significant effect on thyroid function tests in dogs. [source]

A Retrospective Study of the Incidence of Neurological Injury after Axillary Brachial Plexus Block

PAIN PRACTICE, Issue 2 2006
B. Ben-David MD
Abstract Background: It has been suggested that performing a nerve block under general anesthesia, as customary in pediatric population, may predispose to nerve injury. However, few clinical data exist to either support or refute this assertion. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on all patients who received an axillary block for upper extremity surgery in our institution during an eight-year period. The blocks were performed under sedation or general anesthesia, without using a nerve stimulator. Perioperative records from the Hand Surgery Unit Clinic were reviewed for postoperative complaints and complications. Results: In the eight-year period of the review, 336 patients had axillary block. In total, 230 received the block with sedation and 106 during general anesthesia. All the sedated patients were older than 14 years (mean age 45.2), while of the general anesthesia patients 48 were older than 14 years (mean age 13.9 years). There were six cases of postoperative nerve injury in sedated patients (2.6%) vs. eight cases (7.5%) in the general anesthesia patients. Most patients recovered fully within several weeks. One patient had permanent nerve injury. Conclusions: Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn because of disparities in patient group demographics (majority of pediatric patients were in the general anesthesia group) and the retrospective nature of this study. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that the conduct of axillary block under general anesthesia in pediatric patients holds a greater potential for nerve injury than when the block is performed under sedation in adults. [source]

Supplementing desflurane with intravenous anesthesia reduces fetal cardiac dysfunction during open fetal surgery

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 8 2010
ANNE BOAT MD
Summary Objective:, To lower the incidence and severity of fetal cardiovascular depression during maternal fetal surgery under general anesthesia. Aim:, We hypothesized that supplemental intravenous anesthesia (SIVA) with propofol and remifentanil would lower the need for high-dose inhalational anesthesia and provide adequate maternal depth of anesthesia and uterine relaxation. SIVA technique would minimize prolonged fetal exposure to deep inhalational anesthetics and significant intraoperative fetal cardiovascular depression. Background:, Fetal hypoxia and significant fetal hemodynamic changes occur during open fetal surgery because of the challenges such as surgical manipulation, hysterotomy, uterine contractions, and effects of anesthetic drugs. Tocolysis, a vital component of fetal surgery, is usually achieved using volatile anesthetic agents. High concentrations of volatile agents required to provide an appropriate degree of uterine relaxation may cause maternal hypotension and placental hypoperfusion, as well as direct fetal cardiovascular depression. Methods:, We reviewed medical records of 39 patients who presented for ex utero intrapartum treatment and mid-gestation open fetal surgery between April 2004 and March 2009. Out of 39 patients, three were excluded because of the lack of echocardiographic data; 18 patients received high-concentration desflurane anesthesia and 18 patients had SIVA with desflurane for uterine relaxation. We analyzed the following data: demographics, fetal medical condition, anesthetic drugs, concentration and duration of desflurane, maternal arterial blood pressure, intraoperative fetal echocardiogram, presence of fetal bradycardia, and need for intraoperative fetal resuscitation. Results:, Adequate uterine relaxation was achieved with about 1.5 MAC of desflurane in the SIVA group compared to about 2.5 MAC in the desflurane only anesthesia group (P = 0.0001). More fetuses in the high-dose desflurane group compared to the SIVA group developed moderate-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction over time intraoperatively (P = 0.02). 61% of fetuses in the high-dose desflurane group received fetal resuscitative interventions compared to 26% of fetuses in the SIVA group (P = 0.0489). Conclusion:, SIVA as described provides adequate maternal anesthesia and uterine relaxation, and it allows for decreased use of desflurane during open fetal surgery. Decreased use of desflurane may better preserve fetal cardiac function. [source]