Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hatching Period (hatching + period)
Selected AbstractsInterannual variability in hatching period and early growth of juvenile walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, in the Pacific coastal area of HokkaidoFISHERIES OCEANOGRAPHY, Issue 3 2007AKIRA NISHIMURA ABSTRACT Juvenile walleye pollock of the Japanese Pacific population were collected from the Funka Bay [spawning ground; 16,64 mm fork length (FL)] in spring and the Doto area (nursery ground; 70,146 mm FL) in summer. Hatch dates were estimated by subtracting the number of otolith daily increments from sampling dates, and their early growth was back-calculated using otolith radius,somatic length relationships. Interannual change of the hatching period was observed during 2000,02, and the peaks ranged from mid-February in 2000 to early-April in 2002. In 2000, when a strong year class occurred, early life history of the surviving juveniles could be characterized by early hatching and slower growth in the larval stage (<22 mm length). Higher growth rate in 2001 and 2002 did not always lead to good survival and recruitment success. Even though their growth was slow in 2000, the larvae hatched early in the season had larger body size on a given date than faster-growing larvae hatched in later season in 2001 and 2002. Bigger individuals at a certain moment may have advantage for survival. The delay of hatching period may result in higher size-selective mortality, and as a necessary consequence, back-calculated growth in 2001 and 2002 could shift towards higher growth rate, although abundance of such a year class would be at the lower level. Variability in spawning period, early growth and their interaction might have a strong relation to larval survival through cumulative predation pressure or ontogenetic changes in food availability. [source] Breeding biology and success of the Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus in the eastern PyreneesIBIS, Issue 2 2003Antoni Margalida We present data from an extensive study of Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus breeding biology in the Pyrenees from 1992 to 1999. Average laying date was 6 January (range 11 December to 12 February, n = 69) with no significant differences between years. Eighty per cent of clutches were of two eggs (n = 20) and average incubation was 54 days (range 52,56, n = 14). Hatching occurred on average between 21 February and 3 March (range 5 February,7 April) and the first and last chicks fledged in 21,27 May and 20 July, respectively. The average chick age at fledging was 123 days (range 103,133, n = 20). Bearded Vulture density increased significantly during the study period. Breeding success and productivity declined apparently as a consequence of the increase in the percentage of breeding failures during incubation and chick rearing, most during the hatching period. The factors that may determine breeding failure and the decline in breeding performance are analysed and management recommendations for more effective conservation measures are discussed. [source] Effect of the dusk photoperiod change from light to dark on the incubation period of eggs of the spotted rose snapper, Lutjanus guttatus (Steindachner)AQUACULTURE RESEARCH, Issue 4 2008Neil J Duncan Abstract Spotted rose snapper, Lutjanus guttatus (Steindachner), eggs were incubated under different photoperiods to examine the effect of photoperiod on incubation. The eggs from two fish were incubated under five artificial photoperiods: constant dark (D), constant light (L) from 06:00 hours and 6, 10 and 14 h of light from 06:00 hours. The eggs from seven other fish were incubated under a natural photoperiod. Different spawning times (21:00 , 01:00 hours) and different photoperiods combined to give the start of the dusk photoperiod change after 11,23 h of incubation. Constant light or applying the dusk photoperiod change after ,20 h of incubation appeared to extend the hatching period. The mean hatching period for groups of eggs incubated in darkness or that received the dusk photoperiod change after ,19 h of incubation (n=8 different groups) was 2 h 15±10 min, which was significantly lower (P<0.05) than the mean hatching period of 4 h±37 min for groups that did not receive the dusk photoperiod change or that received the dusk photoperiod change after ,20 h of incubation (n=9 groups). However, despite these differences, the majority of the eggs hatched during a 2,3 h period from 17 to 20 h of incubation, and a sigmoid regression (r2=0.9) explained the relationship between percentage hatch and hours of incubation for all photoperiod groups. [source] Early ontogeny of the spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor Olafsen)AQUACULTURE RESEARCH, Issue 12 2003Inger-Britt Falk-Petersen Abstract This study illustrates the embryo development of the spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor Olafsen), an interesting candidate for cold-water aquaculture. The egg morphology (semitransparent, yellow-white with numerous oil droplets in the yolk), size (5.4,6.5 mm) and long embryogenesis (c. 800,1000 d°, depending on temperature) of A. minor are very similar to Anarhichas lupus. Cleavage is slow, and the first cell divisions take place at 12 h at 8°C. After 12 days the 2-mm embryo with the first somites is laid down and the blastopore starts closing. The fat globules in the yolk fuse into one after 22 days, and after 30 days eye pigmentation is noticeable. After 44 days, eye pigmentation is strong, the digestive tract folded and a green gall bladder can be noted in the now 11-mm-long embryo. One week later the blood is brightly red, the intestine is pigmented and the lower jaw is well developed. Premature hatching may occur from this stage. After 58 days vascularization of the yolk is complete, capillaries are noted in the fin fold, the first ray rudiments are established in the tail and pectoral fins, and the four gill arches are covered by the operculum. The preanal finfold is reduced after 72 days, stomach and gill filaments are formed, and six pigmented rows are noted on the 17-mm-long embryo body. After 86 days all fin rays are seen and the digestive tract is intensely pigmented and folded. Hatching (normal) starts after 110 days and may last for 2,3 weeks. Late embryos and early larvae of A. minor have more distinct bands of pigment along the body compared with the closely related A. lupus. An increase in both length and weight of the embryos in individual batches occurs during the hatching period. [source] Differing body size between the autumn and the winter,spring cohorts of neon flying squid (Ommastrephes bartramii) related to the oceanographic regime in the North Pacific: a hypothesisFISHERIES OCEANOGRAPHY, Issue 5 2004Taro Ichii Abstract The neon flying squid (Ommastrephes bartramii), which is the target of an important North Pacific fishery, is comprised of an autumn and winter,spring cohort. During summer, there is a clear separation of mantle length (ML) between the autumn (ML range: 38,46 cm) and the winter,spring cohorts (ML range: 16,28 cm) despite their apparently contiguous hatching periods. We examined oceanic conditions associated with spawning/nursery and northward migration habitats of the two different-sized cohorts. The seasonal meridional movement of the sea surface temperature (SST) range at which spawning is thought to occur (21,25°C) indicates that the spawning ground occurs farther north during autumn (28,34°N) than winter,spring (20,28°N). The autumn spawning ground coincides with the Subtropical Frontal Zone (STFZ), characterized by enhanced productivity in winter because of its close proximity to the Transition Zone Chlorophyll Front (TZCF), which move south to the STFZ from the Subarctic Boundary. Hence this area is thought to become a food-rich nursery ground in winter. The winter,spring spawning ground, on the other hand, coincides with the Subtropical Domain, which is less productive throughout the year. Furthermore, as the TZCF and SST front migrate northward in spring and summer, the autumn cohort has the advantage of being in the SST front and productive area north of the chlorophyll front, whereas the winter,spring cohort remains to the south in a less productive area. Thus, the autumn cohort can utilize a food-rich habitat from winter through summer, which, we hypothesize, causes its members to grow larger than those in the winter,spring cohort in summer. [source] | ||||||||||