Home About us Contact | |||
High Predictability (high + predictability)
Selected AbstractsHigh-resolution limited-area ensemble predictions based on low-resolution targeted singular vectorsTHE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, Issue 582 2002Inger-Lise Frogner Abstract The operational limited-area model, HIRLAM, at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute is used at 0.25° latitude/longitude resolution for ensemble weather prediction over Northern Europe and adjacent parts of the North Atlantic Ocean; this system is called LAMEPS. Initial and lateral boundary perturbations are taken from coarse-resolution European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts global ensemble members based on targeted singular vectors (TEPS). Five winter and five summer cases in 1997 consisting of 20 ensemble members plus one control forecast are integrated. Two sets of ensembles are generated, one for which both initial and lateral boundary conditions are perturbed, and another with only the initial fields perturbed. The LAMEPS results are compared to those of TEPS using the following measures: r.m.s. ensemble spread of 500 hPa geopotential height; r.m.s. ensemble spread of mean-sea-level pressure; Brier Skill Scores (BSS); Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves; and cost/loss analyses. For forecasts longer than 12 hours, all measures show that perturbing the boundary fields is crucial for the performance of LAMEPS. For the winter cases TEPS has slightly larger ensemble spread than LAMEPS, but this is reversed for the summer cases. Results from BSS, ROC and cost/loss analyses show that LAMEPS performed considerably better than TEPS for precipitation, a result that is promising for forecasting extreme precipitation amounts. We believe this result to be linked to the high predictability of mesoscale flows controlled by complex topography. For two-metre temperature, however, TEPS frequently performed better than LAMEPS. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society [source] Immediate Loading of Brånemark System Implants®: A Comparison Between TiUniteTM and Turned Implants Placed in the Anterior MandibleCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 4 2006Kjell-Krister Fröberg DDS ABSTRACT Purpose:, The aim of the present study was to compare the treatment outcome of TiUniteTM - and turned-surfaced Brånemark System® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) implants when applying immediate loading of cross-arch designed fixed partial dentures in the anterior mandible. Materials and Methods:, Fifteen patients with edentulous mandibles participated in the study. In one half of the jaw, between the exit of the nerve-vessel bundle and the midline, one type of implant was placed and in the remaining half the other type. The implants were loaded the day of surgery via a fixed, temporary supra-construction. Ten days later, the permanent one was screw retained to the implant pillars. Results:, The present 18-month clinical trial failed to demonstrate any differences regarding healing and cumulative success rate of an an-oxidized implant surface (TiUnite) and a turned (turned) one when implants in the anterior mandible were exposed to functional load within 24 hours after installation. Conclusion:, A high predictability regarding the treatment outcome for immediately loaded Brånemark implants in the anterior mandible was observed. Furthermore, no difference between the traditional turned and the an-oxidized implant surface (TiUnite) could be observed. However, it has to be stressed that all implants (irrespective of surface) were placed in the anterior mandible and also that all the patients demonstrated a high level of oral hygiene. [source] Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the 5-mm Diameter Regular-Platform Brånemark Fixture:2- to 5-Year Follow-upCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2002DSc Odont, Georges Tawil DDS ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the clinical results obtained with 5-mm diameter regular-platform Brånemark implants after 2 to 5 years of follow-up. A secondary aim was to compare the clinical outcome to that of adjacently placed standard 3.75-mm fixtures in the same patients under the same operative condition and in the same prosthetic construction. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients, with a mean age of 54 years, received a total of 97 5-mm diameter regular-platform fixtures. The majority of the implants were placed at molar sites. In 41 of the patients, 53 5-mm diameter implants were placed adjacent to 62 standard 3.75-mm diameter fixtures in the same prosthetic reconstruction. All implants were submerged for an average period of 4 to 6 months. Abutment connection was done according to standard protocol. The prosthetic treatment consisted of freestanding fixed bridges. Results: The cumulative survival rate of the 5-mm diameter implants loaded for a period of 2 to 5 years was 96.9%. Only three implants failed. They were placed in type 4 bone in the posterior maxilla. Bone loss over the first year was 0.70 mm and over a 3-year period 0.81 mm. Implants placed in type 4 bone showed significantly higher bone loss. No difference in the resorption rate could be found between the maxillary and the mandibular implants or between the various implant lengths. There was no significant difference between the bone loss around the 5-mm diameter fixtures and the adjacent 3.75-mm diameter standard fixtures. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated a high predictability of 5-mm diameter regular-platform implants when placed in the posterior maxilla and mandible. [source] Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patientsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 4 2006Thomas Von Arx Abstract Objective: To analyze the clinical outcome of horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts covered with anorganic bovine bone mineral (ABBM) and a bioabsorbable collagen membrane. Material and methods: In 42 patients with severe horizontal bone atrophy, a staged approach was chosen for implant placement following horizontal ridge augmentation. A block graft was harvested from the symphysis or retromolar area, and secured to the recipient site with fixation screws. The width of the ridge was measured before and after horizontal ridge augmentation. The block graft was subsequently covered with ABBM and a collagen membrane. Following a tension-free primary wound closure and a mean healing period of 5.8 months, the sites were re-entered, and the crest width was re-assessed prior to implant placement. Results: Fifty-eight sites were augmented, including 41 sites located in the anterior maxilla. The mean initial crest width measured 3.06 mm. At re-entry, the mean width of the ridge was 7.66 mm, with a calculated mean gain of horizontal bone thickness of 4.6 mm (range 2,7 mm). Only minor surface resorption of 0.36 mm was observed from augmentation to re-entry. Conclusions: The presented technique of ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts with ABBM filler and collagen membrane coverage demonstrated successful horizontal ridge augmentation with high predictability. The surgical method has been further simplified by using a resorbable membrane. The hydrophilic membrane was easy to apply, and did not cause wound infection in the rare instance of membrane exposure. [source] |