			Home About us Contact

Host Nuclei (host + nucleus)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Widespread occurrence of an intranuclear bacterial parasite in vent and seep bathymodiolin mussels

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 5 2009
Frank U. Zielinski
Summary Many parasitic bacteria live in the cytoplasm of multicellular animals, but only a few are known to regularly invade their nuclei. In this study, we describe the novel bacterial parasite "Candidatus Endonucleobacter bathymodioli" that invades the nuclei of deep-sea bathymodiolin mussels from hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. Bathymodiolin mussels are well known for their symbiotic associations with sulfur- and methane-oxidizing bacteria. In contrast, the parasitic bacteria of vent and seep animals have received little attention despite their potential importance for deep-sea ecosystems. We first discovered the intranuclear parasite "Ca. E. bathymodioli" in Bathymodiolus puteoserpentis from the Logatchev hydrothermal vent field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Using primers and probes specific to "Ca. E. bathymodioli" we found this intranuclear parasite in at least six other bathymodiolin species from vents and seeps around the world. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and transmission electron microscopy analyses of the developmental cycle of "Ca. E. bathymodioli" showed that the infection of a nucleus begins with a single rod-shaped bacterium which grows to an unseptated filament of up to 20 ,m length and then divides repeatedly until the nucleus is filled with up to 80 000 bacteria. The greatly swollen nucleus destroys its host cell and the bacteria are released after the nuclear membrane bursts. Intriguingly, the only nuclei that were never infected by "Ca. E. bathymodioli" were those of the gill bacteriocytes. These cells contain the symbiotic sulfur- and methane-oxidizing bacteria, suggesting that the mussel symbionts can protect their host nuclei against the parasite. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the "Ca. E. bathymodioli" belongs to a monophyletic clade of Gammaproteobacteria associated with marine metazoans as diverse as sponges, corals, bivalves, gastropods, echinoderms, ascidians and fish. We hypothesize that many of the sequences from this clade originated from intranuclear bacteria, and that these are widespread in marine invertebrates. [source]

Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus inclusion bodies: structural, compositional and staining properties

ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2003
L J LITTLEFIELD
Summary Anatomy and cytochemistry of inclusion bodies induced by Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus infection were studied in roots and leaves to learn more about the nature of inclusions and their roles in pathogenesis. Acid Fuchsin, Giemsa stain, Toluidine Blue and Trypan Blue stains facilitated visualization of inclusion bodies. Combined, simultaneous staining with Acid Fuchsin and Toluidine Blue clearly differentiated inclusion bodies from host nuclei. The overall anatomy, composition and structure of virus inclusions in leaves and roots were generally similar, as shown by phase contrast, differential interference contrast, epifluorescence, laser scanning confocal and transmission electron microscopy. Both were often closely associated with host nuclei; both were comprised of intertwined masses of tubular material, presumably endoplasmic reticulum, and in which varied numbers and sizes of vacuolar cavities occurred. Leaf inclusions, however, were typically larger and more vacuolate than those in roots. Lipids were found to be significant constituents of both the tubular and vacuolar components of inclusions, indicated by positive staining with Nile Red and Sudan Black. Inclusion bodies in both leaves and roots lost their structural and compositional integrity, eventually becoming disorganized and devoid of clearly identifiable components as host tissue aged and symptom expression advanced. Significant results of this study include the first published examination of virus inclusion bodies in root tissue, the degree of structural detail of inclusion body anatomy revealed by laser scanning confocal microscopy and the presence of an extensive lipid component in virus inclusion bodies. [source]

A HYPOTHESIS FOR IMPORT OF THE NUCLEAR-ENCODED PsaE PROTEIN OF PAULINELLA CHROMATOPHORA (CERCOZOA, RHIZARIA) INTO ITS CYANOBACTERIAL ENDOSYMBIONTS/PLASTIDS VIA THE ENDOMEMBRANE SYSTEM,

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, Issue 5 2010
Mackiewicz
The cyanobacterial endosymbionts of Paulinella chromatophora can shed new light on the process of plastid acquisition. Their genome is devoid of many essential genes, suggesting gene transfer to the host nucleus and protein import back into the endosymbionts/plastids. Strong evidence for such gene transfer is provided by the psaE gene, which encodes a PSI component that was efficiently transferred to the Paulinella nucleus. It remains unclear, however, how this protein is imported into the endosymbionts/plastids. We reanalyzed the sequence of Paulinella psaE and identified four potential non-AUG translation initiation codons upstream of the previously proposed start codon. Interestingly, the longest polypeptide, starting from the first UUG, contains a clearly identifiable signal peptide with very high (90%) predictability. We also found several downstream hairpin structures that could enhance translation initiation from the alternative codon. These results strongly suggest that the PsaE protein is targeted to the outer membrane of Paulinella endosymbionts/plastids via the endomembrane system. On the basis of presence of respective bacterial homologs in the Paulinella endosymbiont/plastid genome, we discuss further trafficking of PsaE through the peptidoglycan wall and the inner envelope membrane. It is possible that other nuclear-encoded proteins of P. chromatophora also carry signal peptides, but, alternatively, some may be equipped with transit peptides. If this is true, Paulinella endosymbionts/plastids would possess two distinct targeting systems, one cotranslational and the second posttranslational, as has been found in higher plant plastids. Considering the endomembrane system-mediated import pathway, we also discuss homology of the membranes surrounding Paulinella endosymbionts/plastids. [source]

Genetic Diversity of Parasitic Dinoflagellates in the Genus Amoebophrya and Its Relationship to Parasite Biology and Biogeography

THE JOURNAL OF EUKARYOTIC MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 1 2008
SUNJU KIM
ABSTRACT. We determined 18S rRNA gene sequences of Amoebophrya strains infecting the thecate dinoflagellates Alexandrium affine and Gonyaulax polygramma from Korean coastal waters and compared those data with previously reported sequences of Amoebophrya from cultures, infected cells concentrated from field samples, and environmental 18S rRNA gene sequences obtained from a variety of marine environments. Further, we used these data to examine genetic diversity in Amoebophrya strains relative to geographic origin, host phylogeny, site of infection, and host specificity. In our analyses of known dinoflagellate taxa, the 13 available Amoebophrya sequences clustered together within the dinoflagellates as three groups forming a monophyletic group with high bootstrap support (maximum likelihood, ML: 100%) or a posterior probability (PP) of 1. When the Amoebophrya sequences were analyzed along with environmental sequences associated with Marine Alveolate Group II, nine subgroups formed a monophyletic group with high bootstrap support (ML: 100%) and PP of 1. Sequences known to be from Amoebophrya spp. infecting dinoflagellate hosts were distributed in seven of those subgroups. Despite differences in host species and geographic origin (Korea, United States, and Europe), Amoebophrya strains (Group II) from Gymnodinium instriatum, A. affine, Ceratium tripos (AY208892), Prorocentrum micans, and Ceratium lineatum grouped together by all of our tree construction methods, even after adding the environmental sequences. By contrast, strains within Groups I and III divided into several lineages following inclusion of environmental sequences. While Amoebophrya strains within Group II mostly developed within the host cytoplasm, strains in Groups I and III formed infections inside the host nucleus, a trait that appeared across several of the subgroups. Host specificity varied from moderately to extremely species-specific within groups, including Group II. Taken together, our results imply that genetic diversity in Amoebophrya strains does not always reflect parasite biology or biogeography. [source]