			Home About us Contact

Geographic Range Size (geographic + range_size)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

The significance of geographic range size for spatial diversity patterns in Neotropical palms

ECOGRAPHY, Issue 1 2006
Holger Kreft
We examined the effect of range size in commonly applied macroecological analyses using continental distribution data for all 550 Neotropical palm species (Arecaceae) at varying grain sizes from 0.5° to 5°. First, we evaluated the relative contribution of range-restricted and widespread species on the patterns of species richness and endemism. Second, we analysed the impact of range size on the predictive value of commonly used predictor variables. Species sequences were produced arranging species according to their range size in ascending, descending, and random order. Correlations between the cumulative species richness patterns of these sequences and environmental predictors were performed in order to analyse the effect of range size. Despite the high proportion of rare species, patterns of species richness were found to be dominated by a minority of widespread species (,20%) which contained 80% of the spatial information. Climatic factors related to energy and water availability and productivity accounted for much of the spatial variation of species richness of widespread species. In contrast, species richness of range-restricted species was to a larger extent determined by topographical complexity. However, this effect was much more difficult to detect due to a dominant influence of widespread species. Although the strength of different environmental predictors changed with spatial scale, the general patterns and trends proved to be relatively stabile at the examined grain sizes. Our results highlight the difficulties to approximate causal explanations for the occurrence of a majority of species and to distinguish between contemporary climatic factors and history. [source]

The sizes of species' geographic ranges

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2009
Kevin J. Gaston
Summary 1Geographic range size and how it changes through time is one of the fundamental ecological and evolutionary characteristics of a species, and a strong predictor of extinction risk. However, the measurement of range size remains a substantial challenge. Indeed, there is significant confusion in the literature as to how this should be done, particularly in the context of the distinction between the fundamentally different concepts of extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO), and the use of these quantities, including in assessments of the threat status of species. 2Here we review the different approaches to determining the geographic distributions of species, the measurement of their range sizes, the relationships between the two, and other difficulties posed by range size measurement (especially those of range discontinuities when measuring EOO, and spatial scale when measuring AOO). 3We argue that it is important to (i) distinguish the estimation of the distribution of a species from the measurement of its geographic range size; (ii) treat measures of EOO and AOO as serving different purposes, rather than regarding them as more or less accurate ways of measuring range size; and (iii) measure EOO including discontinuities in habitat or occupancy. 4Synthesis and applications. With the availability and collation of extensive data sets on species occurrences, a rapidly increasing number of studies are investigating geographic range size, and particularly how various measures of range size predict macroecological patterns and inform assessments of the conservation status of species and areas. The distinction between EOO and AOO is becoming blurred in many contexts, but most particularly in that of threatened species assessments for Red Listing. Continued progress in these fields demands greater clarity in the meaning and derivation of measures of geographic range size. The two principal measures serve different purposes, and should not be regarded as alternatives that simply differ in accuracy. [source]

Range expansion of the globally Vulnerable Karamoja apalis Apalis karamojae in the Serengeti ecosystem

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2010
Philip Shaw
Abstract The underlying causes of change in geographic range size are less well understood in African birds than in north temperate species. Here, we examine factors associated with range expansion in the Karamoja apalis (Apalis karamojae), a globally Vulnerable warbler confined to north-east Uganda, north-central Tanzania and southern Kenya. In Tanzania, it was originally known only from the Wembere Steppe, but since 1993 (and possibly as early as 1983) has extended its range into the Serengeti ecosystem, c. 140 km to the north, reaching southern Kenya by 2004. Changes in the warbler's range within the Serengeti have broadly reflected a cyclical change in the density of its main habitat, Acacia drepanolobium woodland, which was low in the 1970s, high during the 1980s and 1990s, and declined in the early 2000s. Karamoja apalis records in the Serengeti showed a 5 year time lag behind A. drepanolobium density, which was in turn negatively correlated with the area of grassland burnt 10 years earlier. Previous studies in the Serengeti have also linked Acacia regeneration to changes in grazing pressure, as increasing wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) numbers have reduced the volume of combustible material present, and hence the frequency of damaging ,hot burns'. We conclude that this globally threatened warbler appears to have benefited from changes in ungulate populations in the Serengeti, which have influenced burning intensity and hence tree regeneration. The warbler's range now appears to be declining, however, following a recent reduction in the density and annual survival of A. drepanolobium in the northern Serengeti. Résumé Les causes sous-jacentes du changement de la taille d'une distribution géographique sont moins bien connues pour les oiseaux africains que pour les espèces du nord tempéré. Nous examinons ici des facteurs liés à l'expansion de l'aire de répartition de l'apalis de Karamoja Apalis karamojae, un sylviidé classé comme Vulnérable au niveau mondial, confiné au NE de l'Ouganda, au centre-nord de la Tanzanie et au sud du Kenya. En Tanzanie, on ne le connaissait à l'origine que dans la steppe de Wembere mais depuis 1993, et peut-être même dès 1983, il a étendu son aire de répartition dans l'écosystème du Serengeti, environ 140 km plus au nord, et atteint le sud du Kenya en 2004. Les changements de l'aire de répartition de ce sylviidé dans le Serengeti reflètent largement un changement cyclique de la densité de son habitat principal, la forêt d'Acacia drepanolobium, qui était faible dans les années 1970, forte pendant les années 1980 et 1990, et qui a diminué au début des années 2000. Les rapports sur l'apalis de Karamoja au Serengeti montrent un retard de cinq ans par rapport à l'évolution de la densité d'A. drepanolobium, elle-même étant négativement liée à la zone de prairie brûlée 10 ans plus tôt. Des études antérieures faites au Serengeti lient aussi la régénération des acacias aux changements de la pression du pâturage, étant donné que le nombre croissant de gnous, Connochaetes taurinus, a réduit le volume des matières combustibles restantes et donc la fréquence des feux trop chauds qui causent beaucoup de dégâts. Nous concluons que cet oiseau menacé au niveau mondial semble avoir bénéficié des changements des populations d'ongulés au Serengeti, qui ont influencé l'intensité des feux et donc la régénération des arbres. L'aire de répartition de ce sylviidé semble pourtant en train de se réduire suite à une récente réduction de la densité et de la survie annuelle d'A. drepanolobium dans le nord du Serengeti. [source]

Phylogenetic autocorrelation and heritability of geographic range size, shape and position of fiddler crabs, genus Uca (Crustacea, Decapoda)

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH, Issue 2 2010
J. C. Nabout
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of phylogenetic heritability of the geographical range size, shape and position for 88 species of fiddler crabs of the world, using phylogenetic comparative methods and simulation procedures to evaluate their fit to the neutral model of Brownian motion. The geographical range maps were compiled from literature, and range size was based on the entire length of coastline occupied by each species, and the position of each range was calculated as its latitudinal and longitudinal midpoint. The range shape of each species was based in fractal dimension (box-counting technique). The evolutionary patterns in the geographical range metrics were explored by phylogenetic correlograms using Moran's I autocorrelation coefficients, autoregressive method (ARM) and phylogenetic eigenvector regression (PVR). The correlograms were compared with those obtained by simulations of Brownian motion processes across phylogenies. The distribution of geographical range size of fiddler crabs is right-skewed and weak phylogenetic autocorrelation was observed. On the other hand, there was a strong phylogenetic pattern in the position of the range (mainly along longitudinal axis). Indeed, the ARM and PVR evidenced, respectively, that ca. 86% and 91% of the longitudinal midpoint could be explained by phylogenetic relationships among the species. The strong longitudinal phylogenetic pattern may be due to vicariant allopatric speciation and geographically structured cladogenesis in the group. The traits analysed (geographical range size and position) did not follow a Brownian motion process, thus suggesting that both adaptive ecological and evolutionary processes must be invoked to explain their dynamics, not following a simple neutral inheritance in the fiddler-crab evolution. Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo fue estimar los niveles de herencia filogenética existentes en la posición geográfica, forma y el tamaño de rango geográfico en 88 especies de cangrejo violinista del mundo, mediante simulaciones y métodos comparativos filogenéticos para así evaluar su ajuste al modelo neutro de evolución browniana. Los mapas de rango geográfico se obtuvieron de la literatura. La forma de rango geográfico fue estimada en la dimensión fractal. Los patrones evolutivos en el tamaño y forma del rango geográfico y la posición geográfica fueron explorados mediante correlogramas filogenéticos utilizando el índice I de Moran, coeficientes autorregresivos (ARM) y regressión por autovetores filogenéticos (PVR). Estos correlogramas fueron comparados con aquellos obtenidos mediante la simulación de procesos de evolución browniana en las filogenias. El tamaño y forma de rango geográfico del cangrejo violinista mostró una distribución apuntada hacia la derecha aunque no se encontró autocorrelación filogenética. Por otra parte, se observó un marcado patrón filogenético para la posición geográfica del rango (principalmente a lo largo del eje longitudinal). De hecho, el ARM y PVR evidenció respectivamente que cerca del 86% y 91% de la localización del punto medio longitudinal del rango se puede explicar mediante las relaciones filogenéticas existentes entre las especies. El fuerte patrón filogenético en la longitud podría ser debido a especiación alopátrica y a una cladogénesis estructurada geográficamente para el grupo, tal y como se propuso en las hipótesis. Los rasgos analizados (rango geográfico y posición geográfica) no siguieron un proceso de evolución browniana, sugiriendo pues que tanto los procesos evolutivos como la adaptación ecológica deberían ser tenidos en cuenta para explicar sus dinámicas, ya que el transcurso de la evolución del cangrejo violinista no se explica mediante un simple modelo de herencia neutra. [source]

Host specificity and geographic range in haematophagous ectoparasites

OIKOS, Issue 3 2005
Boris R. Krasnov
A negative interspecific correlation between the degree of habitat specialization and the size of a species' geographic range has been documented for several free living groups of organisms, providing support for the niche breadth hypothesis. In contrast, practically nothing is known about the geographic range sizes of parasitic organisms and their determinants. In the context of the niche breadth hypothesis, parasites represent ideal study systems, because of the well documented variation in host specificity among parasite species. Here, we investigated the relationship between host specificity (a measure of niche breadth) and geographic range size among flea species parasitic on small mammals, using data from seven distinct geographical regions. Two measures of host specificity were used: the number of host species used by a flea species, and a measure of the average taxonomic distance between the host species used by a flea; the latter index provides an evolutionary perspective on host specificity. After correcting for phylogenetic influences, and using either of our two measures of host specificity, the degree of host specificity of fleas was negatively correlated with the size of their geographic range in all seven regions studied here, with only one minor exception. Overall, these results provide strong support for the niche breadth hypothesis, although other explanations cannot be ruled out. [source]

The geographic structure of morphological variation in eight species of fiddler crabs (Ocypodidae: genus Uca) from the eastern United States and Mexico

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, Issue 1 2010
MELANIE J. HOPKINS
Species with larger geographic distributions are more likely to encounter a greater variety of environmental conditions and barriers to gene flow than geographically-restricted species. Thus, even closely-related species with similar life-history strategies might vary in degree and geographic structure of variation if they differ in geographic range size. In the present study, we investigated this using samples collected across the geographic ranges of eight species of fiddler crabs (Crustacea: Uca) from the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America. Morphological variation in the carapace was assessed using geometric morphometric analysis of 945 specimens. Although the eight Uca species exhibit different degrees of intraspecific variation, widespread species do not necessarily exhibit more intraspecific or geographic variation in carapace morphology. Instead, species with more intraspecific variation show stronger morphological divergence among populations. This morphological divergence is partly a result of allometric growth coupled with differences in maximum body size among populations. On average, 10% of total within-species variation is attributable to allometry. Possible drivers of the remaining morphological differences among populations include gene flow mediated by ocean currents and plastic responses to various environmental stimuli, with isolation-by-distance playing a less important role. The results obtained indicate that morphological divergence among populations can occur over shorter distances than expected based on dispersal potential. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 100, 248,270. [source]