Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Genomic Copy Number (genomic + copy_number)
Selected AbstractsGenomic imbalances in rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines affect expression of genes frequently altered in primary tumors: An approach to identify candidate genes involved in tumor developmentGENES, CHROMOSOMES AND CANCER, Issue 6 2009Edoardo Missiaglia Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) are the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. They resemble developing skeletal muscle and are histologically divided into two main subtypes; alveolar and embryonal RMS. Characteristic genomic aberrations, including the PAX3 - and PAX7-FOXO1 fusion genes in alveolar cases, have led to increased understanding of their molecular biology. Here, we determined the effect of genomic copy number on gene expression levels through array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of 13 RMS cell lines, confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification copy number analyses, combined with their corresponding expression profiles. Genes altered at the transcriptional level by genomic imbalances were identified and the effect on expression was proportional to the level of genomic imbalance. Extrapolating to a public expression profiling dataset for 132 primary RMS identified features common to the cell lines and primary samples and associations with subtypes and fusion gene status. Genes identified such as CDK4 and MYCN are known to be amplified, overexpressed, and involved in RMS tumorigenesis. Of the many genes identified, those with likely functional relevance included CENPF, DTL, MYC, EYA2, and FGFR1. Copy number and expression of FGFR1 was validated in additional primary material and found amplified in 6 out of 196 cases and overexpressed relative to skeletal muscle and myoblasts, with significantly higher expression levels in the embryonal compared with alveolar subtypes. This illustrates the ability to identify genes of potential significance in tumor development through combining genomic and transcriptomic profiles from representative cell lines with publicly available expression profiling data from primary tumors. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Determination of genomic copy number with quantitative microsphere hybridization,,HUMAN MUTATION, Issue 4 2006Heather L. Newkirk Abstract We developed a novel quantitative microsphere suspension hybridization (QMH) assay for determination of genomic copy number by flow cytometry. Single copy (sc) products ranging in length from 62 to 2,304 nucleotides [Rogan et al., 2001; Knoll and Rogan, 2004] from ABL1 (chromosome 9q34), TEKT3 (17p12), PMP22 (17p12), and HOXB1 (17q21) were conjugated to spectrally distinct polystyrene microspheres. These conjugated probes were used in multiplex hybridization to detect homologous target sequences in biotinylated genomic DNA extracted from fixed cell pellets obtained for cytogenetic studies. Hybridized targets were bound to phycoerythrin-labeled streptavidin; then the spectral emissions of both target and conjugated microsphere were codetected by flow cytometry. Prior amplification of locus-specific target DNA was not required because sc probes provide adequate specificity and sensitivity for accurate copy number determination. Copy number differences were distinguishable by comparing the mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of test probes with a biallelic reference probe in genomic DNA of patient samples and abnormal cell lines. Concerted 5, ABL1 deletions in patient samples with a chromosome 9;22 translocation and chronic myelogenous leukemia were confirmed by comparison of the mean fluorescence intensities of ABL1 test probes with a HOXB1 reference probe. The relative intensities of the ABL1 probes were reduced to 0.59±0.02 &!ndash;fold in three different deletion patients and increased 1.42±0.01 &!ndash;fold in three trisomic 9 cell lines. TEKT3 and PMP22 probes detected proportionate copy number increases in five patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 1a disease and chromosome 17p12 duplications. Thus, the assay is capable of distinguishing one allele and three alleles from a biallelic reference sequence, regardless of chromosomal context. Hum Mutat 27(4), 376,386, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Simultaneously detection of genomic and expression alterations in prostate cancer using cDNA microarray,THE PROSTATE, Issue 14 2008Mei Jiang Abstract BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a common disease among men but the knowledge of the prostate carcinogenesis is still limited. METHODS cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and expression profiling were performed to screen the genomic and the expression changes in prostate cancer respectively. The two data were integrated to study the influence of genomic aberrations on gene expression and seek for the genes with their expression affected by the genomic aberrations. Real-time PCR was performed to evaluate the array data. RESULTS Array-based CGH detected gains at 2q, 3p/q, 5q, 6q, 8q, 9p, 10p/q, 11q, 12p, 14q, and 19p/q and losses at 1p, 2p, 4q, 6p/q, 7p, 11p/q, 12q, 17p/q, 19p/q, and Xp/q in more than 20% prostate tumors and narrowed these aberrations. For example, the gain of 8q was mapped to five minimal regions. Novel aberrations were also identified, such as loss at Xq21.33-q22.2. Expression profiling discovered the significant biological processes involved in the prostate carcinogenesis, such as exogenous antigen presentation via MHC class II and protein ubiquitination. Integration analysis revealed a weak positive correlation between genomic copy number and gene expression level. Fifty-three genes showed their expression directly affected by the genomic aberrations possibly, including more than one member of Ras superfamily and major histocompatibility complex (MHC). These genes are involved in multiple biological processes. CONCLUSIONS Integration of the CGH and expression data provided more information than separate analysis. Although the direct influence of genomic aberrations on gene expression seems weak, the influence can be extended by indirect regulation through a few directly affected genes. Because the influence can be persistent, the genes directly affected by the genomic aberrations may play key roles in the prostate carcinogenesis and are worth further analysis. Prostate 68: 1496,1509, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||