Home  About us  Contact
 

Gross Cystic Disease Fluid (gross + cystic_disease_fluid)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Diagnostic utility of mammaglobin and GCDFP-15 in the identification of metastatic breast carcinoma in fluid specimens

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 7 2009
Z. Yan M.D.
Abstract Morphologic differentiation of breast carcinoma from nonmammary malignancies in fluid specimens can be a diagnostic challenge. Immunocytochemistry is often employed in the differential diagnosis. In this study, we evaluated the expression of mammoglobin (MGB1) in body-cavity fluid specimens and compared its efficacy as a marker for metastatic breast carcinomas with that of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15). Cell blocks from 40 fluid specimens were immunostained with monoclonal antibodies against MGB1 and GCDFP-15. They included 15 breast carcinomas and 25 nonmammary carcinomas (10 lungs, 10 ovaries, 3 gastrointestinal tracts, 1 kidney, and 1 urinary bladder). Positivity was defined as the presence of cytoplasmic staining in 10% or more carcinoma cells. Thirteen (87%) and seven (47%) breast carcinomas showed positive staining with MGB1 and GCDFP-15, respectively. Three (12%) nonmammary carcinomas (2 ovarian and 1 colonic) showed positive MGB1 staining; one (3%) nonmammary carcinoma demonstrated positive GCDFP-15 staining. The differences of MGB1 and GCDFP-15 staining between breast and nonmammary carcinomas were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Both MGB1 and GCDFP-15 are specific markers for metastatic breast carcinomas in cell block fluid specimens (88 vs. 96%). However, MGB1 is more sensitive than GCDFP-15 as a marker for metastatic breast carcinoma (87 vs. 46%). Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Immunohistochemical localization of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, -24 and -44 in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: relationship to the degree of differentiation

HISTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 2 2001
A A Selim
Immunohistochemical localization of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, -24 and -44 in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: relationship to the degree of differentiation Aims:,Three major proteins present in breast gross cystic disease fluid and expressed by the cyst lining apocrine epithelium are gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), apolipoprotein-D (APO-D; GCDFP-24) and zinc ,2-glycoprotein (ZnGP; GCDFP-44). The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of these proteins in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast and to relate their expression with the degree of differentiation of DCIS. Methods and results:,An immunohistochemical study of these proteins was performed in 57 cases of DCIS and nine cases of morphologically apocrine DCIS. Positivity was seen in 24/57 (42.1%) cases with anti-GCDFP-15, 20/57 (35.1%) cases with anti-GCDFP-24 and 22/57 (38.6%) cases with anti-GCDFP-44. GCDFP-15 positivity was noted in 5/13 (38.5%) of the well-differentiated, 11/19 (57.9%) intermediately differentiated and 8/25 (32.0%) of the poorly differentiated cases (P=0.217). GCDFP-24 positivity was seen in 3/13 (23.0%) well-differentiated, 9/19 (47.4%) intermediately differentiated and 8/25 (32.0%) poorly differentiated cases (P=0.336). GCDFP-44 was detected in 5/13 (38.5%) of well-differentiated cases, 11/19 (57.9%) intermediately differentiated and 6/25 (24.0%) poorly differentiated cases (P=0.074). In the nine cases of apocrine DCIS, GCDFP-15 positivity was detected in seven (77.8%), while five (55.6%) and six (66.7%) cases were positive for GCDFP-24 and GCDFP-44, respectively. Conclusions:,The results indicate that there is no significant association between the expression of the studied proteins and the degree of differentiation of DCIS of the breast. Moreover, some morphologically apocrine DCIS cases appear to lose expression of these proteins. [source]

Metastasis of lobular breast carcinoma to the cervix

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 4 2007
Dragan Peri
Abstract Breast cancers without previous dissemination occasionally result in hematogenous metastases in gynecologic organs, particularly in the cervix. This case report examines a multimodally treated lobular breast cancer patient who was 52 months later diagnosed with malignancy in the uterus. After a tumor was detected at the endocervical and isthmic part of the uterus, a complete hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was carried out. The malignant cells were highly positive for carcino-embrional antigen and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, sensitive breast cancer markers. In conclusion, as breast carcinoma can metastasize to atypical places (cervix, endometrium, etc.), regular surveillance of patients should include gynecologic control. [source]

Aggressive invasive micropapillary salivary duct carcinoma of the parotid gland

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 5 2008
Hidetaka Yamamoto
The presence of invasive micropapillary component has been reported to be associated with salivary duct carcinoma and poor outcomes. Herein is described a rare case of invasive micropapillary salivary duct carcinoma of the parotid gland in a 60-year-old man. The micropapillary component was approximately 70% of the area of the tumor. Squamous differentiation was focally seen adjacent to the micropapillary component. On immunohistochemistry the ordinary salivary duct carcinoma component was positive for gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), androgen receptor (AR), and HER2/neu, whereas both micropapillary and squamous components were negative for GCDFP-15 and AR. Immunohistochemical staining for D2-40 highlighted the lymph vessel invasion of tumor cells. This patient developed metastases in the lymph nodes of the neck, and also in the liver, lung, and brain. The lymph nodes and liver metastases had both ordinary salivary duct carcinoma and micropapillary components. The patient died of tumor 11 months after the initial surgical operation. The results support that the presence of micropapillary component is associated with more aggressive behavior of salivary duct carcinoma. It is also important for pathologists to recognize that GCDFP-15 and AR expression can be reduced in micropapillary carcinoma in the differential diagnosis of metastatic tumor. [source]