Home About us Contact | |||
Global Risk (global + risk)
Selected AbstractsGlobal Risk, Investment and EmotionsECONOMICA, Issue 307 2010RONALD BOSMAN We investigate a novel dynamic choice problem in an experiment where emotions are measured through self-reports. The choice problem concerns the investment of an amount of money in a safe option and a risky option when there is a ,global risk' of losing all earnings, from both options, including any return from the risky option. Our key finding is that global risk can reduce the amount invested in the risky option. This result cannot be explained by Expected Utility or by its main contenders, Rank-Dependent Utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory. An explanation is offered by taking account of emotions, using the emotion data from the experiment and recent psychological findings. [source] Shifting Paradigms in Defining and Treating Hypertension: Addressing Global Risk With Combination TherapyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, Issue 2008Jan Basile MD Guest Editor No abstract is available for this article. [source] Global Risk, Women, Men: What's the Score?PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, Issue 2 2008Ezra A. Amsterdam MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Appendix 1: Vitamin A Deficiency: A Global RiskCOMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, Issue 1 2008Article first published online: 30 JAN 200 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Global Risk, Investment and EmotionsECONOMICA, Issue 307 2010RONALD BOSMAN We investigate a novel dynamic choice problem in an experiment where emotions are measured through self-reports. The choice problem concerns the investment of an amount of money in a safe option and a risky option when there is a ,global risk' of losing all earnings, from both options, including any return from the risky option. Our key finding is that global risk can reduce the amount invested in the risky option. This result cannot be explained by Expected Utility or by its main contenders, Rank-Dependent Utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory. An explanation is offered by taking account of emotions, using the emotion data from the experiment and recent psychological findings. [source] Incidence, Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences of Neutropenia Following Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective StudyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2009L. Zafrani Neutropenic episodes in kidney transplant patients are poorly characterized. In this retrospective study, neutropenia was experienced by 112/395 patients (28%) during the first year posttransplant. The only factor found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of neutropenia was combined tacrolimus-mycophenolate therapy (p < 0.001). Neutropenic patients experienced more bacterial infections (43% vs. 32%, p = 0.04). Grade of neutropenia correlated with the global risk of infection. Discontinuation of mycophenolic acid (MPA) due to neutropenia was associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection (odds ratios per day 1.11, 95% confidence intervals 1.02,1.22) but not with reduced renal function at 1 year. The time from onset of neutropenia to MPA discontinuation correlated with the duration of neutropenia. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was safe and effective in severely neutropenic kidney graft recipients, with absolute neutrophil count >1000/,L achieved in a mean of 1.5±0.5 days. Neutropenia is an important and frequent laboratory finding that may exert a significant influence on outcomes in kidney transplantation. As well as leading to an increased incidence of infection, it is associated with a higher rate of allograft rejection if MPA is discontinued for >6 days (p = 0.02). G-CSF accelerates recovery of neutropenia and may be a good therapeutic alternative for severely neutropenic patients. [source] Assessing coronary heart disease risk with traditional and novel risk factorsCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S3 2004Peter W. F. Wilson M.D. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the industrialized world, and a number of well-characterized factors, including advanced age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and smoking, contribute to cardiovascular risk. Integration of these factors using the Framingham calculation estimates the absolute 10-year risk for coronary heart disease (CHD), which can be used to guide therapy. Recent studies have demonstrated that additional markers, including elevated lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, sitosterol, and particularly C-reactive protein (CRP), are also associated with increased risk for CHD. In particular, high-sensitivity CRP has been shown to identify patients with high CHD risk who may not have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and may add to the predictive value of the Framing-ham functions for CHD risk assessment. Assessment of global risk is particularly important in lipid management, as the LDL-C target goals are determined by risk category. [source] Global Risk, Investment and EmotionsECONOMICA, Issue 307 2010RONALD BOSMAN We investigate a novel dynamic choice problem in an experiment where emotions are measured through self-reports. The choice problem concerns the investment of an amount of money in a safe option and a risky option when there is a ,global risk' of losing all earnings, from both options, including any return from the risky option. Our key finding is that global risk can reduce the amount invested in the risky option. This result cannot be explained by Expected Utility or by its main contenders, Rank-Dependent Utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory. An explanation is offered by taking account of emotions, using the emotion data from the experiment and recent psychological findings. [source] |