Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hot Air Dehydration (hot + air_dehydration)
Selected AbstractsComparative Study of Quality Changes Occurring on Dehydration and Rehydration of Cooked Chickpeas (Cicer Arietinum L.) Subjected to Combined Microwave,Convective and Convective Hot Air DehydrationJOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, Issue 6 2006A.A. Gowen ABSTRACT:, Convective hot air dehydration (100 °C) of cooked chickpeas was compared with the combination of microwave,convective hot air dehydration, in terms of microstructure, density, color, texture, dehydration, and rehydration. In the combined drying experiments, 2 levels of microwave power (100 W and 200 W) were investigated, combined continuously with convective air drying at 100 °C. Compared with convective hot air drying, combination drying led to a considerable reduction in dehydration time. Combination drying also improved the porosity of the finished dehydrated product, leading to faster rehydration kinetics. Cryogenic scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that chickpeas subjected to combined drying experienced less shrinkage than those dried by convective hot air. Combination drying at the higher (200 W) level produced a darker (P < 0.05) rehydrated product with significantly lower relative rehydrated moisture content (P < 0.05) when compared with the lower (100 W) level of combination drying. [source] Hot air dehydration of figs (Ficus carica L.): drying kinetics and quality lossINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, Issue 7 2004Antonio Piga Summary The dehydration of fruit from fig trees is normally achieved by sun drying. There is concern about the safety of the end product, mainly because there is a risk of the development of aflatoxins. These concerns can be overcome by artificial drying (oven dehydration). Fig fruits of a local cultivar, which were either pre-treated by blanching or blanching plus sulphuring or not treated at all, underwent hot air dehydration under mild processing conditions in a pilot airflow cabinet dryer. Sampling was carried out at regular intervals to calculate the rate of dehydration and assess quality changes. Microbiological counts and nonenzymatic browning were also monitored. Pretreatments resulted in a shorter processing time, compared with control fruits. In general, a falling dehydration rate period was observed. A dramatic loss of ascorbic acid was recorded, while an informal sensorial assay of the dried fruits gave a positive assessment. [source] Comparative Study of Quality Changes Occurring on Dehydration and Rehydration of Cooked Chickpeas (Cicer Arietinum L.) Subjected to Combined Microwave,Convective and Convective Hot Air DehydrationJOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, Issue 6 2006A.A. Gowen ABSTRACT:, Convective hot air dehydration (100 °C) of cooked chickpeas was compared with the combination of microwave,convective hot air dehydration, in terms of microstructure, density, color, texture, dehydration, and rehydration. In the combined drying experiments, 2 levels of microwave power (100 W and 200 W) were investigated, combined continuously with convective air drying at 100 °C. Compared with convective hot air drying, combination drying led to a considerable reduction in dehydration time. Combination drying also improved the porosity of the finished dehydrated product, leading to faster rehydration kinetics. Cryogenic scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that chickpeas subjected to combined drying experienced less shrinkage than those dried by convective hot air. Combination drying at the higher (200 W) level produced a darker (P < 0.05) rehydrated product with significantly lower relative rehydrated moisture content (P < 0.05) when compared with the lower (100 W) level of combination drying. [source] | ||||||||||