Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
HLA Antibodies (hla + antibody)
Selected AbstractsHLA antibody testing: a tool to facilitate not to prevent organ transplantationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOGENETICS, Issue 4-5 2008Frans H. J. Claas Summary The introduction of very sensitive HLA antibody screening assays has destroyed the old dogma that pre-existence of donor specific HLA antibodies in the patient is a contra-indication for transplantation. The challenge is now to reach consensus on the parameters which predict the clinical relevance of donor specific HLA antibodies. Antibody screening assays should not only be used to prevent transplantation of patients with donor specific antibodies but also to facilitate transplantation of highly sensitized patients, both by defining acceptable HLA mismatches and non-detrimental donor specific HLA antibodies. [source] Review article: Luminex technology for HLA antibody detection in organ transplantationNEPHROLOGY, Issue 2 2009BRIAN D TAIT SUMMARY Since its inception in the early 1960s, the serologically based complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay has been the cornerstone technique for the detection of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, not only in pre-transplant renal patients, but also in other forms of organ transplantation. Recently, solid phase assays have been developed and introduced for this purpose, and in particular the Flow-based bead assays such as the Luminex system. This latter assay has proved to be far more sensitive than the CDC assay and has revealed pre-sensitization in potential transplant recipients not detected by other methods of HLA antibody detection. However, the clinical implications of this increased sensitivity have not been convincingly demonstrated until recently. This technology for HLA antibody detection permits the evaluation of the clinical importance of antibodies directed at, for example, HLA-DPB1 and HLA-DQA1, which has not been possible to date. There are Luminex issues, however, requiring resolution such as the ability to distinguish between complement fixing and non-complement fixing antibodies and determination of their relative clinical significance. Luminex technology will permit a re-evaluation of the role of HLA antibodies in both early and late antibody-mediated rejection. [source] Sirolimus is not always responsible for new-onset proteinuria after conversion for chronic allograft nephropathyPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2007Zainab Abdurrahman Abstract:, An eight-yr-old combined liver and kidney transplant recipient for hyperoxaluria type I developed significant proteinuria and hypertension after conversion of a Tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids-based immunosuppression to Sirolimus, low-dose Tacrolimus, and corticosteroids six and a half yr after the transplant for chronic allograft nephropathy. There was only one class I HLA match and the recipient had multiple blood exposures prior to transplantation. The patient was treated with combined hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis while awaiting transplantation to reduce the oxalate load. A renal biopsy revealed a de novo transplant glomerulopathy that was associated with specific HLA antibodies unrelated to the donor (HLA DR 17 and 18). After reintroduction of MMF, these antibodies became undetectable and the proteinuria completely resolved. We hypothesize that HLA antibodies may cause transplant glomerulopathy even if they are not donor-specific. Their production appears more susceptible to MMF therapy. A thorough work-up of new-onset proteinuria after conversion to Sirolimus should be performed, including an immunological work-up and a renal biopsy. [source] An Integrated View of Molecular Changes, Histopathology and Outcomes in Kidney TransplantsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2010P. F. Halloran Data-driven approaches to deteriorating kidney transplants, incorporating histologic, molecular and HLA antibody findings, have created a new understanding of transplant pathology and why transplants fail. Transplant dysfunction is best understood in terms of three elements: diseases, the active injury,repair response and the cumulative burden of injury. Progression to failure is mainly attributable to antibody-mediated rejection, nonadherence and glomerular disease. Antibody-mediated rejection usually develops late due to de novo HLA antibodies, particularly anti-class II, and is often C4d negative. Pure treated T cell-mediated rejection does not predispose to graft loss because it responds well, even with endothelialitis, but it may indicate nonadherence. The cumulative burden of injury results in atrophy-fibrosis (nephron loss), arterial fibrous intimal thickening and arteriolar hyalinosis, but these are not progressive without ongoing disease/injury, and do not explain progression. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity has been overestimated because burden-of-injury lesions invite this default diagnosis when diseases such as antibody-mediated rejection are missed. Disease/injury triggers a stereotyped active injury,repair response, including de-differentiation, cell cycling and apoptosis. The active injury,repair response is the strongest correlate of organ function and future progression to failure, but should always prompt a search for the initiating injury or disease. [source] Evidence for Humoral Rejection of a Pancreatic Islet Graft and Rescue with Rituximab and IV Immunoglobulin TherapyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009L. Kessler We describe the decline in islet function, in relation to HLA sensitization, in an islet transplant recipient and the recovery of this function after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and IV immunoglobulins. A 51-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes received one intraportal islet infusion. Following this transplantation, she became insulin independent. A search for HLA antibodies by using an ELISA technique remained consistently negative for HLA class I and II. It was only 2 years after the islet transplantation that this search became positive against class II antigens, reaching a peak of reactivity concomitantly with the appearance of a deterioration of glucose control requiring low-dose insulin therapy. Luminex® screening and single-antigen assays then revealed the presence of both nondonor-specific and donor-specific antibodies against HLA class II molecules. This immunization, already present in the pretransplant serum, had increased during the 6 months preceding the clinical deterioration. Since these data nevertheless pointed to antibody-mediated rejection of the islet allograft, treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and IV immunoglobulins was initiated. One month later, the search by ELISA for antibodies against HLA class II antigens became negative, the Luminex® tests normalizing more gradually. As the result of an improvement in glucose control, the patient was again insulin-free. [source] Susceptibility of Liver Allografts to High or Low Concentrations of Preformed Antibodies as Measured by Flow CytometryAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2001Juan C. Scornik Liver grafts are more resistant to damage by HLA antibodies than other organ allografts, but it is not clear if the antibodies are associated with graft rejection or graft loss, or if different antibody concentrations have different effects. To explore potential associations between antibody concentrations and outcome, preformed IgG antibodies against donor cells were quantified by flow cytometry in 465 consecutive liver transplant recipients. Antibody-positive patients were classified according to whether they had high or low antibody concentrations and analyzed for possible correlation with graft rejection or graft loss. The results showed that the incidence of rejection was not significantly different between antibody-positive and -negative patients. However, patients with high antibody concentrations had a higher incidence of steroid-resistant rejections (31% at 1 year) than patients with low antibody (4%) or no antibody (8%, p <,0.0004). These effects were mainly due to T-cell (HLA class I) antibodies. The overall incidence of rejection at 1 year was 69% for high antibody patients, 51% for patients with low antibodies and 53% for patients with no antibodies (p not significant). In an apparent paradox, antibody-positive patients underwent fewer early graft losses. Thus, the associations of preformed antibodies and outcome depend, on the one hand, on antibody concentrations, and on the other hand on whether the outcome measured is steroid-sensitive rejection, steroid-resistant rejection or graft survival. These complex interactions may explain the controversial results observed in previous studies. [source] Antibody-Mediated Microcirculation Injury Is the Major Cause of Late Kidney Transplant FailureAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2009G. Einecke We studied the phenotype of late kidney graft failure in a prospective study of unselected kidney transplant biopsies taken for clinical indications. We analyzed histopathology, HLA antibodies and death-censored graft survival in 234 consecutive biopsies from 173 patients, taken 6 days to 31 years posttransplant. Patients with late biopsies (>1 year) frequently displayed donor-specific HLA antibody (particularly class II) and microcirculation changes, including glomerulitis, glomerulopathy, capillaritis, capillary multilayering and C4d staining. Grafts biopsied early rarely failed (1/68), whereas grafts biopsied late often progressed to failure (27/105) within 3 years. T-cell-mediated rejection and its lesions were not associated with an increased risk of failure after biopsy. In multivariable analysis, graft failure correlated with microcirculation inflammation and scarring, but C4d staining was not significant. When microcirculation changes and HLA antibody were used to define antibody-mediated rejection, 17/27 (63%) of late kidney failures after biopsy were attributable to antibody-mediated rejection, but many were C4d negative and missed by current diagnostic criteria. Glomerulonephritis accounted for 6/27 late losses, whereas T-cell-mediated rejection, drug toxicity and unexplained scarring were uncommon. The major cause of late kidney transplant failure is antibody-mediated microcirculation injury, but detection of this phenotype requires new diagnostic criteria. [source] HLA Class I Antibodies Provoke Graft Arteriosclerosis in Human Arteries Transplanted into SCID/Beige MiceAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2009S. Galvani Antibodies toward HLA class I and/or MICA are commonly observed in transplanted patients suffering from allograft arteriosclerosis, also called chronic vascular rejection (CVR). The relative importance of cellular versus humoral alloreactivity for CVR is still disputed. We demonstrate that antibodies toward HLA class I provoke lesions typical for CVR in human arteries in vivo in the absence of cellular immunity. To show this, we grafted segments of human mesenteric arteries from 8 deceased organ donors into 36 immunodeficient SCID/beige mice in the infrarenal aortic position. Three mice died postoperatively. The remaining 33 mice received weekly i.v. injections of either a monoclonal antibody toward HLA class I, toward MICA or an irrelevant monoclonal antibody. At sacrifice after 6 weeks, mice receiving the HLA antibody showed a significant neointimal thickening in the grafted artery due to smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation while control mice receiving anti-MICA or irrelevant antibody showed little or no thickening. Whereas antibodies toward HLA class I were mitogenic to SMC in vitro, those directed toward MICA did not have any effect. Humoral alloreactivity toward HLA may thus play a causal role for the development of CVR and this opens new possibilities for the treatment of CVR. [source] | ||||||||||