			Home About us Contact

Guideline Adherence (guideline + adherence)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Impact of quality circles for improvement of asthma care: results of a randomized controlled trial

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 2 2008
Antonius Schneider MD
Abstract Rationale and aims, Quality circles (QCs) are well established as a means of aiding doctors. New quality improvement strategies include benchmarking activities. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the efficacy of QCs for asthma care working either with general feedback or with an open benchmark. Methods, Twelve QCs, involving 96 general practitioners, were organized in a randomized controlled trial. Six worked with traditional anonymous feedback and six with an open benchmark; both had guided discussion from a trained moderator. Forty-three primary care practices agreed to give out questionnaires to patients to evaluate the efficacy of QCs. Results, A total of 256 patients participated in the survey, of whom 185 (72.3%) responded to the follow-up 1 year later. Use of inhaled steroids at baseline was high (69%) and self-management low (asthma education 27%, individual emergency plan 8%, and peak flow meter at home 21%). Guideline adherence in drug treatment increased (P = 0.19), and asthma steps improved (P = 0.02). Delivery of individual emergency plans increased (P = 0.008), and unscheduled emergency visits decreased (P = 0.064). There was no change in asthma education and peak flow meter usage. High medication guideline adherence was associated with reduced emergency visits (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07,0.89). Use of theophylline was associated with hospitalization (OR 7.1; 95% CI 1.5,34.3) and emergency visits (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.6,14.7). There was no difference between traditional and benchmarking QCs. Conclusions, Quality circles working with individualized feedback are effective at improving asthma care. The trial may have been underpowered to detect specific benchmarking effects. Further research is necessary to evaluate strategies for improving the self-management of asthma patients. [source]

Effects of implementation of psychiatric guidelines on provider performance and patient outcome: systematic review

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2007
S. Weinmann
Objective:, To identify evidence from comparative studies on the effects of psychiatric guideline implementation on provider performance and patient outcome. Effects of different implementation strategies were reviewed. Method:, Articles published between 1966 and March 2006 were searched through electronic databases and hand search. A systematic review of comparative studies of structured implementation of specific psychiatric guidelines was performed. Rates of guideline adherence, provider performance data, illness detection and diagnostic accuracy rates were extracted in addition to patient relevant outcome data. Results:, Eighteen studies (nine randomized-controlled trials, six non-randomized-controlled studies and three quasiexperimental before-and-after studies) were identified. Effects on provider performance or patient outcome were moderate and temporary in most cases. Studies with positive outcomes used complex multifaceted interventions or specific psychological methods to implement guidelines. Conclusion:, There is insufficient high-quality evidence to draw firm conclusions on the effects of implementation of specific psychiatric guidelines. [source]

Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategy Patterns in Veterans Affairs Primary Care Clinics

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, Issue 1p1 2007
Sylvia J. Hysong
Background. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandated the system-wide implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in the mid-1990s, arming all facilities with basic resources to facilitate implementation; despite this resource allocation, significant variability still exists across VA facilities in implementation success. Objective. This study compares CPG implementation strategy patterns used by high and low performing primary care clinics in the VA. Research Design. Descriptive, cross-sectional study of a purposeful sample of six Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) with high and low performance on six CPGs. Subjects. One hundred and two employees (management, quality improvement, clinic personnel) involved with guideline implementation at each VAMC primary care clinic. Measures. Participants reported specific strategies used by their facility to implement guidelines in 1-hour semi-structured interviews. Facilities were classified as high or low performers based on their guideline adherence scores calculated through independently conducted chart reviews. Findings. High performing facilities (HPFs) (a) invested significantly in the implementation of the electronic medical record and locally adapting it to provider needs, (b) invested dedicated resources to guideline-related initiatives, and (c) exhibited a clear direction in their strategy choices. Low performing facilities exhibited (a) earlier stages of development for their electronic medical record, (b) reliance on preexisting resources for guideline implementation, with little local adaptation, and (c) no clear direction in their strategy choices. Conclusion. A multifaceted, yet targeted, strategic approach to guideline implementation emphasizing dedicated resources and local adaptation may result in more successful implementation and higher guideline adherence than relying on standardized resources and taxing preexisting channels. [source]

Improved guideline adherence to pharmacotherapy of chronic systolic heart failure in general practice , results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of implementation of a clinical practice guideline

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 5 2008
Frank Peters-Klimm MD
Abstract Rationale and aims, Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) reflect the evidence of effective pharmacotherapy of chronic (systolic) heart failure (CHF) which needs to be implemented. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a new, multifaceted intervention (educational train-the-trainer course plus pharmacotherapy feedback = TTT) compared with standard education on guideline adherence (GA) in general practice. Method, Thirty-seven participating general practitioners (GPs) were randomized (18 vs. 19) and included 168 patients with ascertained symptomatic CHF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV]. Groups received CPG, the TTT intervention consisted of four interactive educational meetings and a pharmacotherapy feedback, while the control group received a usual lecture (Standard). Outcome measure was GA assessed by prescription rates and target dosing of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB) and aldosterone antagonists (AA) at baseline and 7-month follow-up. Group comparisons at follow-up were adjusted to GA, sex, age and NYHA stage at baseline. Results, Prescription rates at baseline (n = 168) were high (ACE-I/ARB 90, BB 79 and AA 29%) in both groups. At follow up (n = 146), TTT improved compared with Standard regarding AA (43% vs. 23%, P = 0.04) and the rates of reached target doses of ACE-I/ARB (28% vs. 15%, P = 0.04). TTT group achieved significantly higher mean percentages of daily target dose (52% vs. 42%, mean difference 10.3%, 95% CI 0.84,19.8, P = 0.03). Conclusion, Despite of pre-existing high GA in both groups and an active control group, the multifaceted intervention was effective in quality of care measured by GA. Further research is needed on the choice of interventions in different provider populations. [source]

Impact of quality circles for improvement of asthma care: results of a randomized controlled trial

Asthma patients with low perceived burden of illness: a challenge for guideline adherence

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 6 2007
Antonius Schneider MD
Abstract Rationale and aims, The reason why many patients seem to tolerate suffering from sub-optimal treated asthma remains unclear. The aim was to evaluate the guideline adherence combined with quality of life of patients with moderate to severe asthma. Methods, 256 asthma patients from 43 primary care practices in Saxony-Anhalt filled in a questionnaire including the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D) and questions evaluating the asthma severity, medication and self-management. Results, 43.4% suffered from moderate to severe asthma. Drug treatment accorded with guidelines in 36.9%, drug dosage of inhaled steroids was too low in 34.3%, and 21.5% were not treated according to guidelines. A total of 7.3% of the patients received end-of-dose therapy. AQLQ declined and depression rose with asthma severity and guideline non-adherence (P < 0.001). Only 29.1% received asthma education. However, 64.5% of the patients without education did not want to receive education. They had a higher quality of life, lower depression (P < 0.001) and lower use of steroids (P = 0.016). Higher depression scores where related with hospital admission (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.57,6.87 for each quartile of PHQ-D) and unscheduled home visits or ambulatory care (OR 1.58; 1.07,2.33). Conclusion, There is a large variation of asthma severity which can partly be explained by the guideline adherence of medication and deficits of patients' management. The perceived burden of illness plays a more important role for education and self-management than the real severity of disease. Therefore, target-oriented interventions are needed to identify and motivate patients at risk. [source]

Measuring physiotherapists' guideline adherence by means of clinical vignettes: a validation study

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 5 2006
Geert M.J. Rutten MPH
Abstract Rationale, aims and objectives, To assess the criterion validity of paper-and-pencil vignettes to assess guideline adherence by physiotherapists in the Netherlands. The evidence-based physiotherapy practice guideline for low back pain was used as an example. Methods, Four vignettes were constructed and pre-tested. Three vignettes were found to represent an adequate case-mix. They described one patient with specific low back pain, one with non-specific low back pain and a normal recovery process and one with non-specific low back pain and a delay in the recovery process. Invited to participate were 113 primary care physiotherapists who had joined an randomized controlled trial study 8 months before, in which guideline adherence had been measured by means of semi-structured treatment recording forms. The criterion validity was determined with Spearman's rs, using Cohen's classification for the behavioural sciences to categorize its effect size. Results, Of the 72 physiotherapists who agreed to participate, 39 completed the questions on the vignettes. In the end, both adherence measures were available for 34 participants, providing 102 vignettes and 268 recording forms. Mean guideline adherence scores were 57% (SD = 17) when measured by vignettes and 74% (SD = 15) when measured by recording forms. Spearman's rs was 0.31 (P = 0.036), which, according to Cohen's classification, is a medium effect size. Conclusion, Vignettes are of acceptable validity, and are an inexpensive and manageable instrument to measure guideline adherence among large groups of physiotherapists. Further validation studies could benefit from the use of standardized patients as a gold standard, a more diverse case mix to better reflect real physiotherapy practice, and the inclusion of longitudinal vignettes that cover the patients' course of treatment. [source]

Provider-perceived barriers and facilitators for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) guideline adherence

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 2 2004
Gail M. Powell-Cope PhD ARNP
Abstract Rationale, aims and objectives, Clinical practice guidelines have become a standard way of implementing evidence-based practice, yet research has shown that clinicians do not always follow guidelines. Method, As part of a larger study to test the effects of an intervention on provider adherence to ischaemic heart disease (IHD) guidelines, we conducted five focus groups at three Veterans Administration Medical Centers with 32 primary care providers, cardiologists, and internists to identify key barriers and facilitators to adherence of the guidelines. Using content analysis, responses were grouped into categories. Results, The main perceived advantages of using the IHD guidelines were improvements in quality and the cost of care. Perceived barriers were the lack of ability of guidelines to manage the care of any one individual patient, the difficulty of accessing guidelines, and high workloads with many complex patients. While providers agreed on the benefits of aspirin, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, barriers for use of these medications were lack of consensus about contraindications, difficulty in providing follow-up during medication titration, and lack of patient adherence. Sources of influence for guideline use were: professional cardiology organizations, colleagues, mainly cardiologists, and key cardiology journals. However, most providers acknowledged that following guidelines was a personal practice decision. Conclusions, While results validated the influences of using clinical practice guidelines, our results highlight the importance of ascertaining guideline-specific barriers for building effective interventions to improve provider adherence. An advisory panel reviewed results and, using a modified nominal group process, chose implementation strategies targeting key barriers. [source]

A multidisciplinary guideline for the acute phase of stroke: barriers perceived by Dutch neurologists

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 2 2004
Trudy Van Der Weijden PhD MD
Abstract Rationale, aims and objectives, Guidelines for stroke management should improve quality of care. Dissemination of guidelines, however, does not guarantee guideline adherence. The aim of this paper is to investigate barriers for guideline adherence to bring about suggestions for possible implementation strategies. Method, Questionnaire survey among all Dutch neurologists working on neurology wards in general hospitals during the year 2000 in The Netherlands. Results, The neurologists expressed a high degree of agreement with the diagnostic and preventive recommendations, but expressed doubts with regard to the therapeutic recommendations, especially for the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy. In general, barriers at the organizational and the multidisciplinary team level were most prominent. Conclusions, Active implementation of the guidelines seems necessary. Implementation strategies should be focused on the different sources of barriers: the caregiver, the patient and the organization of care. [source]

Adherence to best practice guidelines in dyspepsia: a survey comparing dyspepsia experts, community gastroenterologists and primary-care providers

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 8 2009
B. M. R. SPIEGEL
Summary Background, Although ,best practice' guidelines for dyspepsia management have been disseminated, it remains unclear whether providers adhere to these guidelines. Aim, To compare adherence to ,best practice' guidelines among dyspepsia experts, community gastroenterologists and primary-care providers (PCPs). Methods, We administered a vignette survey to elicit knowledge and beliefs about dyspepsia including a set of 16 best practices, to three groups: (i) dyspepsia experts; (ii) community gastroenterologists and (iii) PCPs. Results, The expert, community gastroenterologist and PCP groups endorsed 75%, 73% and 57% of best practices respectively. Gastroenterologists were more likely to adhere with guidelines than PCPs (P < 0.0001). PCPs were more likely to define dyspepsia incorrectly, overuse radiographic testing, delay endoscopy, treat empirically for Helciobacter pylori without confirmatory testing and avoid first-line proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). PCPs had more concerns about adverse events with PPIs [e.g. osteoporosis (P = 0.04), community-acquired pneumonia (P = 0.01)] and higher level of concern predicted lower guideline adherence (P = 0.04). Conclusions, Gastroenterologists are more likely than PCPs to comply with best practices in dyspepsia, although compliance remains incomplete in both groups. PCPs harbour more concerns regarding long-term PPI use and these concerns may affect therapeutic decision making. This suggests that best practices have not been uniformly adopted and persistent guideline-practice disconnects should be addressed. [source]

Physician peer assessments for compliance with methadone maintenance treatment guidelines

THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue 4 2007
Carol Strike PhD
Abstract Introduction: Medical associations and licensing bodies face pressure to implement quality assurance programs, but evidence-based models are lacking. To improve the quality of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT), the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Canada, conducts an innovative quality assurance program on the basis of peer assessments. Using data from this program, we assessed physician compliance with MMT guidelines and determined whether physician factors (e.g., training, years of practice), practice type, practice location, and/or caseload is associated with MMT guideline adherence. Methods: Secondary analysis of methadone practice assessment data collected by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Canada. Assessment data from methadone prescribing physicians who completed their first year of methadone practice were analyzed. We calculated the mean percentage compliance per guideline per physician and global compliance across all guidelines per physician. Linear regression was used to assess factors associated with compliance. Results: Data from 149 physician practices and 1,326 patient charts were analyzed. Compliance across all charts was greater than 90% for most areas of care. Compliance was less than 90% for take-home medication procedures; urine toxicology screening; screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis, other sexually transmitted infections, and completion of a psychosocial assessment. Mean global compliance across all charts and guidelines per physician was 94.3% (standard deviation = 7.4%) with a range of 70% to 100%. Linear regression analysis revealed that only year of medical school graduation was a significant predictor of physician compliance. Discussion: This is the first report of MMT peer assessments in Canada. Compliance is high. Few countries conduct similar assessment processes; none report physician-level results. We cannot quantify the contribution of peer assessment, training, or self-selection to the compliance rates, but compared to other areas of practice these rates suggest that peer assessment may exert a significant effect on compliance. A similar assessment process may in other areas of clinical practice improve physician compliance. [source]

Epidemiology and burden of cardiovascular disease

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S3 2004
Laurence O. Watkins M.D., M.P.H.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. The rate of CHD and CHD death varies across racial groups, with higher rates among black men and women than among white men and women. The development of CHD is promoted by major CHD risk factors,dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking. These risk factors are independently associated with CHD risk and are common among adults in the United States. Diabetes mellitus is also a significant contributor to CHD risk and is associated with risk of a CHD event equivalent to that conferred by the presence of prior CHD. Metabolic syndrome, a related condition, also confers a high risk for CHD as well as for the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes and metabolic syndrome are characterized by the presence of central obesity and insulin resistance, which result in dyslipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular derangements that promote CHD. Diabetes and metabolic syndrome illustrate the significance of risk factor clustering, which contributes to CHD risk through the additive effect of each risk factor. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and risk factor clustering in general are becoming more prevalent, which illustrates the need for better CHD prevention strategies aimed at risk factor control. The pathologic process associated with risk factor clustering also contributes to the higher CHD burden among black men and women, who have a higher prevalence of risk factor clustering and type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, despite having a higher CHD risk, black men and women are less likely to receive adequate treatment or control of risk factors, including dyslipidemia or hypertension. Eliminating disparities among population groups will thus require aggressive efforts focused on risk assessment, guideline adherence, and risk factor control in populations in need. [source]