Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
High-risk HPV Testing (high-risk + hpv_testing)
Selected AbstractsComparison of p16INK4A and Hybrid Capture® 2 human papillomavirus testing as adjunctive tests in liquid-based gynecologic SurePathÔ preparationsDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 3 2008Aziza Nassar M.D., F.I.A.C. Abstract p16INK4a, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, is functionally inactivated in many tumors, including cervical cancer. We compared p16INK4A immunocytochemical staining and Hybrid Capture® 2 (HCII) on SurePathÔ specimens using tissue biopsies (as the gold standard). Their utility in a spectrum of atypical and preneoplastic lesions, and their ability to accurately identify underlying lesions of CIN II or greater was assessed using biopsy follow-up data. One-hundred and seventeen residual SurePathÔ samples were collected: 43 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), 47 low-grade (LGSIL), and 27 high-grade (HGSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesions. Two slides were prepared from each sample; one stained with the SurePathÔ autocyte stain and one immunostained using the CINtecÔ p16INK4a Cytology Kit (Dakocytomation). High-risk HPV testing was performed using the HCII DNA test (Digene, Gaithersburg, MD). Available tissue biopsy follow-up data was retrieved. p16INK4a was positive in 32.6% (14/43) ASCUS, 46.8% (22/47) LGSIL, and 48.1% (13/27) HGSIL specimens. HCII DNA test was positive in 41.9% (18/43) ASCUS, 78.7% (37/47) LGSIL, and 96.3% (26/27) HGSIL samples. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of p16INK4a and HCII were: 58.7% and 89.8%, 58.6% and 34.6%, 69.2% and 72.1%, 47.2% and 64.3%, respectively. In patients with cervical biopsies, the PPV of HCII (92.3%) results for a biopsy with CINII/III was significantly higher than the PPV of p16INK4a (52%) (P = 0.001). Using liquid-based cytology specimens, HCII is a more sensitive test than p16INK4a for detection of abnormal cytology. HCII has a higher PPV than p16INK4a for identifying CIN II/III. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2008;36:142,148. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction in primary cervical cancer screeningCYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 2 2001Y. L. Oh Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction in primary cervical cancer screening The purposes of this study were to evaluate the incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and to assess its diagnostic usefulness in primary cervical screening. PCR testing for HPV type 16, 18, 31 and 33 was performed on 1305 specimens obtained during routine cervical cancer screening. We analysed the concurrent cervical smears and biopsy, and correlated them with the HPV infection status. We also evaluated histologically-proven cases with ASCUS smears according to HPV infection. HPV DNA was identified in eight (0.7%) of 1144 cytologically normal patients; nine (10.5%) of 86 ASCUS; seven (25.0%) of 28 LSIL; 26 (78.8%) of 33 HSIL; and in all of three squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). HPV positivity was significantly associated with cytohistological diagnosis for HSIL of more. In addition, HPV-positive ASCUS cases were found to be associated with histological abnormality rather than HPV-negative. The results indicate that high-risk HPV testing by PCR could be a useful adjunct tool for Pap smear in primary cervical screening. The combination of Pap smear and high-risk HPV testing by PCR might reduce unnecessary colposcopy-guided biopsy of women with cytological diagnosis of ASCUS. [source] ASC-US and high-risk HPV testing: Performance in daily clinical practiceDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 11 2006Suzanne M. Selvaggi M.D.Article first published online: 13 OCT 200 Abstract Data are beginning to accrue on high-risk HPV DNA testing in patients with ASC-US on cervical cytology. We report on our experience at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. From February 2002 through December 31, 2005 (3 yr, 11 mo), the cytopathology laboratory processed 49,599 Pap Tests, of which 1,792 (3.6%) were diagnosed as ASC-US. Six hundred and seventy two (37.5%) of these cases were processed for high-risk HPV genotypes using the Digene Hybrid® Capture II method. Of these cases, 266 (39.6%) were positive for high-risk HPV genotypes, 11 (1.6%) were equivocal, and 395 (58.8%) were negative. Biopsy follow-up was available for 127 (47.7%) of the 266 cases, of which 66 (52%) were negative, 46 (36.2%) showed CIN I, 9 (7.1%) were CIN II, and 6 (4.7%) were CIN III. Of the remaining 139 (52.3%) cases, 86 (62%) had follow-up Pap Tests, of which 57 (66.3%) were negative, 15 (17.4%) were ASC-US, 12 (15%) were low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 2 (2.3%) were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; 53 (38.1%) were lost to follow-up. In combination, 90 (42.25%) of the 213 cases with follow-up showed atypia or above after a diagnosis of ASC-US; of which 58 (64%) were low-grade lesions and 17 (19%) were high-grade lesions. Our laboratory's reported high-risk HPV positivity is comparable to recent reports in the literature on its use in daily clinical practice. In addition, cervical abnormalities were found in a significant proportion of the cases. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2006;34: 731,733. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] The clinical relevance of human papillomavirus testing: relationship between analytical and clinical sensitivityTHE JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, Issue 1 2003Peter JF Snijders Abstract Given the fact that infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is causally involved in cervical cancer, addition of high-risk HPV testing to a cervical smear may improve the efficacy of cervical cancer screening programmes, the triage of women with equivocal or borderline Pap smears, and the monitoring of women who have been treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3). Compared to a cervical smear HPV tests revealed a superior sensitivity (ie clinical sensitivity) for lesions , CIN 3, and a negative predictive value approaching 100%. However, a potential complication is the availability of several HPV testing methods, all displaying a different sensitivity and specificity to detect HPV-positive women (ie analytical sensitivity and specificity). There is now compelling evidence that the clinical sensitivity and specificity of HPV tests are not simply synonymous to their analytical sensitivity and specificity, respectively. In fact, a distinction between so-called clinically relevant and irrelevant high-risk HPV infections should be made when considering HPV tests for primary screening, triage policies, or post-treatment monitoring. Here, we discuss the potential importance of HPV load in the context of currently widely applied HPV detection methods, to distinguish clinically relevant from irrelevant HPV infections. From this it can be concluded that it is of utmost importance to define criteria, involving viral load threshold and the type of HPV detection method that should be fulfilled by an HPV test before implementation of such a test in clinical practice and population-based cervical cancer screening programmes. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | ||||||||||