Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Generic Substitution (generic + substitution)
Selected AbstractsGeneric substitution,issues relating to the Australian experiencePHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 6 2001FRCGP, Hugh McGavock BSc No abstract is available for this article. [source] Quantifying Components of Drug Expenditure Inflation: The British Columbia Seniors' Drug Benefit PlanHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, Issue 5 2002Steven G Morgan Objective. To quantify the relative and absolute importance of different factors contributing to increases in per capita prescription drug costs for a population of Canadian seniors. Data Sources/Study Setting. Data consist of every prescription claim from 1985 to 1999 for the British Columbia Pharmacare Plan A, a tax-financed public drug plan covering all community-dwelling British Columbians aged 65 and older. Study Design. Changes in per capita prescription drug expenditures are attributed to changes to four components of expenditure inflation: (1) the pattern of exposure to drugs across therapeutic categories; (2) the mix of drugs used within therapeutic categories; (3) the rate of generic drug product selection; and (4) the prices of unchanged products. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Data were extracted from administrative claims files housed at the UBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research. Principal Findings. Changes in drug prices, the pattern of exposure to drugs across therapeutic categories, and the mix of drugs used within therapeutic categories all caused spending per capita to increase. Incentives for generic substitution and therapeutic reference pricing policies temporarily slowed the cost-increasing influence of changes in product selection by encouraging the use of generic drug products and/or cost-effective brand-name products within therapeutic categories. Conclusions. The results suggest that drug plans (and patients) would benefit from more concerted efforts to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of competing products within therapeutic categories of drugs. [source] Changing GPs' prescription patterns through guidelines and feedback.PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 6 2007Intervention study Abstract Purpose To investigate whether and how a multi-dimensional intervention including clinical guidelines on the choice of medical treatment in the primary and the secondary health care sector, and individual feedback to general practices about their own and other practices' prescription patterns in five Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system (ATC)-groups was followed by changes in the practices' prescription pattern. Methods Prospective historical registry study and a questionnaire study of GPs' self-reported use of guidelines and feedback. Results In every ATC-group the number of prescribed defined daily doses (DDDs) kept growing after the intervention, while potential savings by DDD decreased. Individual practices' changes in the prescription pattern differed by ATC-group and practices with high potential savings/DDD before the intervention showed the greatest relative reduction in potential savings/DDD. The county's average cost/DDD for the five ATC-groups declined from above the Danish average before the intervention to a level below the average cost/DDD after the intervention. In the questionnaire study (response rate: 79%), 69% of respondents had read the guidelines and 78% reported that the feedback influenced their prescription of drugs. Conclusions The observed changes in drug costs and potential savings were not due to volume effects but a combination of price effects, including generic substitution and choice of less expensive analogues, demonstrating that it is possible to change GPs' prescription patterns without interfering with patients' access to treatment or with GPs' clinical freedom.' Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Impact of the Minimum Pricing Policy and introduction of brand (generic) substitution into the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in AustraliaPHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 4 2001Peter McManus Abstract Purpose To describe the effects of introducing the Minimum Pricing Policy (MPP) and generic (brand) substitution in 1990 and 1994 respectively on the dispensing of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions both at the aggregate and individual patient level. Methods The relative proportion of prescriptions with a brand premium and those at benchmark was examined 4 years after introduction of the MPP and again 5 years later after generic substitution by pharmacists was permitted. To determine the impact of a price signal at the individual level, case studies involving a patient tracking methodology were conducted on two drugs (fluoxetine and ranitidine) that received a brand premium. Results From a zero base when the MPP was introduced in 1990, there were 5.4 million prescriptions (17%) dispensed for benchmark products 4 years later in 1994. At this stage generic (brand) substitution by pharmacists was then permitted and the market share of benchmark brands increased to 45% (25.2 million) by 1999. In the patient tracking studies, a significantly lower proportion of patients was still taking the premium brand of fluoxetine 3 months after the introduction of a price signal compared with patients taking paroxetine which did not have a generic competitor. This was also the case for the premium brand of ranitidine when compared to famotidine. The size of the price signal also had a marked effect on dispensing behaviour with the drug with the larger premium (fluoxetine) showing a significantly greater switch away from the premium brand to the benchmark product. Conclusions The introduction in 1990 of the Minimum Pricing Policy without allowing generic substitution had a relatively small impact on the selection of medicines within the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. However the effect of generic substitution at the pharmacist level, which was introduced in December 1994, resulted in a marked increase in the percentage of eligible PBS items dispensed at benchmark. Case studies showed a larger premium resulted in a greater shift of patients from drugs with a brand premium to the benchmark alternative. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Switching statins in Norway after new reimbursement policy , a nationwide prescription studyBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 4 2007Solveig Sakshaug What is already known about this subject ,,Use of statins is growing worldwide and costs represent a burden to public budgets. ,,The introduction of simvastatin generics, generic substitution and price regulations have contributed to price reductions and resulted in overall cost reductions of statin use in Norway. What this study adds ,,New reimbursement regulations for statins in Norway in June 2005, making simvastatin the drug of choice, had a great impact on physicians' prescribing of statins. ,,Nearly 40% of the atorvastatin users switched to simvastatin during the 13-month period after implementation of the new regulations. ,,Among the new users of statins the proportion receiving simvastatin increased from 48% in May 2005 to 92% in June 2006. ,,The new regulations have reduced costs of statins, even though the prevalence of statin use has increased. Aims To assess the changes in prescribing of statins in Norway after implementation of the new reimbursement regulations for statins in June 2005. Methods Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database covering the total population in Norway (4.6 million). Outcome measures were the proportion of atorvastatin users switching to simvastatin and changes in the proportion of new statin users receiving simvastatin. Based on retail costs for all statin prescriptions dispensed in Norway, expenditure was measured in Norwegian currency. Results One-year prevalences of statin use increased from 6.3 to 6.8% for women and from 7.5 to 8.1% for men from the year before to the year after the new statin regulations. Of atorvastatin users (N = 131 222), 39% switched to simvastatin during the 13-month period after the implementation. The proportion of switching was higher in women (41%) than in men (36%). In May 2005, 48% of the new statin users received simvastatin. The proportion of new users receiving simvastatin increased rapidly after implementation of the new regulations to 68% in June 2005 and reached 92% in June 2006. Expenditure was reduced from ,120 million to ,95 million when comparing the year before with the year after the new statin regulations. Conclusions The new reimbursement policy for statins has had a great impact on physicians' prescribing of statins in Norway. Physicians in Norway acknowledge the importance of contributing to cost containment. [source] | ||||||||||