Home About us Contact | |||
Habitat Edges (habitat + edge)
Selected AbstractsInfluence of crop edges on movement of generalist predators: a diffusion approachAGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 1 2002Riccardo Bommarco Abstract 1,Diffusion models were applied to recapture data for the generalist predator Pterostichus cupreus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) moving between two adjacent crop habitats (perennial ley and annual barley) first excluding, and then including, terms in the model quantifying the influences of edges on beetle movements. 2,Adult beetles were released at the centre of experimental 3 × 3 m plots that overlapped the edge separating perennial ley (mixed perennial crop of grass and clover) and annual barley crops, both early and later in the growing season. 3,Mathematical description of the data improved when the attractive or repulsive effects of habitat edges on dispersal were considered in the model. 4,Early in the season, when a sharp habitat edge was present, P. cupreus beetles appeared ,attracted' to ley. 5,Diffusion rates were consistently higher in barley than in ley early in the season, and vice versa late in the season. These patterns were probably linked to variation in prey availability. 6,Despite the risk of experiencing food limitation in the annual crop, our analyses suggest that these beetles regularly move from ley into the early barley habitat and then continue to disperse within the barley, providing opportunities for enhanced biological control of pest species. [source] Ecological correlates of vulnerability to fragmentation in Neotropical batsJOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2008Christoph F. J. Meyer Summary 1In the face of widespread human-induced habitat fragmentation, identification of those ecological characteristics that render some species more vulnerable to fragmentation than others is vital for understanding, predicting and mitigating the effects of habitat alteration on biodiversity. We compare hypotheses on the causes of interspecific differences in fragmentation sensitivity using distribution and abundance data collected on 23 species of Neotropical bats. 2Bats were captured over a 2-year period on 11 land-bridge islands in Gatún Lake, Panama, and on the adjacent mainland. We derived a series of explanatory variables from our capture data and from the literature: (1) natural abundance in continuous forest, (2) body mass, (3) trophic level, (4) dietary specialization, (5) vertical stratification, (6) edge-sensitivity, (7) mobility, (8) wing morphology (aspect ratio and relative wing loading) and (9) ecologically scaled landscape indices (ESLIs). After phylogenetic correction, these variables were used separately and in combination to assess their association with two indices of fragmentation sensitivity, species prevalence (proportion of islands occupied) as well as an index of change in abundance. 3Model selection based on Akaike's information criterion identified edge-sensitivity as the best correlate of vulnerability to fragmentation. Natural abundance and mobility or traits linked to mobility (relative wing loading and ESLI) received limited support as predictors. Vulnerability of gleaning animalivorous bats is probably caused by a combination of these traits. 4Synthesis and applications. Our findings emphasize the importance of a local-scale approach in developing predictive models of species fragmentation sensitivity and indicate that risk assessments of Neotropical bats could be based on species tolerance to habitat edges and mobility-related traits. We suggest that, in order to be effective, management efforts should aim to minimize the amount of edge-habitat and reduce the degree of fragment-matrix contrast. Moreover, if high bat diversity is to be preserved in fragmented Neotropical landscapes, conservation measures regarding reserve design should assure spatial proximity to source populations in larger tracts of continuous forest and a low degree of remnant isolation. [source] Comparative dynamics of avian communities across edges and interiors of North American ecoregionsJOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, Issue 4 2006Krithi K. Karanth Abstract Aim, Based on a priori hypotheses, we developed predictions about how avian communities might differ at the edges vs. interiors of ecoregions. Specifically, we predicted lower species richness and greater local turnover and extinction probabilities for regional edges. We tested these predictions using North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data across nine ecoregions over a 20-year time period. Location, Data from 2238 BBS routes within nine ecoregions of the United States were used. Methods, The estimation methods used accounted for species detection probabilities < 1. Parameter estimates for species richness, local turnover and extinction probabilities were obtained using the program COMDYN. We examined the difference in community-level parameters estimated from within exterior edges (the habitat interface between ecoregions), interior edges (the habitat interface between two bird conservation regions within the same ecoregion) and interior (habitat excluding interfaces). General linear models were constructed to examine sources of variation in community parameters for five ecoregions (containing all three habitat types) and all nine ecoregions (containing two habitat types). Results, Analyses provided evidence that interior habitats and interior edges had on average higher bird species richness than exterior edges, providing some evidence of reduced species richness near habitat edges. Lower average extinction probabilities and turnover rates in interior habitats (five-region analysis) provided some support for our predictions about these quantities. However, analyses directed at all three response variables, i.e. species richness, local turnover, and local extinction probability, provided evidence of an interaction between habitat and region, indicating that the relationships did not hold in all regions. Main conclusions, The overall predictions of lower species richness, higher local turnover and extinction probabilities in regional edge habitats, as opposed to interior habitats, were generally supported. However, these predicted tendencies did not hold in all regions. [source] Influence of crop edges on movement of generalist predators: a diffusion approachAGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 1 2002Riccardo Bommarco Abstract 1,Diffusion models were applied to recapture data for the generalist predator Pterostichus cupreus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) moving between two adjacent crop habitats (perennial ley and annual barley) first excluding, and then including, terms in the model quantifying the influences of edges on beetle movements. 2,Adult beetles were released at the centre of experimental 3 × 3 m plots that overlapped the edge separating perennial ley (mixed perennial crop of grass and clover) and annual barley crops, both early and later in the growing season. 3,Mathematical description of the data improved when the attractive or repulsive effects of habitat edges on dispersal were considered in the model. 4,Early in the season, when a sharp habitat edge was present, P. cupreus beetles appeared ,attracted' to ley. 5,Diffusion rates were consistently higher in barley than in ley early in the season, and vice versa late in the season. These patterns were probably linked to variation in prey availability. 6,Despite the risk of experiencing food limitation in the annual crop, our analyses suggest that these beetles regularly move from ley into the early barley habitat and then continue to disperse within the barley, providing opportunities for enhanced biological control of pest species. [source] Response of fauna in seagrass to habitat edges, patch attributes and hydrodynamicsAUSTRAL ECOLOGY, Issue 5 2010HANNAH M. MURPHY Abstract This study has investigated the taxon-specific responses of fauna to patch edges, and how these relate to patch attributes (patch size, seagrass biomass and water depth), and hydrodynamics in the seagrass habitat. Faunal abundances were sampled at the edge, 2 m in from the edge, and in the middle of 10 seagrass patches of variable size in Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Five of nine taxa showed edge effects. There were higher abundances at the edge compared with the middle for porcellid harpacticoids, and an increase in abundance from the edge to the middle of the patches for tanaids and isopods. For caprellid and gammarid amphipods, the edge effect varied across patches. Changes in current within the patch and patch size were related to the variability in the edge effect pattern of caprellids. None of the measured environmental variables (seagrass biomass, current and water depth) or patch size had a role in the variable edge effect pattern of gammarid amphipods. At the patch level, the distribution of six of nine taxa in this study, namely isopods, polychaetes, ,other harpacticoids', porcellid harpacticoids, cumaceans and gammarid amphipods, was related to differences in average water depth, average seagrass biomass and patch size. Our study indicates that the faunal response to edges cannot be generalized across seagrass habitat, and the implications of habitat area loss will vary depending on the taxon under consideration. [source] |