Histologic Remission (histologic + remission)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Usefulness of MRI volumetric evaluation in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 2 2007
Mehran Baghi MD
Abstract Background. The purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of tumor volumetry on MRI as predictive of response to treatment with induction chemotherapy, comparing the results with endoscopy. Methods: Fifty patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SSCHN) who underwent MRI volumetry before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) were included in this study. The tumor volume was calculated by a slice-by-slice evaluation. With the standard software of a workstation, the area of the tumor was measured slice by slice using manual segmentation. To evaluate the efficacy of MRI volumetry, pretreatment volume was compared with pretreatment remission status as evaluated with endoscopy. Results. Forty-five (90%) patients demonstrated a tumor downstaging after chemotherapy. Fourteen (28%) patients showed a complete histologic remission (CR), 31 (62%) patients showed a partial remission (PR). Pretreatment tumor volume was significantly different between patients whose tumor completely responded (CR) and those whose tumor did not completely respond or whose disease was stable or was progressive (p = .00023). We defined a threshold for the pretreatment tumor volume in patients with CR, which was equal to 29.71 cc. Conclusion. We propose that MRI tumor volume analyses can be a useful parameter to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in SCCHN. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2007 [source]


A new oral delivery system for 5-ASA: Preliminary clinical findings for MMx

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 5 2005
Cosimo Prantera MD
Abstract Background: Multi-matrix (MMx), a new delivery system for mesalazine, seems to release 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) preferentially in the sigmoid colon. This study had 2 objectives: (1) to evaluate the therapeutic response to MMx in patients with active left-sided disease and (2) to gain additional insights as to how the therapy would compare with topical 5-ASA. Methods: Patients received either 1.2 g of 5-ASA MMx three times per day plus placebo enema or 4 g of 5-ASA enema plus placebo tablets for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (clinical activity index ,4) at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints were endoscopic and histologic remissions. Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled. Clinical remission rates at 4 and 8 weeks were 57.5% and 60.0% for patients treated with MMx and 68.4% and 50.0% for patients randomized to 5-ASA enemas, respectively (95% confidence interval for the difference at 8 weeks, ,12 to +32). Endoscopic remission was achieved by 45.0% of patients on 5-ASA MMx and by 36.8% of those on enema, whereas 15.0% and 8% of patients, respectively, showed histologic remission. Compliance was 97.0% for oral and 87.5% for topical therapy. In the enema group, compliance was 88.0% for the patients in remission and 65.5% for those with active disease. Conclusions: Preliminary studies suggest that similar rates for induction of remission can be expected from 5-ASA enemas and MMx for patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis. [source]


Eosinophilic oesophagitis and coeliac disease: is there an association?

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 3 2007
L. QUAGLIETTA
Aim, To report a series of 17 children affected by eosinophilic oesophagitis. Six of them also received a diagnosis of coeliac disease. Methods, Seventeen children with history of dyspeptic symptoms were investigated. Results, Six patients (M/F:2/4; mean age ± s.d.: 5.6 ± 1.3 years, range: 4,7 years; Group A) affected by eosinophilic oesophagitis also received a diagnosis of coeliac disease. The other 11 children (M/F:10/1, mean age ± s.d.:7.5 ± 2.3 years, range: 4,10 years, Group B) were affected solely by eosinophilic oesophagitis. All children underwent a change in dietary regimen. Group A received a gluten-free diet. Group B attempted dietary restriction based on the allergy testing results. After 6 months follow-up, all patients in Group A showed a complete disappearance of symptoms and three of them, who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, showed histologic remission. Patients from Group B had moderate clinical improvement and in seven of them (64%) a repeated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a statistically significant reduction in eosinophilic infiltration. Conclusions, This is the first reported group of patients with an association between coeliac disease and eosinophilic oesophagitis. To date, it is not possible to exclude that in a subgroup of children with coeliac disease the oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration could be caused by coeliac disease itself. [source]


A new oral delivery system for 5-ASA: Preliminary clinical findings for MMx

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 5 2005
Cosimo Prantera MD
Abstract Background: Multi-matrix (MMx), a new delivery system for mesalazine, seems to release 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) preferentially in the sigmoid colon. This study had 2 objectives: (1) to evaluate the therapeutic response to MMx in patients with active left-sided disease and (2) to gain additional insights as to how the therapy would compare with topical 5-ASA. Methods: Patients received either 1.2 g of 5-ASA MMx three times per day plus placebo enema or 4 g of 5-ASA enema plus placebo tablets for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (clinical activity index ,4) at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints were endoscopic and histologic remissions. Results: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled. Clinical remission rates at 4 and 8 weeks were 57.5% and 60.0% for patients treated with MMx and 68.4% and 50.0% for patients randomized to 5-ASA enemas, respectively (95% confidence interval for the difference at 8 weeks, ,12 to +32). Endoscopic remission was achieved by 45.0% of patients on 5-ASA MMx and by 36.8% of those on enema, whereas 15.0% and 8% of patients, respectively, showed histologic remission. Compliance was 97.0% for oral and 87.5% for topical therapy. In the enema group, compliance was 88.0% for the patients in remission and 65.5% for those with active disease. Conclusions: Preliminary studies suggest that similar rates for induction of remission can be expected from 5-ASA enemas and MMx for patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis. [source]