			Home About us Contact

Full Adherence (full + adherence)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	75%

Selected Abstracts

Determinants of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in Chinese HIV/AIDS patients

HIV MEDICINE, Issue 2 2003
OW Fong
Objective Drug adherence is crucial to the success of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the treatment of HIV disease. Adherence to HAART and its determinants may, however, differ across HIV/AIDS populations. Methods We retrospectively studied drug adherence by self-report in HIV-1 infected Chinese patients who have been on HAART for at least 1 year as at the end of year 2000. HAART is defined as three or more antiretrovirals with at least one protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Results The last drug adherence level assessed by self-report in 161 Chinese patients were: grade A (100%) , 130, 80.7%; grade B (95,99%) , 25, 15.5%; grade C (90,94%) , three, 1.9% and grade D (< 90%) , three, 1.9%. Patients with full adherence were more likely to have undetectable (< 500 copies/mL) plasma virus level (adjusted OR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.75,12.33). Patients' demographics, HIV disease status and antiretroviral regimen did not affect adherence. Partial drug adherence was, however, independently associated with the psychosocial factors of missing clinic appointments (adjusted OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.23,8.33), forgetfulness (adjusted OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.64,12.5) and a busy work life (adjusted OR, 6.67; 95% CI, 1.75,25). Conclusion There were similarities and differences in determinants affecting HAART adherence in Chinese compared with other patients. Psychosocial factors rather than HIV disease or treatment were more important factors in our Chinese patients. The relevance of patient populations and care setting for adherence to HAART shall be further studied. [source]

Pre-operative fasting: a nationwide survey of German anaesthesia departments

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2010
J.-P. BREUER
Background: Shorter pre-operative fasting improves clinical outcome without an increased risk. Since October 2004, German Anaesthesiology Societies have officially recommended a fast of 2 h for clear fluids and 6 h for solid food before elective surgery. We conducted a nationwide survey to evaluate the current clinical practice in Germany. Methods: Between July 2006 and January 2007, standardized questionnaires were mailed to 3751 Anaesthesiology Society members in leading positions requesting anonymous response. Results: The overall response rate was 66% (n=2418). Of those, 2148 (92%) claimed familiarity with the new guidelines. About a third (n=806, 34%) reported full adherence to the new recommendations, whereas 1043 (45%) reported an eased fasting practice. Traditional Nil per os after midnight was still recommended by 157 (7%). Commonest reasons reported for adopting the new guidelines were: ,improved pre-operative comfort' (84%), and ,increased patient satisfaction' (83%); reasons against were: ,low flexibility in operation room management' (19%), and ,increased risk of aspiration' (13%). Conclusion: Despite the apparent understanding of the benefits from reduced pre-operative fasting, full implementation of the guidelines remains poor in German anaesthesiology departments. [source]

Incomplete adherence to an adjunctive systemic antibiotic regimen decreases clinical outcomes in generalized aggressive periodontitis patients: a pilot retrospective study

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 10 2007
Adrian Guerrero
Abstract Aim: The objective of this study was to explore the effect of incomplete adherence to the prescribed antibiotic regimen, amoxicillin and metronidazole, in the non-surgical treatment of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP). Methods: This retrospective study included 18 GAP subjects who received a conventional course of full-mouth non-surgical periodontal treatment using machine-driven and hand instruments and an adjunctive course of systemic antibiotics (500 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg metronidazole three times a day for 7 days). Clinical parameters were collected at baseline and at 2 months post-treatment. Self-reported adherence to the prescribed medication regimen was recorded at 2 months. Results: All clinical parameters, except for the mean clinical attachment level (CAL) in sites with initial probing pocket depth (PPD) 3 mm, improved at 2 months in all subjects. PPD reduction was 3.7 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2, 4.3 mm] in deep pockets (7 mm) and 2.2 mm (95% CI 1.9, 2.4 mm) in moderate pockets (4,6 mm), while CAL gain was 2.2 mm (95% CI 1.7, 2.6 mm) and 1.2 mm (95% CI 0.8, 1.5 mm), respectively. However, only 11 subjects (61.1%) reported full adherence to the medication. In deep pockets (7 mm), the difference between an adherent and non-adherent/partially adherent subject was 0.9 mm (95% CI 0.1, 1.7 mm, ancova, p=0.027) in PPD reduction and 0.8 mm (95% CI ,0.2, 1.9, p=0.129) in CAL gain at 2 months. In moderate pockets (4,6 mm) this difference was smaller in magnitude: 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.1, 0.9 mm, p=0.036) in PPD reduction and 0.2 mm (95% CI ,0.3, 0.9 mm, p=0.332) in CAL gain. Conclusions: Within the limits of this design, these data suggest that incomplete adherence to a 7-day adjunctive course of systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin is associated with decreased clinical outcomes in subjects with generalized aggressive periodontitis. [source]

Calculating Sample Size for Studies with Expected All-or-None Nonadherence and Selection Bias

BIOMETRICS, Issue 2 2009
Michelle D. Shardell
Summary We develop sample size formulas for studies aiming to test mean differences between a treatment and control group when all-or-none nonadherence (noncompliance) and selection bias are expected. Recent work by Fay, Halloran, and Follmann (2007, Biometrics63, 465,474) addressed the increased variances within groups defined by treatment assignment when nonadherence occurs, compared to the scenario of full adherence, under the assumption of no selection bias. In this article, we extend the authors' approach to allow selection bias in the form of systematic differences in means and variances among latent adherence subgroups. We illustrate the approach by performing sample size calculations to plan clinical trials with and without pilot adherence data. Sample size formulas and tests for normally distributed outcomes are also developed in a Web Appendix that account for uncertainty of estimates from external or internal pilot data. [source]