Home  About us  Contact
 

Hoarse Voice (hoarse + voice)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences80%

Selected Abstracts

Hoarse voice in adults: an evidence-based approach to the 12 minute consultation

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 1 2009
I. Syed
Background:, The hoarse voice is a common presentation in the adult ENT clinic. It is estimated that otolaryngology/voice clinics receive over 50 000 patients with dysphonia each year. Good vocal function is estimated to be required for around 1/3 of the labour force to fulfil their job requirements. The assessment and management of the patient with a hoarse voice is potentially a complex and protracted process as the aetiology is often multi-factorial. This article provides a guide for the clinician in the general ENT clinic to make a concise, thorough assessment of the hoarse patient and engage in an evidence based approach to investigation and management. Method:, Literature search performed on 4 October 2008 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases using subject headings hoarse voice or dysphonia in combination with diagnosis, management, investigation, treatment, intervention and surgery. Results:, General vocal hygiene is beneficial for non organic dysphonia but the evidence base for individual components is poor. There is a good evidence base for the use of voice therapy as first line treatment of organic dysphonia such as vocal fold nodules and polyps. There is little evidence for surgical intervention as first line therapy for most common benign vocal fold lesions. Surgery is, however, the treatment of choice for hoarseness due to papillomatosis. Both CO2 laser and microdissection are equally acceptable modalities for surgical resection of common benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor. Despite the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors for treating laryngopharyngeal reflux, there is high quality evidence to suggest that they are no more effective than placebo. Conclusion:, A concise and thorough approach to assessment in the general ENT clinic will provide the diagnosis and facilitate the management of the hoarse voice in the majority of cases. Voice therapy is an important tool that should be utilised in the general ENT clinic and should not be restricted to the specialist voice clinic. If there is no improvement after initial measures, the larynx appears normal and/or the patient has failed initial speech & language therapy, referral to a specialist voice clinic may be helpful. More research is still required particularly with regard to laryngopharyngeal reflux which is often cited as an important cause of hoarseness but is still poorly understood. [source]

Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency alleles are associated with joint dislocation and scoliosis in Williams syndrome,

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, Issue 2 2010
Colleen A. Morris
Abstract Elastin haploinsufficiency is responsible for a significant portion of the Williams syndrome (WS) phenotype including hoarse voice, supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS), hernias, diverticuli of bowel and bladder, soft skin, and joint abnormalities. All of the connective tissue signs and symptoms are variable in the WS population, but few factors other than age and gender are known to influence the phenotype. We examined a cohort of 205 individuals with WS for mutations in SERPINA1, the gene that encodes alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT), the inhibitor of elastase. Individuals with classic WS deletions and SERPINA1 genotypes PiMS or PiMZ were more likely than those with a SERPINA1 PiMM genotype to have joint dislocation or scoliosis. However, carrier status for AAT deficiency was not correlated with presence of inguinal hernia or with presence or severity of SVAS. These findings suggest that genes important in elastin metabolism are candidates for variability in the connective tissue abnormalities in WS. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

The Use of Buccal Mucosa Graft at Posterior Cricoid Splitting for Subglottic Stenosis Repair,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 12 2001
Robert Thomé PhD
Abstract Background Since 1955, when Réthi established the posterior cricoid split augmentation (PCSA) method, several authors have published supporting reports of the validity and proven efficacy of its basic principles. A 27-year prospective, retrospective study. Objectives To report on experience in performing the PCSA method for subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis repair using buccal mucosa interposition grafting at posterior cricoid split and stenting for 8 weeks, and to assess the impact on vocal function. Methods From 1972 on, 60 patients (45 adults, 15 children, aged 8 mo to 72 y) with subglottic and/or posterior,glottic stenosis were operated on using a modified PCSA method. The surgical technique consisted of posterior cricoid splitting, including or not the interarytenoid muscle; wide lateral retraction of the posterior cricoid halves; buccal mucosa interposition grafting and stenting for 8 weeks. The factors evaluated included the subglottic remodeling rate, donor and recipient sites morbidity, time to decannulation, rate of graft take, and phonatory function tests. Results The modified PCSA procedure resulted in a decannulation rate of 90%, 18 (30%) of which had further procedure to achieve decannulation, and 6 adult patients (10%) were considered failures because of restenosis. The rate of take of the mucosa graft was 100% in both children and adults, with complete epithelialization of the grafted area, the mucosa not becoming dry and crusty. No interarytenoid muscle division resulted in near-normal to normal glottic voicing. Interarytenoid muscle division determined supraglottic voicing with inspiratory noise and pneumophonic incoordination, breathy and hoarse voice, low fundamental frequency, limited dynamic range, and shortened phonation time. Conclusion The PCSA procedure with buccal mucosa graft is reliable, safe, and highly successful with respect to the graft incorporation and subglottic remodeling. The division or not of the interarytenoid muscle is the most important factor influencing the postoperative vocal function. [source]

Hoarse voice in adults: an evidence-based approach to the 12 minute consultation

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 1 2009
I. Syed
Background:, The hoarse voice is a common presentation in the adult ENT clinic. It is estimated that otolaryngology/voice clinics receive over 50 000 patients with dysphonia each year. Good vocal function is estimated to be required for around 1/3 of the labour force to fulfil their job requirements. The assessment and management of the patient with a hoarse voice is potentially a complex and protracted process as the aetiology is often multi-factorial. This article provides a guide for the clinician in the general ENT clinic to make a concise, thorough assessment of the hoarse patient and engage in an evidence based approach to investigation and management. Method:, Literature search performed on 4 October 2008 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases using subject headings hoarse voice or dysphonia in combination with diagnosis, management, investigation, treatment, intervention and surgery. Results:, General vocal hygiene is beneficial for non organic dysphonia but the evidence base for individual components is poor. There is a good evidence base for the use of voice therapy as first line treatment of organic dysphonia such as vocal fold nodules and polyps. There is little evidence for surgical intervention as first line therapy for most common benign vocal fold lesions. Surgery is, however, the treatment of choice for hoarseness due to papillomatosis. Both CO2 laser and microdissection are equally acceptable modalities for surgical resection of common benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is commonly cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor. Despite the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors for treating laryngopharyngeal reflux, there is high quality evidence to suggest that they are no more effective than placebo. Conclusion:, A concise and thorough approach to assessment in the general ENT clinic will provide the diagnosis and facilitate the management of the hoarse voice in the majority of cases. Voice therapy is an important tool that should be utilised in the general ENT clinic and should not be restricted to the specialist voice clinic. If there is no improvement after initial measures, the larynx appears normal and/or the patient has failed initial speech & language therapy, referral to a specialist voice clinic may be helpful. More research is still required particularly with regard to laryngopharyngeal reflux which is often cited as an important cause of hoarseness but is still poorly understood. [source]