			Home About us Contact

Full Mutation (full + mutation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Closely linked cis -acting modifier of expansion of the CGG repeat in high risk FMR1 haplotypes,

HUMAN MUTATION, Issue 12 2007
S. Ennis
Abstract In its expanded form, the fragile X triplet repeat at Xq27.3 gives rise to the most common form of inherited mental retardation, fragile X syndrome. This high population frequency persists despite strong selective pressure against mutation-bearing chromosomes. Males carrying the full mutation rarely reproduce and females heterozygous for the premutation allele are at risk of premature ovarian failure. Our diagnostic facility and previous research have provided a large databank of X chromosomes that have been tested for the FRAXA allele. Using this resource, we have conducted a detailed genetic association study of the FRAXA region to determine any cis -acting factors that predispose to expansion of the CGG triplet repeat. We have genotyped SNP variants across a 650-kb tract centered on FRAXA in a sample of 877 expanded and normal X chromosomes. These chromosomes were selected to be representative of the haplotypic diversity encountered in our population. We found expansion status to be strongly associated with a ,50-kb region proximal to the fragile site. Subsequent detailed analyses of this region revealed no specific genetic determinants for the whole population. However, stratification of chromosomes by risk subgroups enabled us to identify a common SNP variant which cosegregates with the subset of D group haplotypes at highest risk of expansion (,=17.84, p=0.00002). We have verified that this SNP acts as a marker of repeat expansion in three independent samples. Hum Mutat 28(12), 1216,1224, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Preconceptional and prenatal screening for fragile X syndrome: Experience with 40 000 tests

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, Issue 11 2007
Michal Berkenstadt
Abstract Objectives To determine the carrier frequency of fragile X syndrome, and the rate of expansion from premutation (PM) carrier to full mutation (FM) fetus. Methods Results were analyzed on women with no family history of fragile X syndrome, or who were PM/FM carriers, who were tested between January 1994 and June 2004. PM was defined 55,199 repeats, FM above 200. Results Out of 40 079 women screened, 5 FM and 255 PM carriers were detected. There was no significant difference in carrier frequency between those with versus those without family history of mental retardation or developmental abnormalities: 1 in 128 (28/3596) versus 1 in 157 (232/36 483). However, the median of repeats differed significantly: 58 and 66 repeats, respectively, (P < 0.0001). Invasive prenatal diagnosis was carried out in 370 pregnancies (7 FM and 363 PM). Thirty FM fetuses were detected. There was a lower expansion rate in cases without a family history: 10% (17/169 PMs) compared to 50% (11/22 PMs) in those with a history, but this could be accounted for by the difference in allele size. Conclusion There is now sufficient information on screening parameters and prenatal diagnosis of fragile X syndrome to offer testing to women of reproductive age. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Genetic Diversity of the Fragile X Syndrome Gene (FMR1) in a Large Sub-Saharan West African Population

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, Issue 4 2010
Emmanuel K. Peprah
Summary Fragile X syndrome (OMIM #300624) is caused by the expansion of a CGG trinucleotide repeat found in the 5, untranslated region of the X-linked FMR1 gene. Although examinations of characteristics associated with repeat instability and expansion of the CGG repeat upon transmission from parent to offspring has occurred in various world populations, none has been conducted in large Sub-Saharan African populations. We have examined the FMR1 CGG repeat structure in a sample of 350 males drawn from the general population of Ghana. We found that Ghanaians and African Americans have similar allele frequency distributions of CGG repeat and its flanking STR markers, DXS548 and FRAXAC1. However, the distribution of the more complex marker, FRAXAC2, is significantly different. The haplotype structure of the FMR1 locus indicated that Ghanaians share several haplotypes with African Americans and Caucasians that are associated with the expanded full mutation. In Ghanaians, the majority of repeat structures contained two AGG interruptions, however, the majority of intermediate alleles (35,49) lacked AGG interruptions. Overall, we demonstrate that allelic diversity of the FMR1 locus among Ghanaians is comparable to African Americans, but includes a minority of CGG array structures not found in other populations. [source]

Exceptional good cognitive and phenotypic profile in a male carrying a mosaic mutation in the FMR1 gene

CLINICAL GENETICS, Issue 2 2007
LCP Govaerts
Fragile X (FRAX) syndrome is a commonly inherited form of mental retardation resulting from the lack of expression of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). It is caused by a stretch of CGG repeats within the fragile X gene, which can be unstable in length as it is transmitted from generation to generation. Once the repeat exceeds a threshold length, the FMR1 gene is methylated and no protein is produced resulting in the fragile X phenotype. The consequences of FMRP absence in the mechanisms underlying mental retardation are unknown. We have identified a male patient in a classical FRAX family without the characteristic FRAX phenotype. His intelligence quotient (IQ) is borderline normal despite the presence of a mosaic pattern of a pre-mutation (25%), full mutation (60%) and a deletion (15%) in the FMR1 gene. The cognitive performance was determined at the age of 28 by the Raven test and his IQ was 81. However, FMRP expression studies in both hair roots and lymphocytes, determined at the same time as the IQ test, were within the affected male range. The percentage of conditioned responses after delay eyeblink conditioning was much higher than the average percentage measured in FRAX studies. Moreover, this patient showed no correlation between FMRP expression and phenotype and no correlation between DNA diagnostics and phenotype. [source]