			Home About us Contact

Heterosexual Partners (heterosexual + partner)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	50%

Selected Abstracts

SPERM DONOR OR THWARTED FATHER?

FAMILY COURT REVIEW, Issue 2 2009
HOW WRITTEN AGREEMENT STATUTES ARE CHANGING THE WAY COURTS RESOLVE LEGAL PARENTAGE ISSUES IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION CASES
In recent years, the use of assisted reproduction has risen dramatically in the United States, allowing individuals who face various reproductive challenges, including infertility or absence of a heterosexual partner, to conceive biological children. While assisted reproduction has expanded to meet the needs of these parents, the legal system remains years behind, often leading to complicated child custody disputes between the parties. State legislatures have responded to the call for increased regulation of legal parentage in assisted reproduction in varying ways, although one popular statutory approach requires a known sperm provider to preserve his intention to parent in a written agreement with the woman. This article will argue that written agreement statutes are an effective means for resolving parentage disputes because of their ability to protect pre-insemination intent and encourage private ordering of conflicts among the parties. These issues will be explored through the lens of a recent case decided by the Kansas Supreme Court, In Re K.M.H., where the court enforced a written agreement statute against a sperm provider despite his equal protection and due process challenges. [source]

Social Support and Psychological Well-Being in Lesbian and Heterosexual Preadoptive Couples

FAMILY RELATIONS, Issue 3 2008
Abbie E. Goldberg
Abstract: This study examines predictors of social support and mental health among 36 lesbian and 39 heterosexual couples who were waiting to adopt. Lesbian preadoptive partners perceived less support from family than heterosexual partners but similar levels of support from friends. Lesbian and heterosexual partners reported similar levels of well-being. Aspects of the adoption process were associated with anxiety, whereas couples' conception history was associated with depression. Adoption practitioners should acknowledge these distinct pathways in prevention efforts. [source]

Sexual activity as a risk factor for hepatitis C

HEPATOLOGY, Issue S1 2002
M.P.H., Norah A. Terrault M.D.
The accumulated evidence indicates that hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be transmitted by sexual contact but much less efficiently than other sexually transmitted viruses, including hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, because sex is such a common behavior and the reservoir of HCV-infected individuals is sizable, sexual transmission of HCV likely contributes to the total burden of infection in the United States. Risk of HCV transmission by sexual contact differs by the type of sexual relationship. Persons in long-term monogamous partnerships are at lower risk of HCV acquisition (0% to 0.6% per year) than persons with multiple partners or those at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (0.4% to 1.8% per year). This difference may reflect differences in sexual risk behaviors or differences in rates of exposure to nonsexual sources of HCV, such as injection drug use or shared razors and toothbrushes. In seroprevalence studies in monogamous, heterosexual partners of HCV-infected, HIV-negative persons, the frequency of antibody-positive and genotype-concordant couples is 2.8% to 11% in Southeast Asia, 0% to 6.3% in Northern Europe, and 2.7% in the United States. Among individuals at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), the median seroprevalence of antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) is 4% (range, 1.6% to 25.5%). HIV coinfection appears to increase the rate of HCV transmission by sexual contact. Current recommendations about sexual practices are different for persons with chronic HCV infection who are in steady monogamous partnerships versus those with multiple partners or who are in short-term sexual relationships. (HEPATOLOGY 2002;36:S99,S105). [source]

Intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus: a systematic review

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 2 2000
Ackerman
To examine the risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission between patients infected with HCV and their household members (siblings, offspring and parents), as well as their stable heterosexual partners, a systematic search of the MEDLINE database was undertaken for all relevant articles published up to June 1997. English language publications or those supplemented with an English abstract that reported studies concerning hepatitis C, and household, intrafamilial, sexual and intraspousal transmission of HCV, were reviewed. Data from uncontrolled and controlled studies were collected and analysed separately. Studies reporting the exclusive use of first-generation anti-HCV antibodies without supplemental tests were excluded. Pre- or postnatal mother-to-child transmission of HCV and homosexual and heterosexual transmission of HCV among non-permanent couples were not included. Unweighted data from individual studies were pooled for each category of family member. Data were also analysed separately for Japanese and non-Japanese studies because there is evidence that intrafamilial transmission may differ, based on endemicity of the viral infection. Comparisons were drawn only from controlled studies that reported the prevalence of HCV in family members of both HCV-positive and HCV-negative controls. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each family category. In uncontrolled studies, the pooled prevalence of anti-HCV among 4250 stable sexual contacts of patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease (CLD) was 13.48%, while the pooled prevalence of anti-HCV among 580 stable sexual contacts of patients who contracted HCV as a result of multiple transfusions was 2.41%. In controlled studies, the pooled prevalence of anti-HCV among 175 siblings and household contacts of patients with CLD was 4.0% compared with 0% among 109 contacts of anti-HCV-negative controls (OR 9.75, 95% CI 0.91 ad infinitum). The pooled prevalence of anti-HCV among offspring of Japanese HCV-infected CLD patients was 17% compared with 10.4% among offspring of HCV-negative Japanese controls (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.21,2.58, P=0.002). The pooled prevalence of anti-HCV among spouses of non-Japanese HCV-infected CLD patients was 15.2% compared with 0.9% in the spouses of non-Japanese HCV-negative controls (OR 20.57, 95% CI 6.05,84.08, P=0.0001). The prevalence of anti-HCV among non-Japanese offspring and Japanese spouses of HCV-infected patients was not increased compared with controls. HCV genotype homology and mutant analysis studies in pairs of HCV-infected patients and their HCV-infected contacts showed that concordant genotype homology was found in 66% of non-sexual contacts and in 74% of sexual contacts. Sequence homology of greater than 92% was found in 19 out of 35 pairs. Hence, evidence exists that familial, non-sexual and sexual transmission of HCV does occur. In Japanese patients, transmission probably occurs in younger family members while, in non-Japanese patients, transmission probably occurs at an older age, after contact with an HCV-infected spouse. [source]