Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hinge Motion (hinge + motion)
Selected AbstractsStoneHinge: Hinge prediction by network analysis of individual protein structuresPROTEIN SCIENCE, Issue 2 2009Kevin S. Keating Abstract Hinge motions are important for molecular recognition, and knowledge of their location can guide the sampling of protein conformations for docking. Predicting domains and intervening hinges is also important for identifying structurally self-determinate units and anticipating the influence of mutations on protein flexibility and stability. Here we present StoneHinge, a novel approach for predicting hinges between domains using input from two complementary analyses of noncovalent bond networks: StoneHingeP, which identifies domain-hinge-domain signatures in ProFlex constraint counting results, and StoneHingeD, which does the same for DomDecomp Gaussian network analyses. Predictions for the two methods are compared to hinges defined in the literature and by visual inspection of interpolated motions between conformations in a series of proteins. For StoneHingeP, all the predicted hinges agree with hinge sites reported in the literature or observed visually, although some predictions include extra residues. Furthermore, no hinges are predicted in six hinge-free proteins. On the other hand, StoneHingeD tends to overpredict the number of hinges, while accurately pinpointing hinge locations. By determining the consensus of their results, StoneHinge improves the specificity, predicting 11 of 13 hinges found both visually and in the literature for nine different open protein structures, and making no false-positive predictions. By comparison, a popular hinge detection method that requires knowledge of both the open and closed conformations finds 10 of the 13 known hinges, while predicting four additional, false hinges. [source] Conformational flexibility in the flap domains of ligand-free HIV proteaseACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D, Issue 8 2007Holly Heaslet The crystal structures of wild-type HIV protease (HIV PR) in the absence of substrate or inhibitor in two related crystal forms at 1.4 and 2.15,Å resolution are reported. In one crystal form HIV PR adopts an `open' conformation with a 7.7,Å separation between the tips of the flaps in the homodimer. In the other crystal form the tips of the flaps are `curled' towards the 80s loop, forming contacts across the local twofold axis. The 2.3,Å resolution crystal structure of a sixfold mutant of HIV PR in the absence of substrate or inhibitor is also reported. The mutant HIV PR, which evolved in response to treatment with the potent inhibitor TL-3, contains six point mutations relative to the wild-type enzyme (L24I, M46I, F53L, L63P, V77I, V82A). In this structure the flaps also adopt a `curled' conformation, but are separated and not in contact. Comparison of the apo structures to those with TL-3 bound demonstrates the extent of conformational change induced by inhibitor binding, which includes reorganization of the packing between twofold-related flaps. Further comparison with six other apo HIV PR structures reveals that the `open' and `curled' conformations define two distinct families in HIV PR. These conformational states include hinge motion of residues at either end of the flaps, opening and closing the entire ,-loop, and translational motion of the flap normal to the dimer twofold axis and relative to the 80s loop. The alternate conformations also entail changes in the ,-turn at the tip of the flap. These observations provide insight into the plasticity of the flap domains, the nature of their motions and their critical role in binding substrates and inhibitors. [source] Structures of three diphtheria toxin repressor (DtxR) variants with decreased repressor activityACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D, Issue 5 2001Ehmke Pohl The diphtheria toxin repressor (DtxR) from Corynebacterium diphtheriae regulates the expression of the gene on corynebacteriophages that encodes diphtheria toxin (DT). Other genes regulated by DtxR include those that encode proteins involved in siderophore-mediated iron uptake. DtxR requires activation by divalent metals and holo-DtxR is a dimeric regulator with two distinct metal-binding sites per three-domain monomer. At site 1, three side chains and a sulfate or phosphate anion are involved in metal coordination. In the DtxR,DNA complex this anion is replaced by the side chain of Glu170 provided by the third domain of the repressor. At site 2 the metal ion is coordinated exclusively by constituents of the polypeptide chain. In this paper, five crystal structures of three DtxR variants focusing on residues Glu20, Arg80 and Cys102 are reported. The resolution of these structures ranges from 2.3 to 2.8,Å. The side chain of Glu20 provided by the DNA-binding domain forms a salt bridge to Arg80, which in turn interacts with the anion. Replacing either of the salt-bridge partners with an alanine reduces repressor activity substantially and it has been inferred that the salt bridge could possibly control the wedge angle between the DNA-binding domain and the dimerization domain, thereby modulating repressor activity. Cys102 is a key residue of metal site 2 and its substitution into a serine abolishes repressor activity. The crystal structures of Zn-Glu20Ala-DtxR, Zn-Arg80Ala-DtxR, Cd-Cys102Ser-DtxR and apo-Cys102Ser-DtxR in two related space groups reveal that none of these substitutions leads to dramatic rearrangements of the DtxR fold. However, the five crystal structures presented here show significant local changes and a considerable degree of flexibility of the DNA-binding domain with respect to the dimerization domain. Furthermore, all five structures deviate significantly from the structure in the DtxR,DNA complex with respect to overall domain orientation. These results confirm the importance of the hinge motion for repressor activity. Since the third domain has often been invisible in previous crystal structures of DtxR, it is also noteworthy that the SH3-like domain could be traced in four of the five crystal structures. [source] Dynamical view of membrane binding and complex formation of human factor VIIa and tissue factorJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 5 2010Y. Z. OHKUBO Summary.,Background:,The molecular mechanism of enhancement of the enzymatic activity of factor VIIa by tissue factor (TF) is not fully understood, primarily because of the lack of atomic models for the membrane-bound form of the TF,FVIIa complex. Objectives:,To construct the first membrane-bound model of the TF,FVIIa complex, and to investigate the dynamics of the complex in solution and on the surface of anionic membranes by using large-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in full atomic detail. Methods:,Membrane-bound models of the TF,FVIIa complex and the individual factors were constructed and subjected to MD simulations, in order to characterize protein,protein and protein,lipid interactions, and to investigate the dynamics of TF and FVIIa. Results:,The MD trajectories reveal that isolated FVIIa undergoes large structural fluctuation, primarily due to the hinge motions between its domains, whereas soluble TF (sTF) is structurally stable. Upon complex formation, sTF restricts the motion of FVIIa significantly. The results also show that, in the membrane-bound form, sTF directly interacts with the lipid headgroups, even in the absence of FVIIa. Conclusion:,The first atomic models of membrane-bound sTF,FVIIa, FVIIa and sTF are presented, revealing that sTF forms direct contacts with the lipids, both in the isolated form and in complex with FVIIa. The main effect of sTF binding to FVIIa is spatial stabilization of the catalytic site of FVIIa, which ensures optimal interaction with the substrate, FX. [source] Structure of DsbC from Haemophilus influenzaeACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D, Issue 9 2004Man Zhang Bacterial DsbC proteins are involved in rearranging or reducing mismatched disulfide bonds folding within the periplasm. The X-ray structure of the enzyme from Haemophilus influenzae has been solved and compared with the known structure of the Escherichia coli protein. The proteins act as V-shaped dimers with a large cleft to accommodate substrate proteins. The dimers are anchored by a small N-terminal domain, but have a flexible linker region which allows the larger C-terminal domain, with its reactive sulfhydryls, to clamp down on substrates. The overall folds are very similar, but the comparison shows a wider range of hinge motions than previously thought. The crystal packing of the H. influenzae protein allows the movement of the N-terminal domain with respect to the C-terminal domain through motions in the flexible hinge, generating high thermal parameters and unusually high anisotropy in the crystallographic data. [source] | ||||||||||