Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Gemcitabine
Terms modified by Gemcitabine Selected AbstractsGemcitabine induced digital ischaemia and necrosisEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, Issue 3 2010A. HOLSTEIN md HOLSTEIN A., BÄTGE R. & EGBERTS E.-H. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care19, 408,409 Gemcitabine induced digital ischaemia and necrosis A 70-year-old woman presented with a 7-day history of severe pain, paresthesia, oedema, acrocyanosis and punctate haemorrhagic lesions on her fingertips. The complaints began 2 days after the second cycle of a first-line chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin or carboplatin, and gemcitabine due to advanced urothelial carcinoma. At the fingertips of both hands, haemorrhagic and partly ulcerative lesions were found; these were attributed to vascular toxicity of gemcitabine. Therapeutically sympathicolysis by bilateral blockade of the brachial plexus was performed, accompanied by intravenous administration of the prostacyclin analog iloprost, fractionated heparin subcutaneously and oral therapy with corticosteroids and aspirin. Digital amputation could be avoided. Acral ischemia is a rare but probably underreported adverse effect of gemcitabine therapy and a potential source of misdiagnosis. [source] Gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicityFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Fabrice Barlési Abstract Gemcitabine is a relatively new deoxycytidine analog (2,,2,-difluorodeoxycytidine) with structural similarities to cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). Activity of gemcitabine is demonstrated in the treatment of many solid tumors, like pancreas, ovarian and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although gemcitabine is considered as a drug with a good safety profile, cases of gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicity (GISPT) were reported as for Ara-C. We performed a systematic review of reported cases on the GISPT. Twenty-nine clinical trials especially interesting NSCLC patients (21) and 21 reported cases recording 40 patients were analyzed. The incidence of the GISPT varies from 0 to 5%. The clinical presentation is a subacute clinical syndrome and is frequently nonspecific. The predominant radiographic pattern on chest X-ray are reticulo-nodular interstitial infiltrates. It was postulated that the physio-pathological mechanism of the GISPT was an inflammatory reaction of the alveolar capillary wall cytokine-mediated, which created an abnormal permeability of its membrane. After the differential diagnosis were ruled out, the discontinuation of the drug and the early initiation of steroids and diuretics are the most frequently performed treatments. Under these conditions, the outcome was favorable in a delay of few days generally for a majority of patients but 20% of patients died. Some risk factors, as a previous pulmonary disease or a previous thoracic irradiation, for the occurrence of the GISPT were proposed. GISPT is rare but sometimes fatal. Its a necessity to increase awareness about it to enhanced an early and suitable management of patients developing such a toxicity after gemcitabine administration. [source] Gemcitabine for patients with relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinomaINTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, Issue 5-6 2002L. Mileshkin No abstract is available for this article. [source] Gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy in Japanese patients with immunotherapy-resistant renal cell carcinomaINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 6 2009Norihito Soga Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combined gemcitabine and capecitabine (Gca) chemotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer after immunotherapy failure. Nine patients were enrolled in this trial. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was injected on days 1 and 8, followed by oral administration of capecitabine (1660 mg/m2) on days 1,14. The response rate was 11%, with a partial response in one patient (11%), stable disease in five patients (56%) and disease progression in three patients (33%). Grade 3,4 neutropenia was observed in one patient (11%) and thrombocytopenia in two patients (22%). The quality of life (QOL) questionnaire scales showed no significant changes induced by chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival was 4 months with an overall 1-year survival rate of 78%. Gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy can be safely administered as second-line therapy in renal cell cancer patients, maintaining QOL baseline parameters. [source] bcl-2-specific siRNAs restore Gemcitabine sensitivity in human pancreatic cancer cellsJOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007Kinya Okamoto Abstract Gemcitabine has been shown to ameliorate disease related symptoms and to prolong overall survival in pancreatic cancer.Yet, resistance to Gemcitabine is commonly observed in this tumour entity and has been linked to increased expression of anti-apoptotic bcl-2. We therefore investigated if and to what extend silencing of bcl-2 by specific siRNAs (siBCL2) might enhance Gemcitabine effects in human pancreatic carcinoma cells. siBCL2 was transfected into the pancreatic cancer cell line YAP C alone and 72 hrs before co-incubation with different concentrations of Gemcitabine. Total protein and RNA were extracted for Western-blot analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Pancreatic cancer xenografts in male nude mice were treated intraperitoneally with siBCL2 alone, Gemcitabine and control siRNA or Gemcitabine and siBCL2 for 21 days. Combination of both methods lead to a synergistic induction of apoptosis at otherwise ineffective concentrations of Gemcitabine. Tumour growth suppression was also potentiated by the combined treatment with siBCL2 and Gemcitabine in vivo and lead to increased TUNEL positivity. In contrast, non-transformed human foreskin fibroblasts showed only minor responses to this treatment. Our results demonstrate that siRNA-mediated silencing of anti-apoptotic bcl-2 enhances chemotherapy sensitivity in human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and might lead to improved therapy responses in advanced stages of this disease. [source] Gemcitabine inhibits viability, growth, and metastasis of osteosarcoma cell linesJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 4 2005Takashi Ando Abstract Gemcitabine (dFdCyd) is an analog of cytosine arabinoside with anti-tumor activity in several human cancers. However, the efficacy of this compound in osteosarcoma has not been fully elucidated. Here we assessed the anti-tumor activity of gemcitabine using osteosarcome cell lines. In 9 human osteosarcoma cell lines (G292, HOS, MG63, NY, SaOS, HuO, HuO-3N1, HuO9, HuO9-N2), gemcitabine at the doses of > 100 nM showed significant cytotoxicity. In HOS and MG63 cell lines, gemcitabine inhibited DNA synthesis as determined by IdU labeling assay and induced apoptosis as determined by DNA fragmentation assay and May-Giemsa staining. In C3H mice inoculated s.c. with a murine osteosarcoma cell line, LM8, treatment of the mice with gemcitabine showed reduced size of the primary tumor associated with increased apoptotic cells and a virtual absence of metastatic lesions in the lung. Gemcitabine thus had anti-tumor activity on osteosarcoma cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. The result would provide a cellular basis for application of gemcitabine to patients with osteosarcoma. © 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. [source] Chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancerJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 8 2006FACS, Xabier de Aretxabala MD Abstract Gallbladder cancer (GC) is considered a rare disease associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, the low number of cases makes the performance of trials addressing the role of adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and/or palliative therapy difficult. For a long time, the majority of trials were 5-fluorouracil (5 FU)-based, and results were uniformly poor. Since the introduction of Gemcitabine, response rates of approximately 30% have been observed through the use of this drug and new approaches have been tested. In this sense, drugs such as Cisplatin and Capecitabine have been employed concurrently with gemcitabine and/or radiation. Since a recurrence pattern is both distant and local, chernoradiation seems a logical option to deal with the disease. However, at the present time, the lack of valid and scientific evidence means that most of the recommendations originate from trials dealing with other tumors, such as pancreas cancer and biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aforementioned treatment alternatives warrant further evaluation focusing on GC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:699,704. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Tolerability of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Doublet Therapy in Cats with CarcinomasJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 3 2009I. Martinez-Ruzafa Background: This study was performed to determine the toxicity of gemcitabine-carboplatin doublet therapy in cats with carcinomas. Hypothesis: Gemcitabine and carboplatin are safe in tumor-bearing cats. Animals: Twenty cats with spontaneously occurring carcinomas. Methods: A cohort of 6 cats received gemcitabine (2 mg/kg IV) on days 1, 8, and 15 and carboplatin (10 mg/kg IV) immediately after gemcitabine on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. A 2nd cohort of 14 cats received carboplatin 4 hours after gemcitabine on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8 but not day 15. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results: Cats in the 1st cohort received a median of 3.75 cycles per animal (range, 1,6). Two cats (33.3%) developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 1 (16.7%) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 (16.7%) grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Gemcitabine dose reductions and treatment delays occurred in 1 and 4 cats, respectively. Cats in the 2nd cohort received a median of 2 cycles per animal (range, 0.5,10). Two cats (14.3%) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 1 (7.1%) had grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. One cat required gemcitabine dose reduction and 6 had treatment delays. In the 2nd cohort, of 11 cats with measurable tumors, there was 1 complete response (pancreatic carcinoma) and 1 partial response (squamous cell carcinoma, receiving concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Gemcitabine-carboplatin combination appears moderately well tolerated in tumor-bearing cats. Minimal patient benefit suggests that alternative schedules or combinations of gemcitabine with other agents should be explored. [source] Clinical Evaluation of Gemcitabine in Dogs with Spontaneously Occurring MalignanciesJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 1 2005Carrie E. Kosarek We conducted a clinical evaluation of gemcitabine in 19 dogs with spontaneously occurring malignancies. The principal objectives of this study were to characterize toxicity and seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity of gemcitabine administered every 2 weeks (biweekly) as a 30-minute IV infusion. A total of 64 doses, ranging from 300 mg/m2 to 675 mg/m2, were administered during the initial 8-week evaluation period, and an additional 131 doses were administered during the extended evaluation period. The total cumulative dose for the 10 dogs receiving gemcitabine in the extended evaluation period ranged from 1,500 mg/m2 to 24,300 mg/m2. Clinical evidence of toxicity was minimal. Cumulative myelosuppression was not apparent. Unexplained retinal hemorrhages occurred in 1 dog. No complete or partial remissions were observed during the initial evaluation period; however, objective responses were observed in 2 dogs during the extended evaluation period. Gemcitabine is a promising new chemotherapeutic agent that can be used safely in dogs with cancer. Biweekly administration of doses of 675 mg/m2 IV results in minimal and acceptable toxicity. [source] Gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy as salvage treatment for refractory or relapsing aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, Issue 7 2009Shih-Hung Yang No abstract is available for this article. [source] Liposomal gemcitabine (GemLip),efficient drug against hormone-refractory Du145 and PC-3 prostate cancer xenograftsTHE PROSTATE, Issue 11 2009Peter Jantscheff Abstract BACKGROUND Gemcitabine (Gemc) is an efficient chemotherapeutic drug in various cancer types (e.g., pancreas) but has only limited effects on hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPCa). Since HRPCa cells are highly sensitive to even low doses of Gemc in vitro, the lack of clinical effects might be due to rapid degradation of Gemc by deaminases combined with impaired accumulation in tumor tissue and PCa cells. Liposomal formulation (GemLip) is expected to protect the entrapped cytotoxic substance from enzymatic degradation and furthermore augment its accumulation within tumor tissues due to an enhanced permeability of the tumor vessels. METHODS Anti-tumoral and anti-metastatic activity of GemLip and Gemc were investigated in two luciferase-expressing, human hormone-refractory PC-3 and Du145 HRPCa xenograft models in immunodeficient mice. Tumor growth was monitored by in vivo luminescence imaging (orthotopic) or callipering (subcutaneous). Anti-metastatic effects of treatment were determined by in vitro luciferase assay of the tissues. RESULTS Tumor growth of subcutaneous Du145 xenografts was significantly inhibited only by GemLip (8 mg/kg: P,=,0.014 and 6 mg/kg: P,=,0.011) but not by conventional Gemc (360 mg/kg). In contrast, growth of orthotopic PC-3 xenografts was significantly inhibited by both, GemLip (P,=,0.041) and Gemc (P,=,0.002). The drugs furthermore strongly reduced spleen and liver metastases in this model. CONCLUSIONS As shown by the very low efficient concentration of GemLip, liposomal entrapment of Gemc greatly enhances its activity. GemLip has, even at very low doses, a significant anti-tumoral and anti-metastatic therapeutic effect in HRPCa xenografts in vivo and was beneficial even when the conventional Gemc failed. Prostate 69:1151,1163, 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancerASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Shom GOEL Abstract Aim: Gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) have both shown activity in the treatment of anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the GD combination. Methods: Patients with measurable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had previously received anthracycline-based therapy were eligible. The patients received D 40 mg/m2 followed by G 800 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled and received a median of five cycles (range 0,8). Of these, 24 were evaluable for efficacy, with an overall response rate of 29.2% (95% CI, 12.6,51.1%). An additional 36.7% had a stable disease for an overall clinical benefit of 65.9%. The median duration of response was 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0,3.6 months) and the median time to disease progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.0,8.9 months). The median survival time was 16.7 months (95% CI, 7.3,32.0 months). Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 73.3% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 6.7%. Conclusion: Weekly G and D is an active and safe regimen in treating metastatic breast cancer. The response rate was lower than that previously reported for this combination, which may relate to the lower doses used and the weekly D schedule. It may be worthwhile to further explore this combination to determine the optimal dosing schedule. [source] A phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinomaCANCER, Issue 9 2003Barbara J. Gitlitz M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or , N1) metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract. METHODS A total of 27 patients were enrolled in the current multisite study, which was performed within the University of California-Los Angeles Community Oncology Research Network. The first 10 patients in the study received 800 mg/m2 of gemcitabine intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle. In addition, on Day 1, the first 10 patients received 80 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously after completion of the gemcitabine infusion. Because of dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia), the initial dose of docetaxel was reduced to 60 mg/m2 for the remaining patients who entered the study (n = 17 patients). RESULTS Neutropenia was the most common adverse event that occurred in patients at the Grade 3 level (in 10 of 27 patients; 37.0%) and the Grade 4 level (in 6 of 27 patients; 22.2%). There were no other adverse events at the Grade 4 toxicity level. Twenty-five of 27 patients (92.6%) completed more than 1 cycle of combination therapy and were evaluated for antitumor responses. The frequency of objective clinical responses was 33.3% (9 of 27 patients). Complete responses to therapy were observed in 2 of 27 patients (7.4%), and partial responses were observed in 7 of 27 patients (25.9%). The median duration of response was 20 weeks (range, 12+ weeks to 152 weeks). The median survival duration was 52 weeks (range, 12 weeks to 160+ weeks). Four of 27 patients (14.8%) remained alive at the time of the current data analysis. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel was an effective treatment for patients with unresectable (Stage T4 or , N1) metastatic or locally advanced TCC of the urothelial tract. Gemcitabine plus docetaxel appeared to be tolerated well, and treatment-related toxicities were limited to hematologic toxicities. Because cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, the gemcitabine plus docetaxel combination may prove to be an effective and well tolerated treatment option for these patients. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society. [source] Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for platinum-based regimensCANCER, Issue 7 2002Sergio Ricci M.D. Abstract BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus epirubicin in previously untreated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were not eligible for cisplatin-based regimens. METHODS Patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and at least one of the following characteristics were eligible: impaired renal function (creatinine clearance < 60 mL per minute), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) , 2, and age , 75 years. The treatment included epirubicin 70 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients entered the study, and a total of 152 cycles were administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1,6 cycles per patient). The following Grade 3,4 hematologic toxicities were reported (percent of cycles): neutropenia, 22.4%; anemia, 11.2%; and thrombocytopenia, 6.5%. No cardiac, renal, or hepatic toxicities were observed. Dose intensities of epirubicin and gemcitabine were 19.6 mg/m2 per week (84%) and 532.2 mg/m2 per week (80%), respectively. There were 2 complete responses (5.3%), 13 partial responses (34.2%), 11 patients with stable disease (28.9%), and 12 patients with progressive disease (31.6%), for an overall response rate of 39.5% (95% confidence interval, 25.1,55.1). The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 4.8 months and 8.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 38%, and the median PFS and OS were 6.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively, in patients with PS 0,1. Thirty patients were symptomatic: Seventeen patients (56.7%) achieved a complete response, and 5 patients (16.7%) achieved a partial symptomatic response. CONCLUSIONS At the doses given in this study, gemcitabine and epirubicin had a good tolerability profile with interesting activity in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were not fit for cisplatin-based regimens. Cancer 2002;95:1444,50. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10860 [source] Phase I clinical trial using peptide vaccine for human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in combination with gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancerCANCER SCIENCE, Issue 2 2010Motoki Miyazawa Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) is an essential factor in tumor angiogenesis and in the growth of pancreatic cancer. Immunotherapy using epitope peptide for VEGFR2 (VEGFR2-169) that we identified previously is expected to improve the clinical outcome. Therefore, a phase I clinical trial combining of VEGFR2-169 with gemcitabine was conducted for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with metastatic and unresectable pancreatic cancer were eligible for the trial. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. The VEGFR2-169 peptide was subcutaneously injected weekly in a dose-escalation manner (doses of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/body, six patients/one cohort). Safety and immunological parameters were assessed. No severe adverse effect of grade 4 or higher was observed. Of the 18 patients who completed at least one course of the treatment, 15 (83%) developed immunological reactions at the injection sites. Specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) reacting to the VEGFR2-169 peptide were induced in 11 (61%) of the 18 patients. The disease control rate was 67%, and the median overall survival time was 8.7 months. This combination therapy for pancreatic cancer patients was tolerable at all doses. Peptide-specific CTL could be induced by the VEGFR2-169 peptide vaccine at a high rate, even in combination with gemcitabine. From an immunological point of view, the optimal dose for further clinical trials might be 2 mg/body or higher. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (no. NCT 00622622). (Cancer Sci 2009) [source] Determinants of sensitivity and resistance to gemcitabine: The roles of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and deoxycytidine kinase in non-small cell lung cancerCANCER SCIENCE, Issue 9 2004Hiroyuki Achiwa Gemcitabine is one of the most commonly used agents for lung cancer chemotherapy, but the determinants of sensitivity and/or resistance to this agent are not yet fully understood. In this study we used quantitative RT-PCR to examine the expression levels of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) and deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) genes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines in relation to sensitivity and resistance to gemcitabine. The basal expression levels of hENT1 were significantly correlated with the IC50 values for gemcitabine (r=-0.6769, P=0.0005), whereas dCK expression levels were not. In a highly gemcitabine-sensitive cell line, NCI-H23, the sensitivity to gemcitabine was inhibited by nitrobenzylmercaptopurine ribonucleoside (NBMPR), an inhibitor of hENT1, without significant modulation of hENT1 expression. These data suggest that hENT1 is associated with gemcitabine sensitivity in lung cancer. We also continuously exposed NCI-H23 cells to gemcitabine and subsequently established the drug-resistant clone H23/GEM-R, which showed a significant decrease of dCK expression; however, hENT1 expression was not altered in the continuously exposed sublines or in the resistant clone. We conclude that increased hENT1 expression is a determinant of gemcitabine sensitivity, while decreased dCK expression is associated with acquired resistance to gemcitabine in NSCLC cells. Thus, hENT1 and dCK might be useful as predictive markers for efficacy of gemcitabine therapy in NSCLC. [source] Randomized phase II study of carboplatin/gemcitabine versus vinorelbine/gemcitabine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancerCANCER, Issue 3 2006West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 010 Abstract BACKGROUND. Combined gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) and combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) are active and well tolerated chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors conducted a randomized Phase II study of GC versus GV to compare them in terms of efficacy and toxicity. METHODS. One hundred twenty-eight patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to receive either carboplatin at an area under the curve of 5 on Day 1 combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 (n = 64 patients) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 (n = 64 patients) every 3 weeks. RESULTS. Response rates were 20.3% for the GC patients and 21.0% for the GV patients. In the GC arm, the median survival was 432 days, and the a 1-year survival rate was 57.6%; in the GV arm, the median survival was 385 days, and the 1-year survival rate was 53.3% in the GV arm. The median progression-free survival was 165 days in the GC arm and 137 days in the GV arm. Severe hematologic toxicity (Grade 4) was significantly more frequent in the GC arm (45.3% vs. 25.8% in the GV arm; P = .022). Most notably, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the GC arm (81.3% vs. 6.5% in the GV arm; P < .001). Conversely, severe nonhematologic toxicity (Grade 3 or 4) was more common in the GV arm (7.8% vs. 19.4% in the GC arm; P = .057). CONCLUSIONS. Although the GV and GC regimens had different toxicity profiles, there was no significant difference in survival among patients with NSCLC in the current study. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society. [source] Synthesis and in vitro cytotoxic activity on human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells of lipoamino acid conjugates of gemcitabineDRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, Issue 5 2010Rosario Pignatello Abstract Lipophilic derivatives of the antitumor drug gemcitabine (GEM) with the potential for improving drug loading in lipid-based colloidal carriers, like liposomes or lipid nanoparticles, are described. GEM free base was conjugated to lipoamino acids bearing an alkyl side chain of different length, by either a carbodiimide-assisted or an ethylchloroformiate-assisted coupling reaction, to obtain N4 -acyl GEM derivatives. These compounds retained the same in vitro cell growth inhibitory activity of the parent drug against two lines of human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells. Stability studies suggested that the observed activity was due mainly to intact derivatives and not to released GEM. Accordingly, these amphiphilic derivatives can be proposed in a further step for the encapsulation in liposomes or lipid nanocarriers, to achieve as a final goal an improvement of the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic activity of GEM. Drug Dev Res 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Gemcitabine induced digital ischaemia and necrosisEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, Issue 3 2010A. HOLSTEIN md HOLSTEIN A., BÄTGE R. & EGBERTS E.-H. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care19, 408,409 Gemcitabine induced digital ischaemia and necrosis A 70-year-old woman presented with a 7-day history of severe pain, paresthesia, oedema, acrocyanosis and punctate haemorrhagic lesions on her fingertips. The complaints began 2 days after the second cycle of a first-line chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin or carboplatin, and gemcitabine due to advanced urothelial carcinoma. At the fingertips of both hands, haemorrhagic and partly ulcerative lesions were found; these were attributed to vascular toxicity of gemcitabine. Therapeutically sympathicolysis by bilateral blockade of the brachial plexus was performed, accompanied by intravenous administration of the prostacyclin analog iloprost, fractionated heparin subcutaneously and oral therapy with corticosteroids and aspirin. Digital amputation could be avoided. Acral ischemia is a rare but probably underreported adverse effect of gemcitabine therapy and a potential source of misdiagnosis. [source] Gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicityFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Fabrice Barlési Abstract Gemcitabine is a relatively new deoxycytidine analog (2,,2,-difluorodeoxycytidine) with structural similarities to cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). Activity of gemcitabine is demonstrated in the treatment of many solid tumors, like pancreas, ovarian and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although gemcitabine is considered as a drug with a good safety profile, cases of gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicity (GISPT) were reported as for Ara-C. We performed a systematic review of reported cases on the GISPT. Twenty-nine clinical trials especially interesting NSCLC patients (21) and 21 reported cases recording 40 patients were analyzed. The incidence of the GISPT varies from 0 to 5%. The clinical presentation is a subacute clinical syndrome and is frequently nonspecific. The predominant radiographic pattern on chest X-ray are reticulo-nodular interstitial infiltrates. It was postulated that the physio-pathological mechanism of the GISPT was an inflammatory reaction of the alveolar capillary wall cytokine-mediated, which created an abnormal permeability of its membrane. After the differential diagnosis were ruled out, the discontinuation of the drug and the early initiation of steroids and diuretics are the most frequently performed treatments. Under these conditions, the outcome was favorable in a delay of few days generally for a majority of patients but 20% of patients died. Some risk factors, as a previous pulmonary disease or a previous thoracic irradiation, for the occurrence of the GISPT were proposed. GISPT is rare but sometimes fatal. Its a necessity to increase awareness about it to enhanced an early and suitable management of patients developing such a toxicity after gemcitabine administration. [source] In vivo antitumor effect of the mTOR inhibitor CCI-779 and gemcitabine in xenograft models of human pancreatic cancerINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 9 2006Daisuke Ito Abstract Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is considered to be a major effector of cell growth and proliferation that controls protein synthesis through a large number of downstream targets. We investigated the expression of the phosphatidylinositol 3,-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR signaling pathway in human pancreatic cancer cells and tissues, and the in vivo antitumor effects of the mTOR inhibitor CCI-779 with/without gemcitabine in xenograft models of human pancreatic cancer. We found that the Akt, mTOR and p70 S6 kinase (S6K1) from the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway were activated in all of the pancreatic cancer cell lines examined. When surgically resected tissue specimens of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were examined, phosphorylation of Akt, mTOR and S6K1 was detected in 50, 55 and 65% of the specimens, respectively. Although CCI-779 had no additive or synergistic antiproliferative effect when combined with gemcitabine in vitro, it showed significant antitumor activity in the AsPC-1 subcutaneous xenograft model as both a single agent and in combination with gemictabine. Furthermore, in the Suit-2 peritoneal dissemination xenograft model, the combination of these 2 drugs achieved significantly better survival when compared with CCI-779 or gemcitabine alone. These results demonstrate promising activity of the mTOR inhibitor CCI-779 against human pancreatic cancer, and suggest that the inhibition of mTOR signaling can be exploited as a potentially tumor-selective therapeutic strategy. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Anti-tumor efficacy of the nucleoside analog 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-4-thio-,-D-arabinofuranosyl) cytosine (4,-thio-FAC) in human pancreatic and ovarian tumor xenograft modelsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 6 2005Deborah A. Zajchowski Abstract 1-(2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-4-thio-,- D -arabinofuranosyl) cytosine (4,-thio-FAC) is a deoxycytidine analog that has been shown previously to have impressive anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects in vitro and in vivo toward colorectal and gastric tumors. In our present studies, the pharmacokinetic behavior in nude mice and the effectiveness of 4,-thio-FAC against human pancreatic and ovarian tumor growth were assessed in comparison with standard chemotherapeutic agents. Potent in vitro anti-proliferative effects were observed against pancreatic (Capan-1, MIA-PaCa-2, BxPC-3) and ovarian (SK-OV-3, OVCAR-3, ES-2) cancer cell lines with IC50 of 0.01,0.2 ,M. In vivo anti-tumor activity was evaluated in nude mice bearing subcutaneously (s.c.) implanted human pancreatic tumor xenografts or intraperitoneally (i.p.) disseminated human ovarian xenografted tumors. Oral daily administration of 4,-thio-FAC for 8,10 days significantly inhibited the growth of gemcitabine-resistant BxPC-3 pancreatic tumors and induced regression of gemcitabine-refractory Capan-1 tumors. 4,-Thio-FAC was also a highly effective inhibitor of ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis. In the SK-OV-3 and ES-2 ovarian cancer models, 4,-thio-FAC prolonged survival to a greater extent than that observed with gemcitabine. Furthermore, the superiority of 4,-thio-FAC to carboplatin and paclitaxel was demonstrated in the ES-2 clear cell ovarian carcinoma model. Studies provide evidence that 4,-thio-FAC is a promising new alternative to gemcitabine and other chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of a variety of tumor indications, including pancreatic and ovarian carcinoma. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Intertriginous lymphomatoid drug eruptionINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 10 2010Ronni Wolf MD A 76-year-old man developed a maculopapular purpuric eruption confined to the intertriginous areas (i.e. the inguinal, gluteal, and axillary folds). Two days before the eruption appeared, he had received a second course of chemotherapy consisting of cisplatinum 40 mg and gemcitabine (Gemzar) 1700 mg for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung stage III B. The histologic picture was of either lymphomatoid drug eruption or lymphomatoid papulosis. The antineoplastic therapy was changed to once-weekly intravenous vinorelbine (Navelbine) 50 mg, a Vinca alkaloid, and the eruption resolved completely within two weeks without any further therapy. These circumstantial evidences support the diagnosis of intertriginous drug eruption. Our case is interesting and unusual in that it demonstrated a rare clinical presentation of drug eruption, namely, intertriginous drug eruption or baboon syndrome, with a histologic picture of a lymphomatoid drug eruption that can mimic lymphoma. We are unaware of any earlier reported case of baboon syndrome with a histologic picture of lymphomatoid drug eruption. The pathomechanisms of both types of drug eruption, i.e. baboon syndrome and lymphomatoid drug eruption, are not fully understood. [source] Gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy in Japanese patients with immunotherapy-resistant renal cell carcinomaINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 6 2009Norihito Soga Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combined gemcitabine and capecitabine (Gca) chemotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer after immunotherapy failure. Nine patients were enrolled in this trial. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was injected on days 1 and 8, followed by oral administration of capecitabine (1660 mg/m2) on days 1,14. The response rate was 11%, with a partial response in one patient (11%), stable disease in five patients (56%) and disease progression in three patients (33%). Grade 3,4 neutropenia was observed in one patient (11%) and thrombocytopenia in two patients (22%). The quality of life (QOL) questionnaire scales showed no significant changes induced by chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival was 4 months with an overall 1-year survival rate of 78%. Gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy can be safely administered as second-line therapy in renal cell cancer patients, maintaining QOL baseline parameters. [source] Phase I,II trial of weekly gemcitabine plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancerJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 3 2006HER-SHYONG SHIAH Abstract Background:, Pancreatic cancer is a dismal disease. Few drugs, including gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have notable antitumor effects against advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU and the efficacy and toxicity profile of weekly gemcitabine plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods:, Patients with histo-/cytologically confirmed, advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of a 30-min infusion of gemcitabine (800 mg/m2), followed by a 24-h infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin (300 mg/m2) at day 1, day 8 and day 15 every 28 days, and was termed the GemFL24 regimen. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 1600, 2000, to 2600 mg/m2 in the phase I study, and fixed MTD for subsequent enrolled patients. Results:, Eighteen patients were enrolled in the phase I study, and 24 in phase II. The MTD of 5-FU was 2000 mg/m2, with major dose-limiting toxicities being febrile neutropenia and delayed recovery from neutropenia. The dose intensity of gemcitabine of the 35 patients with 5-FU dosage set at MTD was 593 mg/m2 per week. In the entire series of 42 patients, myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with grade 3 neutropenia in eight patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall and clinical benefit response rates were 22% and 46%, respectively; with median progression-free and overall survival of 4.1 and 6.9 months, respectively. Conclusions:, The GemFL24 regimen is a feasible and moderately active treatment with manageable toxicities for advanced pancreatic cancer, and could be a basis for further combination with other anticancer drugs. [source] Gemcitabine inhibits viability, growth, and metastasis of osteosarcoma cell linesJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 4 2005Takashi Ando Abstract Gemcitabine (dFdCyd) is an analog of cytosine arabinoside with anti-tumor activity in several human cancers. However, the efficacy of this compound in osteosarcoma has not been fully elucidated. Here we assessed the anti-tumor activity of gemcitabine using osteosarcome cell lines. In 9 human osteosarcoma cell lines (G292, HOS, MG63, NY, SaOS, HuO, HuO-3N1, HuO9, HuO9-N2), gemcitabine at the doses of > 100 nM showed significant cytotoxicity. In HOS and MG63 cell lines, gemcitabine inhibited DNA synthesis as determined by IdU labeling assay and induced apoptosis as determined by DNA fragmentation assay and May-Giemsa staining. In C3H mice inoculated s.c. with a murine osteosarcoma cell line, LM8, treatment of the mice with gemcitabine showed reduced size of the primary tumor associated with increased apoptotic cells and a virtual absence of metastatic lesions in the lung. Gemcitabine thus had anti-tumor activity on osteosarcoma cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. The result would provide a cellular basis for application of gemcitabine to patients with osteosarcoma. © 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. [source] Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a young patient population,12-year experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 1 2009A. Duffy MD Abstract Background There is a dearth of data in a younger population of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAC) regarding epidemiology, genetics, prognosis, and outcome. This report examines a large cohort of patients with PAC ,45 years of age evaluated at MSKCC over a 12-year period. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients referred to MSKCC with PAC identified from the institutional tumor registry, who were ,45 years on the date of the diagnostic biopsy, between January 1995 and February 2008, was performed. Information reviewed included demographics, clinical and pathological staging, surgical management, therapy, date of relapse, death or last follow-up. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan,Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results One hundred thirty-six cases of PAC, age ,45 years at diagnosis, were identified. Seventy-four (54%) females, 62 (46%) males. Age range: 24,45; 4, 38, and 94 patients in age groups 20,29, 30,39, 40,45 years, respectively. Fifty (37%) had a smoking history. Fourteen (10.3%) had a positive family history of PAC. Thirty-five (25.7%) underwent a curative resection for localized disease. Twenty-eight (20.1%) presented with locally advanced, inoperable disease. Sixty-eight (50%) presented as AJCC Stage IV. Twenty-three (37%) of those resected underwent adjuvant chemoradiation. Thirteen received adjuvant gemcitabine. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 12.3 months (95% CI 10.2,14.0 months). The median overall survival for the patients with locally resectable disease was 41.8 months (95% CI 20.3,47 months). The median overall survival for the patients who presented with locally advanced, unresectable disease was 15.3 months (95% CI 12,19.3 months). The median overall survival for those who presented with metastatic disease was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.2,9.5 months). Conclusions This is the largest reported cohort of young patients with PAC ,45 years of age. The data suggest that patients with stages I,II disease may have an improved prognosis, however the prognosis for stages III,IV patients appears to be similar to the typical (older) patient population with PAC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;100:8,12. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancerJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 8 2006FACS, Xabier de Aretxabala MD Abstract Gallbladder cancer (GC) is considered a rare disease associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, the low number of cases makes the performance of trials addressing the role of adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and/or palliative therapy difficult. For a long time, the majority of trials were 5-fluorouracil (5 FU)-based, and results were uniformly poor. Since the introduction of Gemcitabine, response rates of approximately 30% have been observed through the use of this drug and new approaches have been tested. In this sense, drugs such as Cisplatin and Capecitabine have been employed concurrently with gemcitabine and/or radiation. Since a recurrence pattern is both distant and local, chernoradiation seems a logical option to deal with the disease. However, at the present time, the lack of valid and scientific evidence means that most of the recommendations originate from trials dealing with other tumors, such as pancreas cancer and biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aforementioned treatment alternatives warrant further evaluation focusing on GC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:699,704. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Tolerability of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Doublet Therapy in Cats with CarcinomasJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 3 2009I. Martinez-Ruzafa Background: This study was performed to determine the toxicity of gemcitabine-carboplatin doublet therapy in cats with carcinomas. Hypothesis: Gemcitabine and carboplatin are safe in tumor-bearing cats. Animals: Twenty cats with spontaneously occurring carcinomas. Methods: A cohort of 6 cats received gemcitabine (2 mg/kg IV) on days 1, 8, and 15 and carboplatin (10 mg/kg IV) immediately after gemcitabine on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. A 2nd cohort of 14 cats received carboplatin 4 hours after gemcitabine on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8 but not day 15. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results: Cats in the 1st cohort received a median of 3.75 cycles per animal (range, 1,6). Two cats (33.3%) developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 1 (16.7%) grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 (16.7%) grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Gemcitabine dose reductions and treatment delays occurred in 1 and 4 cats, respectively. Cats in the 2nd cohort received a median of 2 cycles per animal (range, 0.5,10). Two cats (14.3%) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 1 (7.1%) had grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. One cat required gemcitabine dose reduction and 6 had treatment delays. In the 2nd cohort, of 11 cats with measurable tumors, there was 1 complete response (pancreatic carcinoma) and 1 partial response (squamous cell carcinoma, receiving concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Gemcitabine-carboplatin combination appears moderately well tolerated in tumor-bearing cats. Minimal patient benefit suggests that alternative schedules or combinations of gemcitabine with other agents should be explored. [source] Clinical Evaluation of Gemcitabine in Dogs with Spontaneously Occurring MalignanciesJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 1 2005Carrie E. Kosarek We conducted a clinical evaluation of gemcitabine in 19 dogs with spontaneously occurring malignancies. The principal objectives of this study were to characterize toxicity and seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity of gemcitabine administered every 2 weeks (biweekly) as a 30-minute IV infusion. A total of 64 doses, ranging from 300 mg/m2 to 675 mg/m2, were administered during the initial 8-week evaluation period, and an additional 131 doses were administered during the extended evaluation period. The total cumulative dose for the 10 dogs receiving gemcitabine in the extended evaluation period ranged from 1,500 mg/m2 to 24,300 mg/m2. Clinical evidence of toxicity was minimal. Cumulative myelosuppression was not apparent. Unexplained retinal hemorrhages occurred in 1 dog. No complete or partial remissions were observed during the initial evaluation period; however, objective responses were observed in 2 dogs during the extended evaluation period. Gemcitabine is a promising new chemotherapeutic agent that can be used safely in dogs with cancer. Biweekly administration of doses of 675 mg/m2 IV results in minimal and acceptable toxicity. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||