Home About us Contact | |||
House Dust (house + dust)
Terms modified by House Dust Selected AbstractsEvaluation of quantitative PCR and culture methods for detection of house dust fungi and streptomycetes in relation to moisture damage of the houseLETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 4 2008U. Lignell Abstract Aims:, Microbial concentrations in vacuumed house dust samples (n = 71) were analysed by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods and their association with extent of moisture damage in the house was studied. Methods and Results:, Microbial concentrations measured by qPCR correlated with concentrations obtained by culture method, but were orders of magnitude higher. qPCR also had better sensitivity. Concentrations of several microbes in house dust, determined with qPCR, were associated with the extent of moisture damage in the house. This association was strongest for Penicillium brevicompactum, one of the fungi detected in highest concentrations by qPCR. Furthermore, house dust concentrations of Wallemia sebi, Trichoderma viride, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Eurotium amstelodami and the combined assay group for Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp. and Paecilomyces variotii were significantly associated with the extent of the moisture damage. Conclusion:, These species or assay groups could probably be used as indicators of moisture damage in the house. Significance and Impact of the Study:, This finding indicates the benefits of the qPCR method, which is sensitive enough to reveal the differences in microbial concentrations of house dust between moisture-damaged and undamaged houses. [source] The prevalence of mouse allergen in inner-city homesPEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Iwona Stelmach Mouse allergen has not been studied in detail in the general population. It is common for patients from inner-city environments to report significant mouse infestation in their homes and neighborhoods. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of mouse allergen in the homes of inner-city children with asthma in relation to the demographic features of these children and their specific housing characteristics. Seventy-eight dust samples from 39 inner-city homes of Lodz, Poland, were analyzed for mouse allergen. Skin-prick tests (SPTs) to mouse allergen were performed in all patients. In addition, data regarding the demographics and housing of the subjects were related to the mouse allergen levels. Mouse allergen was detected in 22 of 78 dust samples (28%), and in 18 of 39 homes (46%), including 13 kitchen (33%) and nine bedroom (23%) samples. Mouse allergen levels did not correlate between different rooms in the same home. The levels detected ranged from 0.09 to 2.34 µg/g of dust. The highest levels were found in kitchens, with median levels of 0.2 µg/g, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12,0.85 (range: 0.1,2.34 µg/g); in bedrooms the mean levels were 0.23 µg/g, 95% CI: 0.1,0.97 (range: 0.09,1.62 µg/g). Eleven of 18 children with detectable mouse allergen in house dust, and three of 21 without detectable mouse allergen in house dust, had a positive SPT to mouse allergen. On home inspection, 18% of the homes had evidence of mice in one or two rooms and had higher levels of mouse allergen (p < 0.01). None of the other subject or housing variables evaluated were associated with higher mouse allergen levels. In Polish children, mouse allergen is an important factor of sensitivity and should be recognized in the diagnosis of allergic diseases as well as in allergen-reduction programmes. [source] Quantification of group 5 grass pollen allergens in house dustCLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, Issue 11 2000B. Fahlbusch Background It is widely known and accepted that grass pollen is a major outdoor cause of hay fever. However, it is of virtual importance for grass pollen allergic patients with symptoms all the year round to know the concentration of grass pollen allergens in their homes. Objective The main objective of this study was to quantify the amount of grass pollen allergen in mass units (,g Phl p 5) in dust settled indoors and to detect the distribution of allergenic activity in different sampling locations of homes. Furthermore, we studied the seasonal fluctuation of allergen content in dust samples. Methods We adapted the two site binding assay for detection of group 5 grass pollen allergens in samples from randomly selected homes in Hamburg (n = 371), Erfurt (n = 396), Hettstedt (n = 353), Zerbst (n = 289) and Bitterfeld (n = 226), Germany. Dust samples were collected from floor of living room (LR), bedroom (BR) or children's room (CR) and mattress (MA) during period of June 1995 to August 1998. The amount of the major grass group 5 allergens was detected in ,g/g dust. Results Phl p 5 was detected in 67% of the samples analysed (n = 4760). The range was between undetectable (< 0.03 ,g/g dust) and 81 ,g/g dust. Phl p 5 levels were significantly higher in the dust from LR (geometric mean 0.117 ,g/g dust) or BR/CR floors (geometric mean 0.098 ,g/g dust) than in mattresses (geometric mean 0.043 ,g/g dust). We observed seasonal fluctuation of indoor Phl p 5 levels with peak in June but also annual differences. Thus Phl p 5 content indoors reflects also the different quantities of pollen counts of annual courses. During pollination period we found two times higher Phl p 5 levels (0.172 ,g/g dust, P < 0.001) than outside of grass pollination season (0.095 ,g/g dust). The indoor Phl p 5 levels outside of season seem to be independent of pollination before. We suppose that settled pollen grains or allergenic material from outdoor particles carried indoors via footwear and clothes accumulates in house dust. Conclusion Although we not known how the allergens in settled dust are equilibrated with those in the air, the considerable high level of Phl p 5 in indoor dust even during periods when no grass pollen is present in the atmosphere may be an important cause of pollen-allergy symptoms outside of season. [source] Adverse health effects of children's exposure to pesticides: What do we really know and what can be done about itACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 2006JOANNA JUREWICZ Abstract Children may be exposed to pesticides in several ways, such as by transplacental transfer during foetal life, by intake of contaminated breast milk and other nutrients, or by contact with contaminated subjects and areas in the environment such as pets treated with insecticides, house dust, carpets and chemically treated lawns and gardens. Exposure early in life, and particularly during periods of rapid development, such as during foetal life and infancy, may have severe effects on child health and development by elevating the risk of congenital malformations, cancer, malabsorption, immunological dysfunction, endocrine disease, and neurobehavioural deficiencies. As pesticides can also interfere with parental reproductive health, exposure of parents may have consequences for the offspring leading to reduced chance of male birth and increased risk of childhood cancer. Conclusions: Current knowledge about tolerable levels and consequences of toxic exposure to pesticides during human development is rather scarce. Owing to the high risk of exposure to pesticides, particularly in less developed countries, further elucidation by well-controlled epidemiological studies in this field it is urgently needed. The Policy Interpretation Network on Children's Health and Environment (PINCHE), which is financed by the EU DG research has suggested actions against pesticide exposure. They have been presented and discussed in this paper. Several suggestions of PINCHE concerning action needed regarding pesticides were presented in the paper. [source] |