Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Growth Monitoring (growth + monitoring)
Selected AbstractsGaining fluid bed process understanding by in-line particle size analysisJOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, Issue 3 2009Tero Närvänen Abstract Different process phenomena and process failure modes could be monitored using the in-line particle size data measured by spatial filtering technique (SFT). In addition to the real-time granule growth monitoring, other events, such as the blocking of filter bags and the distributor plate, could be observed. SFT was used off-line, at-line and in-line in 14 differently manufactured granulation batches. No significant fouling occurred during the manufacturing due to the appropriate positioning of the probe. The off-line SFT results correlated well (R2,=,0.97) with the sieve analysis results. It was also found that size segregation influenced both the in-line and at-line particle size results during the fluidization: in-line method underestimated and at-line method overestimated the final particle size. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 98:1110,1117, 2009 [source] Weight monitoring of breastfed babies in the United Kingdom , interpreting, explaining and interveningMATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION, Issue 1 2006MA (Cantab), Magda Sachs BA Abstract Weighing infants in their first 6 months is an important aspect of growth monitoring and a common activity of child health care services worldwide. During the same 6 months, support for establishing breastfeeding and the promotion of continued exclusive breastfeeding are important activities of health professionals. Parents and health professionals may perceive conflicts between achieving both robust growth and continuing breastfeeding. In this narrative review, the literature on weighing breastfed babies in the United Kingdom is examined. A companion paper examined issues of growth charts, scales and weighing frequency and accuracy. This paper considers issues of interpretation of the plotted weight values for individual breastfed babies, noting the complexities of growth patterns, which may lead to difficulties of accurate identification of those individuals whose growth merits further investigation. Little attention has been given to issues of explaining the interpreted growth curves to parents and this issue is explored and noted as of importance for further study. Research evidence on choosing appropriate interventions to improve the growth of breastfed babies is reviewed. The paucity of such evidence leads to suggestions for future study. This review gathers together a wide range of literature from many different perspectives, with the hope of informing weight monitoring practice so that this can both identify infants whose weight may be of concern, and who may need appropriate intervention, and support continued breastfeeding. [source] Weight monitoring of breastfed babies in the UK , centile charts, scales and weighing frequencyMATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION, Issue 2 2005Magda Sachs ba, ma (cantab) Abstract Weighing infants during their first 6 months is an important focus of growth monitoring and a common activity of child health care services worldwide. In these same months, health workers provide support for breastfeeding and promote continued exclusive breastfeeding. The literature on the practice of weighing breastfed babies is reviewed, as it applies to the United Kingdom. The shape of the growth curves for breastfed babies differs from that of formula-fed infants and also from centile charts previously in use. The World Health Organization commitment to the production of a new growth reference has generated discussion of the implications of charts in use. The country-specific charts in use in the UK are examined and the data used to construct them discussed with reference to clinical use for breastfed infants. Recent UK discussions on charts, as well as on the frequency of routine weighing for babies in the community are considered, and the available evidence on the accuracy of weighing in practice is noted. The choices made in constructing different charts; the physical condition of scales and their use in practice have implications for plotted growth. This paper aims to present a wide range of evidence available in this area in order to encourage debate on practice. A companion paper will discuss issues of interpretation, conveying information to parents, and interventions. [source] Swedish population-based longitudinal reference values from birth to 18 years of age for height, weight and head circumferenceACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 7 2002K Albertsson Wikland This study aimed to update growth reference values for height, weight and head circumference in order to reflect the changes in body size in the Swedish population during the past two decades. The data came from a large longitudinal growth study on 3650 full-term healthy Swedish children who were born between 1973 and 1975. All of these 1801 girls and 1849 boys had longitudinal data for height and weight from birth to final height. Comparison with previous Swedish growth reference values based on children born between 1955 and 1958 revealed that there have been secular changes in body size. For instance, at 18 y of age, the updated height and weight reference values are 180.4 cm for males and 167.7 cm for females, i.e. 1.9 cm taller and 5.7 kg heavier for males and 2.3 cm taller and 3.4kg heavier for females compared with the previous reference values. Conclusion: These new growth reference values provide current national standards for growth monitoring and evaluation since the year 2000. [source] | ||||||||||