Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Better Renal Function (good + renal_function)
Selected AbstractsBetter renal function with enhanced immunosuppression and protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation in childrenPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2005Paula Seikku Abstract:, Subclinical rejection may be associated with decreased graft function after renal transplantation (Tx). Detection by protocol biopsies and treatment could thus be important for the long-term prognosis. We have earlier discovered that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declined in young children during the first 18 months. Consequently, we slightly enhanced and individualized each patient's immunosuppression. This was a retrospective study of 59 pediatric renal Tx patients between 1995 and 2001. The 35 historical controls received triple-therapy of azathioprine, methylprednisolone and cyclosporine. GFR was measured by protocol at discharge, 6 and 18 months, and a core biopsy was obtained at 18 months. The 24 study patients in addition received basiliximab, had GFR measured at 3 and 12 months, and a biopsy taken at 3 months. Based on histology and function, immunosuppression was individually adjusted. The groups were compared for GFR and histology at 18 months after Tx. There were less acute rejection episodes in the study group (0.38 vs. 1.23 per patient) and serum creatinine concentrations were lower. Subclinical rejection was detected and treated in 39% at 3 months. There were more chronic changes in the control (47%) than in the study group (29%) at 18 months. GFR was significantly higher in the study group at 18 months (87 vs. 68 mL/min/1.73 m2), most remarkably in patients ,2 yr of age (99 vs. 68 mL/min/1.73 m2). Detection of subclinical rejection and slightly enhanced and individualized immunosuppression improved GFR 18 months after renal Tx, especially in the youngest patients. [source] Long-term graft function with tacrolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplantation: Paired kidney analysisNEPHROLOGY, Issue 8 2009CHI YUEN CHEUNG SUMMARY: Aim: The first prospective, randomized trial with paired kidney analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. This paper reports the long-term follow-up results of the authors' previously published study, with the main focus on graft survival and renal function. Methods: Chinese patients transplanted in our centre between June 1998 and June 2005 with their first deceased renal transplant were included. Patients were included if both kidneys were received by the authors' centre, thus allowing a paired analysis. Patients were randomized to receive triple immunosuppressive therapy with either tacrolimus or Neoral cyclosporine, concomitantly with prednisolone and azathioprine therapy. Results: Seventy-six patients received cadaveric kidneys from 38 donors. Each pair of kidneys was randomly assigned to a separate group (38 subjects/group). The mean follow-up duration was 6.1 ± 1.8 years. The mean calculated creatinine clearance was significantly higher in patients receiving tacrolimus-based therapy. The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in the tacrolimus group (18.4% vs 42.1%, P = 0.03). The patient and graft survival were comparable in both treatment arms. Significantly fewer patients on tacrolimus-based therapy developed hypercholesterolaemia (P = 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus, hypertension, opportunistic infection and malignancy between both groups. Conclusion: Using the immunosuppressive regimen, tacrolimus-based therapy provided adequate immunosuppression with better renal function and less acute rejection, as compared with cyclosporine-based therapy. [source] A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT Study)AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010A. Durrbach Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT-EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial,EXTended criteria donors) is a 3-year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4,7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine-treated patients. [source] BK-Virus and the Impact of Pre-Emptive Immunosuppression Reduction: 5-Year ResultsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2010K. L. Hardinger A 1-year, single-center, randomized trial demonstrated that the calcineurin inhibitor or adjuvant immunosuppression, independently, does not affect BK-viruria or viremia and that monitoring and pre-emptive withdrawal of immunosuppression was associated with resolution of BK-viremia and absence of clinical BK-nephropathy without acute rejection or graft loss. A retrospective 5-year review of this trial was conducted. In cases of BK viremia, the antimetabolite was withdrawn and for sustained viremia, the calcineurin inhibitor was minimized. Five-year follow-up was available on 97% of patients. Overall 5-year patient survival was 91% and graft survival was 84%. There were no differences in patient-survival by immunosuppressive regimen or presence of BK-viremia. Immunosuppression and viremia did not influence graft survival. Acute rejection occurred in 12% by 5-years after transplant, was less common with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine (9% vs. 18%; p = 0.082), and was lowest with the tacrolimus-azathioprine regimen (5%, p = 0.127). Tacrolimus was associated with better renal function at 5-years (eGFR 63 FK vs. 52 CsA mL/min, p = 0.001). Minimization of immunosuppression upon detection of BK-viremia was associated with excellent graft survival at 5-years, low rejection rates and excellent renal function. It is a safe, short and long-term strategy that resulted in freedom from clinically evident BK-virus nephropathy. [source] Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization in the Symphony Study: Observational Results 3 Years after TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009H. Ekberg The Symphony study showed that at 1 year posttransplant, a regimen based on daclizumab induction, 2 g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), low-dose tacrolimus and steroids resulted in better renal function and lower acute rejection and graft loss rates compared with three other regimens: two with low-doses of cyclosporine or sirolimus instead of tacrolimus and one with no induction and standard cyclosporine dosage. This is an observational follow-up for 2 additional years with the same endpoints as the core study. Overall, 958 patients participated in the follow-up. During the study, many patients changed their immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. switched from sirolimus to tacrolimus), but the vast majority (95%) remained on MMF. During the follow-up, renal function remained stable (mean change: ,0.6 ml/min), and rates of death, graft loss and acute rejection were low (all about 1% per year). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm continued to have the highest GFR (68.6 ± 23.8 ml/min vs. 65.9 ± 26.2 ml/min in the standard-dose cyclosporine, 64.0 ± 23.1 ml/min in the low-dose cyclosporine and 65.3 ± 26.2 ml/min in the low-dose sirolimus arm), but the difference with the other arms was not significant (p = 0.17 in an overall test and 0.077, 0.039 and 0.11, respectively, in pair-wise tests). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm also had the highest graft survival rate, but with reduced differences between groups over time, and the least acute rejection rate. In the Symphony study, the largest ever prospective study in de novo kidney transplantation, over 3 years, daclizumab induction, MMF, steroids and low-dose tacrolimus proved highly efficacious, without the negative effects on renal function commonly reported for standard CNI regimens. [source] Aminoglycoside dosing in diabetesJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2000Axworthy Studies have evaluated the comparative efficacy, toxicity and costs associated with extended-interval vs. standard multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides. In this case, an elderly man with diabetes and good renal function at baseline was switched from standard to extended-interval dosing. During the course of therapy there was evidence of decreased renal function. Pertinent literature was searched for, uncovered and critically evaluated to determine if and what evidence supports using extended dosing of aminoglycosides in this population. No data were found specifically evaluating the different dosing strategies in diabetic patients. However, there were many trials and several meta-analysis located that compared the two dosing strategies, most suggesting at least a cost advantage and possibly less toxicity with extended-interval dosing. Further information is needed to determine whether there is a differential risk for toxicity between these dosing regimens in patient with diabetes. [source] Delayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The ,ReSpECT' StudyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009J. M. Neuberger We report a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial investigating the effect of lower levels and delayed introduction of tacrolimus on renal function in liver transplant recipients. Adult patients with good renal function undergoing primary liver transplant were randomized to either: group A (standard-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels >10 ng/mL] and corticosteroids; n = 183); group B (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] 2g/day, reduced-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels ,8 ng/mL], and corticosteroids; n = 170); group C (daclizumab induction, MMF, reduced-dose tacrolimus delayed until the fifth day posttransplant and corticosteroids, n = 172). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 52 weeks. The eGFR decreased by 23.61, 21.22 and 13.63 mL/min in groups A, B and C, respectively (A vs C, p = 0.012; A vs B, p = 0.199). Renal dialysis was required less frequently in group C versus group A (4.2% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.037). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 27.6%, 29.2% and 19.0%, respectively. Patient and graft survival was similar. In conclusion, daclizumab induction, MMF, corticosteroids and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus was associated with less nephrotoxicity than therapy with standard-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids without compromising efficacy or tolerability. [source] | ||||||||||