Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Gastroesophageal Varices (gastroesophageal + varices)
Selected AbstractsPlatelet count is not a predictor of the presence or development of gastroesophageal varices in cirrhosis,HEPATOLOGY, Issue 1 2008Amir A. Qamar Current guidelines recommend esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with cirrhosis to screen for gastroesophageal varices (GEV). Thrombocytopenia has been proposed as a noninvasive test to predict the presence of GEV. There is no agreement regarding a specific platelet count (PLT) that can reliably predict GEV. The present longitudinal study aims to (1) further investigate the relationship between varices and PLT at the time of endoscopy, (2) investigate whether changes in PLT from the baseline over time can predict the development of GEV, and (3) investigate whether changes in PLT correlate with the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). A secondary analysis was conducted for 213 subjects with compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension but without GEV enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of a nonselective beta-blocker used to prevent GEV. PLTs were obtained every 3 months, and HVPG measurements and EGD were done annually. The PLTs were compared between subjects who did and did not develop GEV. In a median follow-up of 54.9 months, 84 patients developed GEV. PLT was greater than 150,000 in 15% of patients at the development of GEV. A receiver operating curve did not show any PLT with high sensitivity or specificity for the presence of GEV. Subjects with clinically insignificant portal hypertension (HVPG < 10 mm Hg) whose PLT remained greater than 100,000 had a 2-fold reduction in the occurrence of GEV (P = 0.0374). A significant correlation was found between HVPG and PLT at the baseline, year 1, and year 5 (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Cross-sectional or longitudinal evaluations of PLTs are inadequate noninvasive markers for GEV. Patients with mild portal hypertension whose PLT remains greater than 100,000 have significantly less risk of GEV. Although HVPG correlates somewhat with PLT, changes in PLT cannot be used as a surrogate for HVPG changes. (HEPATOLOGY 2008;47:153,159.) [source] Propranolol plus placebo versus propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the prevention of a first variceal bleed: A double-blind RCTHEPATOLOGY, Issue 6 2003Juan Carlos García-Pagán M.D. Nonselective ,-blockers are very effective in preventing first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Treatment with isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-MN) plus propranolol achieves a greater reduction in portal pressure than propranolol alone. The present multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial evaluated whether combined drug therapy could be more effective than propranolol alone in preventing variceal bleeding. A total of 349 consecutive cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices were randomized to receive propranolol + placebo (n = 174) or propranolol + IS-MN (n = 175). There were no significant differences in the 1- and 2-year actuarial probability of variceal bleeding between the 2 groups (propranolol + placebo, 8.3% and 10.6%; propranolol + IS-MN, 5% and 12.5%). The only independent predictor of variceal bleeding was a variceal size greater than 5 mm. However, among patients with varices greater than 5 mm (n = 196), there were no significant differences in the incidence of variceal bleeding between the 2 groups. Survival was also similar. Adverse effects were significantly more frequent in the propranolol + IS-MN group due to a greater incidence of headache. There were no significant differences in the incidence of new-onset or worsening ascites or in impairment of renal function. In conclusion, propranolol effectively prevents variceal bleeding. Adding IS-MN does not further decrease the low residual risk of bleeding in patients receiving propranolol. However, the long-term use of this combination drug therapy is safe and may be an alternative in clinical conditions associated with a greater risk of bleeding. [source] Low doses of isosorbide mononitrate attenuate the postprandial increase in portal pressure in patients with cirrhosisHEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2003Lia Bellis Postprandial hyperemia is associated with a significant increase in portal pressure in cirrhosis, which may contribute to progressive dilation and rupture of gastroesophageal varices. In cirrhosis, an insufficient hepatic production of nitric oxide (NO) may impair the expected hepatic vasodilatory response to increased blood flow, further exaggerating the postprandial increase in portal pressure. This study was aimed at investigating whether low doses of an oral NO donor might counteract the postprandial peak in portal pressure. Twenty-three portal hypertensive cirrhotics, 8 of them under propranolol therapy, were randomized to receive orally 5-isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN; 10 mg; n = 11) or placebo (n = 12) and a standard liquid meal 15 minutes later. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and hepatic blood flow (HBF) were measured at baseline and 15, 30, and 45 minutes after a meal. ISMN significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in portal pressure as compared with placebo (peak HVPG increase: 2.4 ± 1.4 mm Hg vs. 5.2 ± 2.1 mm Hg, P = .002). Percentual increases in HBF were similar in both groups. MAP decreased slightly in ISMN group (,7.5% ± .5%; P < .01 vs. baseline). These effects were also observed in patients on chronic propranolol therapy. In conclusion, hepatic NO supplementation by low doses of ISMN effectively reduces the postprandial increase of portal pressure in cirrhosis, with only a mild effect on arterial pressure. The same was observed in patients receiving propranolol. Our results suggest that therapeutic strategies based on selective hepatic NO delivery may improve the treatment of portal hypertension. [source] Pathological study of idiopathic portal hypertension with an emphasis on cause of death based on records of Annuals of Pathological Autopsy Cases in JapanJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 2 2007Seiko Sawada Abstract Background and Aim:, Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is thought to be benign if bleeding gastroesophageal varices can be controlled or prevented. A recent autopsy of a woman with IPH who died of hemorrhagic intestinal infarction related to mesenteric thrombosis prompted the authors to examine the terminal antemortem features and causes of death of IPH. Methods:, Autopsy cases registered as IPH from 1986 to 1997 were surveyed in the records of the Annuals of Pathological Autopsy Cases in Japan, with permission from the Japanese Society of Pathology. The records of 65 of these cases were collected and examined pathologically. Results:, It was found that the most frequent cause of death in these cases was (i) bacterial infection (20 cases). The next three causes of death were directly or indirectly related to hepatic disease or its altered portal hemodynamics as follows: (ii) progressive hepatic failure (16 cases); (iii) massive hemorrhage from ruptured gastroesophageal varices (11 cases); and (iv) hemorrhagic intestinal infarction due to mesenteric venous thrombosis (5 cases). Although portal venous thrombosis was closely associated with (iv), (ii) and (iii) seemed not to be associated with portal venous thrombosis. In addition, intracranial hemorrhage and other heterogeneous factors were identified as the cause of death in five cases and eight cases, respectively. Conclusion:, These results suggest that progressive hepatic failure and intestinal hemorrhagic infarction should be considered in addition to rupture of gastroesophageal varices when monitoring patients with IPH. Clinicians should be also aware of severe bacterial infection and intracranial hemorrhage as a fatal complication of IPH. [source] | ||||||||||