Home  About us  Contact
 

Gynaecology Clinic (gynaecology + clinic)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 8 2005
P.J. Higgs
Objective Assessment of long term outcome following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Design Retrospective follow up study using standardised examination with pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and questionnaires. Setting A tertiary urogynaecology unit in the North West of England. Population One hundred and forty consecutive cases who had a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, between 1993 and 1999. Methods Women completed questionnaires and were examined in gynaecology clinic or sent postal questionnaires if unable to attend the clinic. Main outcome measures Adequacy of vault support and recurrent vaginal prolapse assessed by POP-Q score. Assessment of prolapse, urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function using questionnaires. Results One hundred and three women were contacted after a median of 66 months. Sixty-six women were examined and a further 37 women filled in questionnaires only. Recurrent vault prolapse occurred in 4 of the 66 women who were examined. Prolapse had recurred or persisted in 21 of 66 women, with equal numbers of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Overall, 81/102 (79%) said that their symptoms of prolapse were ,cured' or ,improved'; 39/103 (38%) still had symptoms of prolapse. For every two women who were cured of their urinary or bowel symptoms, one woman developed worse symptoms. Conclusions Among the 66 women available for examination laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provided good long term support of the vault in 92%. Forty-two percent of these women had recurrent vaginal wall prolapse. Despite this, 79% of women felt that their symptoms of prolapse were cured or improved following surgery. [source]

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of women's experience of a one-stop menstrual clinic in comparison with traditional gynaecology clinics

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 9 2001
Jafaru I. Abu
Objective A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the views of patients attending two types of clinics for menstrual disorders. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire. Setting Five traditional general gynaecology clinics and a one-stop menstrual clinic, where investigations are performed and results given to patients on the same day. Participants Two hundred and thirty-nine women (126 from the gynaecology clinic and 113 from the menstrual clinic) were recruited into the quantitative study; 18 and 26 patients from the gynaecology and the menstrual clinic, respectively, were interviewed for the qualitative study. Main outcome measures Women's views about their care and progress towards resolution of their problem. Results Following the initial consultation, 106 (84%) of the gynaecology clinic, and 98 (87%) of the menstrual clinic patients completed the first part of the questionnaire. Of those, 75 (71%) and 79 (81%) patients from the two types of clinic, respectively, completed a follow up questionnaire one year later. There were statistically significant differences in all the components of the first part of the questionnaire (information, continuity, waiting, organisation, and limbo) in favour of the one-stop menstrual clinic. After one year, there was a statistically significant difference in one of the components, patient centeredness, but not in overall process co-ordination. The interviews showed that patients attending the menstrual clinic appreciated getting the results of their investigations on the same day. They also found the organisation of the one-stop menstrual clinic more closely suited to their needs and as a result were more likely to feel they were making progress. Conclusion Women were consistently more positive about their experience in the one-stop clinic. One-stop clinics organised to meet the needs of patients might be appropriate for other clinical conditions. The combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is an effective method of assessing patients' views of health services. [source]

Pregnancy testing prior to sterilisation

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 11 2000
Asha Kasliwal Specialist Registrar
Objective To determine the incidence of positive pregnancy test on the day of laparoscopic sterilisation. Design Prospective longitudinal observational study. Setting Gynaecology unit in a UK teaching hospital. Sample Between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 1998, eight hundred and two consecutive women were admitted for laparoscopic sterilisation after assessment in the gynaecology clinic. On the day of planned surgery, all women had a pregnancy test performed on a urine sample taken that morning following overnight fasting, immediately prior to operation. Main outcome measures A positive pregnancy test on the day of planned surgery. Results Of 802 women tested, 21 (2.6%) were pregnant. A careful medical history taken before surgery revealed evidence of amenorrhoea and menstrual irregularity in 17 of the pregnant women. Of the 21 pregnant women, 11 underwent termination of pregnancy, six continued the pregnancy, four had a miscarriage and one had an ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion The routine practice of pregnancy testing on the day of laparoscopic sterilisation introduced in our hospital should continue to be part of a thorough clinical assessment before surgery. This may help to reduce the considerable level of existing litigation in a high risk area of gynaecological practice. [source]

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of women's experience of a one-stop menstrual clinic in comparison with traditional gynaecology clinics

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 9 2001
Jafaru I. Abu
Objective A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the views of patients attending two types of clinics for menstrual disorders. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire. Setting Five traditional general gynaecology clinics and a one-stop menstrual clinic, where investigations are performed and results given to patients on the same day. Participants Two hundred and thirty-nine women (126 from the gynaecology clinic and 113 from the menstrual clinic) were recruited into the quantitative study; 18 and 26 patients from the gynaecology and the menstrual clinic, respectively, were interviewed for the qualitative study. Main outcome measures Women's views about their care and progress towards resolution of their problem. Results Following the initial consultation, 106 (84%) of the gynaecology clinic, and 98 (87%) of the menstrual clinic patients completed the first part of the questionnaire. Of those, 75 (71%) and 79 (81%) patients from the two types of clinic, respectively, completed a follow up questionnaire one year later. There were statistically significant differences in all the components of the first part of the questionnaire (information, continuity, waiting, organisation, and limbo) in favour of the one-stop menstrual clinic. After one year, there was a statistically significant difference in one of the components, patient centeredness, but not in overall process co-ordination. The interviews showed that patients attending the menstrual clinic appreciated getting the results of their investigations on the same day. They also found the organisation of the one-stop menstrual clinic more closely suited to their needs and as a result were more likely to feel they were making progress. Conclusion Women were consistently more positive about their experience in the one-stop clinic. One-stop clinics organised to meet the needs of patients might be appropriate for other clinical conditions. The combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is an effective method of assessing patients' views of health services. [source]

Enuresis in childhood, and urinary and fecal incontinence in adult life: do they share a common cause?

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 7 2005
Ayse Gurbuz
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether there is any association between urinary or fecal incontinence and childhood bedwetting, and given such a relationship, to detect which type of urinary incontinence (UI) is associated with childhood bedwetting. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 1021 patients who were admitted to the outpatient gynaecology clinics of the authors' institution for an annual gynaecological examination were included in this descriptive clinical study. A simple multi-choice screening questionnaire was used to collect data for analysis. RESULTS There was a history of bedwetting in childhood in 181 (21.1%) of women without and in 48 (29.6%) of those with UI; the difference was significant (chi-square, P < 0.05). Women with stress UI had significantly higher rates of enuresis in childhood (35.4%) than those without UI (21.1%; P = 0.003). Of women who had a history of bedwetting in childhood, 12.2% had stress UI, but only 6.4% of those with no such history had stress UI. Fecal incontinence was significantly more common in women with a history of bedwetting in childhood (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION A history of childhood bedwetting seems to increase the risk of having UI, stress UI and fecal incontinence. Being aware of this association may provide an opportunity to avoid exposing these women to additional risk factors for these condition. [source]