Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Gamma Diversity (gamma + diversity)
Selected AbstractsHeterogeneity, speciation/extinction history and climate: explaining regional plant diversity patterns in the Cape Floristic RegionDIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, Issue 3 2002R. M. Cowling Abstract. This paper investigates the role of heterogeneity and speciation/extinction history in explaining variation in regional scale (c. 0.1,3000 km2) plant diversity in the Cape Floristic Region of south-western Africa, a species- and endemic-rich biogeographical region. We used species-area analysis and analysis of covariance to investigate geographical (east vs. west) and topographic (lowland vs. montane) patterns of diversity. We used community diversity as a surrogate for biological heterogeneity, and the diversity of naturally rare species in quarter degree squares as an indicator of differences in speciation/extinction histories across the study region. We then used standard statistical methods to analyse geographical and topographic patterns of these two measures. There was a clear geographical diversity pattern (richer in the west), while a topographic pattern (richer in mountains) was evident only in the west. The geographical boundary coincided with a transition from the reliable winter-rainfall zone (west) to the less reliable non-seasonal rainfall zone (east). Community diversity, or biological heterogeneity, showed no significant variation in relation to geography and topography. Diversity patterns of rare species mirrored the diversity pattern for all species. We hypothesize that regional diversity patterns are the product of different speciation and extinction histories, leading to different steady-state diversities. Greater Pleistocene climatic stability in the west would have resulted in higher rates of speciation and lower rates of extinction than in the east, where for the most, Pleistocene climates would not have favoured Cape lineages. A more parsimonious hypothesis is that the more predictable seasonal rainfall of the west would have favoured non-sprouting plants and that this, in turn, resulted in higher speciation and lower extinction rates. Both hypotheses are consistent with the higher incidence of rare species in the west, and higher levels of beta and gamma diversity there, associated with the turnover of species along environmental and geographical gradients, respectively. These rare species do not contribute to community patterns; hence, biological heterogeneity is uniform across the region. The weak topography pattern of diversity in the west arises from higher speciation rates and lower extinction rates in the topographically complex mountains, rather than from the influence of environmental heterogeneity on diversity. [source] A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry.ECOGRAPHY, Issue 1 2010Part 1. The term beta diversity has been used to refer to a wide variety of phenomena. Although all of these encompass some kind of compositional heterogeneity between places, many are not related to each other in any predictable way. The present two-part review aims to put the different phenomena that have been called a beta component of diversity into a common conceptual framework, and to explain what each of them measures. In this first part, the focus is on defining beta diversity. This involves deciding what diversity is and how the observed total or gamma diversity (,) is partitioned into alpha (,) and beta (,) components. Several different definitions of "beta diversity" that result from these decisions have been used in the ecological literature. True beta diversity is obtained when the total effective number of species in a dataset (true gamma diversity,) is multiplicatively partitioned into the effective number of species per compositionally distinct virtual sampling unit (true alpha diversity,d) and the effective number of such compositional units (,Md=,/,d). All true diversities quantify the effective number of types of entities. Because the other variants of "beta diversity" that have been used by ecologists quantify other phenomena, an alternative nomenclature is proposed here for the seven most popular beta components: regional-to-local diversity ratio, two-way diversity ratio, absolute effective species turnover (=regional diversity excess), Whittaker's effective species turnover, proportional effective species turnover, regional entropy excess and regional variance excess. In the second part of the review, the focus will be on how to quantify these phenomena in practice. This involves deciding how the sampling units that contribute to total diversity are selected, and whether the entity that is quantified is all of "beta diversity", a specific part of "beta diversity", the rate of change in "beta diversity" in relation to a given external factor, or something else. [source] Spatial patterns of benthic diversity: is there a latitudinal gradient along the Norwegian continental shelf?JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2002Karie. Summary 1We examined data on soft-sediment macrobenthos (organisms retained on a 1-mm sieve) from a transect of c. 1960 km along the Norwegian continental shelf (56,71°N), covering a range of water depths (65,434 m) and varying sediment properties. 2A total of 809 species was recorded from 101 sites. Of these, 36% were restricted to one or two sites, and 29% were represented by one or two individuals. No species spanned the entire transect. Polychaetes were the dominant taxonomic group, followed by crustaceans, molluscs and echinoderms. 3Alpha diversity (sample species richness) was highly variable (35,148 species) but showed no evidence of a relationship to latitude or other environmental variables. 4Beta diversity was measured as Whittaker's ,W, the number of shared species, complementarity (biotic distinctness) and Bray,Curtis similarity, and there was no evidence of a latitudinal trend on the shelf. Beta diversity increased with the level of environmental variability, and was highest in the southern-central area, followed by the most northern area. Change in environmental variables had a stronger effect on beta diversity than spatial distance between sites. 5Gamma diversity was computed by pooling samples over large areas. There was no convincing evidence of a latitudinal cline in gamma diversity, but gamma diversity increased with the level of environmental heterogeneity. Mean alpha diversity and gamma diversity were not significantly correlated. Whereas mean complementarity and mean Bray,Curtis similarity were related to gamma diversity, ,W was not. [source] Response of Dung Beetle Diversity to Human,induced Changes in a Tropical Landscape,BIOTROPICA, Issue 1 2002Gonzalo Halffter ABSTRACT This paper examines dung beetle communities in remnant patches of tropical deciduous forest at Veracruz, Mexico, as a case study of the effects of tropical deforestation on biodiversity. The two study areas have a common biogeographic history and similar macroclimatic conditions and have been modified by human activities to different extents. The main difference between them is that cattle, which provide the dung beetle's food supply, are present in only one of the areas. Comparison of the dung beetle faunas sheds light on the relative importance of forest cover versus food supply as the principal factor determining the structure and diversity of the fauna. This comparison, which we broaden through an examination of data from other localities in central Veracruz, permits us to speculate about what happens to biodiversity when a tropical deciduous forest undergoes modification of varying type and intensity. Where tree cover has been most modified, native forest species undergo local extinction and are replaced by open area species. On the whole, there has not been a net reduction in species richness (gamma diversity) in the fragmented landscape of central Veracruz, although local species richness (alpha diversity) has diminished. RESUMES En este trabajo se presenta una aproximación de lo que ocurre con la biodiversidad estudiada a través de un grupo indicador (los escarabajos del estiércol) en dos remanentes de bosque tropical caducifolio del estado de Veracruz, México. Los dos sitios comparten la misma historia biogeografica, condiciones macroclimaticas semejantes, y ser bosques parcialmente modificados por la actividad humana. La diferencia principal está en la oferta de alimento para los Scarabaeinae, porque solamente en uno de los lugares hay ganado vacuno. La comparación de la fauna de Scara-baeinae de los dos lugares nos permite señalar que la cubierta forestal, y no la oferta de alimento, es el principal elemento conformador de la estructura y diversidad del gremio. Esta comparación, ampliada con datos de otros puntos de Veracruz centra nos permite especular lo que ocurre con la biodiversidad (representada por los Scarabaeinae) al modificarse el bosque tropical caducifolio en distintas formas e intensidades. Es relevante la sobrevivencia de las especies propias del bosque a nivel paisaje (diversidad gama), aunque puedan desaparecer en parte a escala puntual. Asi como su reemplazo por especies heliofilas en los puntos en que la vegetación arborea ha sido mas modificada. En conjunto el paisaje fragmentado y diverse de Veracruz centre no señala una pérdida de especies, aunque puntualmente (diversidad alia) si ocurra. [source] | ||||||||||