Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Gemcitabine Therapy (gemcitabine + therapy)
Selected AbstractsGemcitabine induced digital ischaemia and necrosisEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, Issue 3 2010A. HOLSTEIN md HOLSTEIN A., BÄTGE R. & EGBERTS E.-H. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care19, 408,409 Gemcitabine induced digital ischaemia and necrosis A 70-year-old woman presented with a 7-day history of severe pain, paresthesia, oedema, acrocyanosis and punctate haemorrhagic lesions on her fingertips. The complaints began 2 days after the second cycle of a first-line chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin or carboplatin, and gemcitabine due to advanced urothelial carcinoma. At the fingertips of both hands, haemorrhagic and partly ulcerative lesions were found; these were attributed to vascular toxicity of gemcitabine. Therapeutically sympathicolysis by bilateral blockade of the brachial plexus was performed, accompanied by intravenous administration of the prostacyclin analog iloprost, fractionated heparin subcutaneously and oral therapy with corticosteroids and aspirin. Digital amputation could be avoided. Acral ischemia is a rare but probably underreported adverse effect of gemcitabine therapy and a potential source of misdiagnosis. [source] Establishment of six new human biliary tract carcinoma cell lines and identification of MAGEH1 as a candidate biomarker for predicting the efficacy of gemcitabine treatmentCANCER SCIENCE, Issue 4 2010Hidenori Ojima The aim of this study was to establish new biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) cell lines and identify predictive biomarkers for the potential effectiveness of gemcitabine therapy. Surgical specimens of BTC were transplanted directly into immunodeficient mice to establish xenografts, then subjected to in vitro cell culture. The gemcitabine sensitivity of each cell line was determined and compared with the genome-wide gene expression profile. A new predictive biomarker candidate was validated using an additional cohort of gemcitabine-treated BTC cases. From 55 BTC cases, we established 19 xenografts and six new cell lines. Based on their gemcitabine sensitivity, 10 BTC cell lines (including six new and four publicly available ones) were clearly categorized into two groups, and MAGEH1 mRNA expression in the tumor cells showed a significant negative correlation with their sensitivity to gemcitabine. Immunohistochemically, MAGEH1 protein was detected in three (50%) out of six sensitive cell lines, and four (100%) out of four resistant cell lines. In the validation cohort of gemcitabine-treated recurrence cases, patients were categorized into "effective" and "non-effective" groups according to the RECIST guidelines for assessment of chemotherapeutic effects. MAGEH1 protein expression was detected in two (40%) out of five "effective" cases and all four (100%) "non-effective" cases. We have established a new BTC bioresource that covers a wide range of biological features, including drug sensitivity, and is linked with clinical information. Negative expression of MAGEH1 protein serves as a potential predictive marker for the effectiveness of gemcitabine therapy in BTC. (Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 882,888) [source] Determinants of sensitivity and resistance to gemcitabine: The roles of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and deoxycytidine kinase in non-small cell lung cancerCANCER SCIENCE, Issue 9 2004Hiroyuki Achiwa Gemcitabine is one of the most commonly used agents for lung cancer chemotherapy, but the determinants of sensitivity and/or resistance to this agent are not yet fully understood. In this study we used quantitative RT-PCR to examine the expression levels of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) and deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) genes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines in relation to sensitivity and resistance to gemcitabine. The basal expression levels of hENT1 were significantly correlated with the IC50 values for gemcitabine (r=-0.6769, P=0.0005), whereas dCK expression levels were not. In a highly gemcitabine-sensitive cell line, NCI-H23, the sensitivity to gemcitabine was inhibited by nitrobenzylmercaptopurine ribonucleoside (NBMPR), an inhibitor of hENT1, without significant modulation of hENT1 expression. These data suggest that hENT1 is associated with gemcitabine sensitivity in lung cancer. We also continuously exposed NCI-H23 cells to gemcitabine and subsequently established the drug-resistant clone H23/GEM-R, which showed a significant decrease of dCK expression; however, hENT1 expression was not altered in the continuously exposed sublines or in the resistant clone. We conclude that increased hENT1 expression is a determinant of gemcitabine sensitivity, while decreased dCK expression is associated with acquired resistance to gemcitabine in NSCLC cells. Thus, hENT1 and dCK might be useful as predictive markers for efficacy of gemcitabine therapy in NSCLC. [source] Cutaneous vasculitis associated with gemcitabine therapyCLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2009F. Corella No abstract is available for this article. [source] | ||||||||||