			Home About us Contact

HBIG Administration (hbig + administration)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Distribution within Medical Sciences

Transplantation	60%
Hepatology	40%

Selected Abstracts

A randomized study of adefovir dipivoxil in place of HBIG in combination with lamivudine as post,liver transplantation hepatitis B prophylaxis,

HEPATOLOGY, Issue 5 2008
Peter W. Angus
Prior to effective prophylaxis, liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease was frequently complicated by recurrence, which could be severe and rapidly progressive. Combination hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine prophylaxis reduces this rate of recurrence to <5% at 5 years; however, HBIG administration is costly and inconvenient. We conducted a multicenter randomized study of adefovir dipivoxil substitution for low-dose intramuscular (IM) HBIG in patients without HBV recurrence at least 12 months posttransplantation for HBV-related disease. Thirty-four patients were randomized, 16 to adefovir (1 patient withdrew consent at 3 months and is not considered in the results) and 18 to continue HBIG. All continued lamivudine. Groups were well matched by age, sex, and time since transplantation (median, 4.5 years), and background virological risk for HBV recurrence (30% of patients in the adefovir group, 24% in the HBIG group having detectable HBV DNA at transplantation). All patients were alive at study completion without recurrence. One patient in the adefovir group became hepatitis B surface antigen,positive at 5 months but was persistently HBV DNA undetectable via polymerase chain reaction (sensitivity 14 IU/mL) over the following 20 months. Median creatinine was not significantly changed over the course of the study in either group. One patient in the adefovir group with a background of diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy (baseline creatinine 150 ,mol/L) developed increased creatinine leading to dose reduction and ultimately cessation of adefovir at 15 months. Yearly cost of combination adefovir/lamivudine prophylaxis was $8,290 versus $13,718 IM HBIG/lamivudine. Conclusion: Compared with combination HBIG plus lamivudine prophylaxis, combination adefovir plus lamivudine provides equivalent protection against recurrent HBV infection but with better tolerability and less cost. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.) [source]

Double-dose double-phase use of second generation hepatitis B virus vaccine in patients after living donor liver transplantation: Not an effective measure in transplant recipients

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, Issue 1 2009
Noriyo Yamashiki
Aims:, Post-transplant active immunization for chronic hepatitis B patients has been attempted in several studies with controversial results. We assessed the effect of a double-dose double-phase vaccination regimen among partial living donor liver recipients. Methods:, Eighteen patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for chronic hepatitis B and two non-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients who received hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donor organs were recruited 18,78 months after LT. All were on hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) mono-prophylaxis before and throughout vaccination, to maintain hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titers of more than 100 IU/mL. Recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine (40 µg) was administered intramuscularly during weeks 0, 4, 8, 24, 28 and 32. Results:, The patients consisted of 15 males and five females with a median age of 52 (39,59) years. None developed a sufficient HBsAb titer above 500 IU/mL by week 48. In two patients whose maximum HBsAb titer increased to above 300 IU/mL, we attempted to skip HBIG, but shortly thereafter the titer dropped below 100 IU/mL and HBIG administration was resumed. Although the HBIG dose was reduced during and after vaccination, cessation of administration was not achieved. Conclusion:, Double-dose double-phase use of second generation recombinant vaccine was not effective in this study population. The selected population should be targeted for a conventional vaccine regimen, and different approaches, such as strong adjuvant or pre-S containing protein, should be further tested in a larger number of patients after LT for chronic hepatitis B. [source]

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis B cirrhosis

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2003
Yasuhiko Sugawara
The living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) experience for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still limited. Because LDLT can be performed electively, it can provide an appropriate length of time to reduce HBV DNA levels before the operation. This study aims to examine the feasibility of our protocol for preventing HBV reinfection after LDLT. Of 20 patients analyzed, 15 patients had detectable serum HBV DNA when referred to our hospital. Thirteen patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. All patients were treated with lamivudine (100 mg/d) before LDLT. After LDLT, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was administered to maintain serum antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers at greater than 1,000 IU/mL for 1 year and 200 IU/mL thereafter. Lamivudine was not administered postoperatively, except for three patients with detectable serum HBV DNA just before LDLT. All patients survived the operation. One patient died 229 days after LDLT of carcinoma recurrence. In the other 19 patients, liver function has remained normal and no viral relapse occurred postoperatively during a median follow-up of 19 months. Perioperative use of lamivudine and indefinite HBIG administration in the postoperative period might be a rational strategy for preventing HBV reinfection after LDLT. [source]

Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen and Polymerase Mutations in Liver Transplant Recipients Pre- and Post-Transplant

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2003
Jeffrey J. Germer
We evaluated serum samples from 18 chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients who underwent liver transplantation for the presence of HBV polymerase and S gene mutations and HBV genotype using a new commercially available sequencing assay. All three patients with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) treatment failure followed by nucleoside analogue treatment failure were infected with HBV genotype C; a pre-existing HBV S antigen (HBsAg) mutation (sD144A) was identified in one patient pretransplant, while sG145R mutations emerged in the other two patients post-transplant. These HBsAg mutations persisted for the duration of the study (5,6 years), despite the absence of HBIG administration for a 4,5-year period. Significant viral polymerase mutations (rtL180M and rtM204I/V) also emerged in all of these patients following treatment with lamivudine and/or famciclovir. Four of six patients with HBIG breakthrough without nucleoside analogue treatment failure yielded potentially significant HBsAg mutations post transplant. These data do not support previous reports highlighting the disappearance of HBsAg mutants in liver transplant recipients after discontinuation of HBIG. Determination of HBV genotype, as well as identification of HBV polymerase and S gene mutations in liver transplant candidates may be warranted to optimize HBV management strategies post transplant. [source]

Subcutaneous administration of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine following orthotopic liver transplantation: effective prophylaxis against recurrence

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2006
James J. Powell
Abstract:, Prophylaxis against recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), in combination with antiviral agents such as lamivudine, has allowed transplantation for this condition to become feasible and accepted. Current protocols allow for HBIG administration either intravenously or intramuscularly. To date, there has been no reported experience with the subcutaneous route of post-transplant HBIG delivery. We report our experience of a 60-yr-old man for whom liver transplantation was performed for chronic HBV. HBIG was administered intramuscularly during the anhepatic phase of surgery. The finding of a portal vein thrombosis requiring repeated thrombectomy necessitated chronic anticoagulation. Post-operatively, HBIG was administered subcutaneously, in four separate injections, for a daily dose of 2170 IU along with continued lamivudine dosing. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titres reached a serum concentration of >500 IU/L by seven d post-transplant and approximately 1000 IU/L by nine d post-transplant. Five months post-transplant, with continued combination of subcutaneous HBIG and lamivudine, there has been no recurrent HBV infection and anti-HBs titres have been at target levels. Our experience suggests that subcutaneous delivery of HBIG may be a feasible consideration when intramuscular/intravenous dosing is not possible. [source]