Home About us Contact | |||
Health Care Coverage (health + care_coverage)
Selected AbstractsLesbian Health Care CoverageNURSING FOR WOMENS HEALTH, Issue 2 2000Lisa A. Audio RN No abstract is available for this article. [source] ALL CHILDREN ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL: PRWORA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL RESTRICTION ON IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S ACCESS TO FEDERAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAMSFAMILY COURT REVIEW, Issue 3 2006Hyejung Janet Shin The lack of health insurance for children is a serious problem in the United States, especially for those children in families that earn too little to get private health insurance and too much to qualify for Medicare. Even within this subclass of children, immigrant children are particularly vulnerable to the problems faced by lack of health care. Nevertheless, with the passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) by Congress, equality interests of low-income immigrant children are undermined when immigrant children are denied federal benefits for the first 5 years of residency in the United States. The first part of this Note examines the importance of child health care and the long-term problems with uninsured children, especially with uninsured immigrant children and pregnant women. The next part introduces Medicaid as well as State Children's Health Insurance Program, a supplemental federal program designed to increase health care coverage to all children, while contrasting these programs in light of the restrictive anti-immigrant PRWORA provisions. The third part explains the passage of PRWORA, its anti-immigrant provisions, and how these provisions prevent needy immigrant children from receiving federally funded health care. Then, the fourth part uses both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to argue the unconstitutionality of the anti-immigrant provisions. Finally, the last part lays out the recommendation to amend the Social Security Act so that the PRWORA barriers can be removed and recent immigrant children can receive federally funded health care. [source] Injury Risk Among Medically Identified Alcohol and Drug AbusersALCOHOLISM, Issue 1 2001Ted R. Miller Background: Although nonfatal injury prevalence is higher among substance abusers than in the general population, few studies have estimated the injury risk for clinically recognized substance abusers. The extant studies, moreover, analyze rates of visits for injury treatment rather than rates of injury events. This study estimates the excess risk of medically treated and hospitalized nonoccupational injury for people under age 65 with medically identified substance abuse problems and private health care coverage. Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using medical claims data from Medstat Systems, Inc., with a longitudinal database of health care claims for 1.5 million people with health care coverage from 70 large corporations. Claims histories for anyone who had an alcohol-related or drug-related primary or secondary diagnosis during 1987 to 1989 were analyzed. A random sample was selected from the remaining people without a substance abuse diagnosis in their medical records. Injury rates were compared among groups. We used logistic regression to estimate odds of medically treated and hospitalized injury, controlling for demographics. Results: Medically identified substance abusers had an elevated risk of injury in a 3-year period; alcohol and drug abusers had the highest risk (58%), followed by drug-only abusers (49%), alcohol-only abusers (46%), and controls (38%). Alcohol and drug abusers were almost four times as likely to be hospitalized for an injury in a 3-year period when compared with controls. Injury risks were elevated substantially more for female then male substance abusers. Conclusions: This study greatly improves on available information about the risk of injury for drug and multiple-substance abusers. Medically identified substance abusers, especially adult women, have a higher probability of injury, more hospitalized injuries, and more injury episodes per person injured than nonabusers. More aggressive identification and subsequent treatment of female substance abusers appear warranted. [source] Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with oral bisphosphonates and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a case-control studyALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 11 2009M. ETMINAN Summary Background, Gastrointestinal injuries including gastric ulcers have been reported with oral bisphosphonate therapy. However, the risk of the more serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGB) especially in the community setting with these drugs remains unknown. Similarly, the risk of UGB among users of both bisphosphonates and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the community is also unknown. Aim, To explore the risk of more serious UGB among users of bisphosphonates and the risk of UGB among users of both bisphosphonates and NSAIDs in the community. Methods, We conducted a case-control study within a cohort of Quebec residents who had received a revascularization procedure from 1995 to 2004. Cohort members were followed up from the date of their first procedure until the earliest of: (1) study outcome, (2) date of death or (3) end of health care coverage. Cases were defined as those with the first diagnosis of a UGB. For each case, 20 controls were selected and matched to the cases by index date, age and cohort entry. Adjusted odds ratios for current use of bisphosphonates, NSAIDs and co-therapy of both drugs were computed. Results, Within the initial cohort, 3253 incident cases of UGBs and corresponding 65 060 matched controls were identified. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for UGB by current users of bisphosphonates was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.72,1.43). Current NSAID use was associated with an increased risk of UGB OR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.53,1.99. The OR for use of bisphosphonates and NSAIDs was elevated OR = 2.00; 95% CI, 1.12,3.57. This risk was still elevated for users of bisphosphonates and COX-2 inhibitors [OR = 2.38 (95% CI, 1.26,4.50)]. Conclusion, We found no evidence of an increase in the risk of UGB among current users of bisphosphonates. The risk of combined NSAID and bisphosphonate therapy was increased, but this risk was not higher than the risk for NSAID users alone. [source] Why Medical Child Support is Important,and ComplexJUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL, Issue 2 2008Susan F. Paikin ABSTRACT Courts resolving child support cases involving separated, divorced, and non-marital children are charged with defining responsibility for health care coverage for the children under that order. This article explores historical and current medical child support requirements under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act,the national child support enforcement ("IV-D") program. It analyzes legal requirements and policy recommendations, and provides a practical tool judges may use to determine whether health care coverage available to either or both parents is appropriate,that is, comprehensive, accessible, and affordable. [source] |