Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Frequent Side-effect (frequent + side-effect)
Selected AbstractsShould levodopa dose be reduced when switched to stalevo?EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 3 2008G. Linazasoro The addition of entacapone to levodopa-carbidopa (LC) or the switch from LC to a tablet containing levodopa,carbidopa,entacapone (LCE) improves the wearing-off phenomenon, increases the ,on' time and decreases the ,off' time, but the appearance or exacerbation of dyskinesias is the more frequent side-effect. Thus, a reduction of the total levodopa dosage would be recommended. However, this could result in a lack of efficacy against the wearing-off. We report on the results of a clinical trial conducted to determine the best way in terms of efficacy, tolerability and safety of switching from LC to LCE in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end of dose wearing-off. 39 patients with PD and wearing-off without or with mild dyskinesias were randomly assigned to either a group receiving the same LC dosage or to a group in which the total LC amount was reduced by 15,25%. Four weeks after the change, both groups showed an increase in daily ,on' time and a reduction in the daily time spent in ,off'. Two patients in each group experienced an increase in basal dyskinesias. No differences in clinical assessment between groups were found. Tolerance was excellent. This study suggests that switching from LC to LCE in patients with mild-to-moderate wearing-off can be done safely with or without reducing the total LD amount, but in the clinical setting it would be more practical to keep the dosage of LC unchanged unless severe dyskinesias are present. [source] Hyperprolactinemia and amenorrhea associated with olanzapine normalized after addition of aripiprazoleJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2007J. Wolf MD Summary Hyperprolactinemia is a frequent side-effect in the use of atypical antipsychotics. The propensity to induce hyperprolactinemia is highly substance dependent and hyperprolactinemia is not always associated with clinical side-effects. We report a case in which hyperprolactinemia and amenorrhea under the treatment with olanzapine gets normalized after the addition of aripiprazole. [source] Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone under non-fasting conditions in healthy male volunteersBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue S1 2000J. J. Miceli Aims, To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single and multiple oral doses of ziprasidone in healthy male volunteers, and to determine the influence of ziprasidone on serum prolactin levels. Methods, Single and multiple doses of ziprasidone were given orally (as two divided daily doses), at fixed dosages of 10 and 40 mg day,,1, and using titrated regimens of 40,80 and 40,120 mg day,,1, for 14 days. All dosages were taken immediately after food. The study adopted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Prolactin response, sedative properties, tolerability, and extrapyramidal symptoms were also investigated. Results, Steady-state exposure to ziprasidone was attained after 1 day of dosing. Mean Cmax and AUC(0,12 h) increased with increasing dose, with apparent dose-proportionality between the 20 and 60 mg dose levels. Trough-to-peak ratios at steady state ranged from 2 to 5. Accumulation ratios for the fixed-dose regimens were 1.49 and 1.48 at the 5 and 20 mg dose levels, respectively. Ziprasidone was associated with transient prolactin elevation but levels of prolactin returned to baseline within the dosing interval at steady state. There was a marginal, transient increase in serum prolactin levels which was not dose-related at the 80 and 120 mg day,,1 doses, and which was noted to attenuate with chronic dosing. Ziprasidone was generally well tolerated. The most frequent side-effect was mild or moderate headache. A minority of patients suffered first-dose postural hypotension. Ziprasidone was also associated with a mild sedative effect that became less pronounced as treatment continued. There were no drug-related changes in electrocardiogram or clinical laboratory variables that were of clinical importance. Conclusions, Ziprasidone is characterized by a predictable pharmacokinetic profile resulting in symptoms that reflect its pharmacological action. [source] The analgesic effect of intravenous ketamine and lidocaine on pain after spinal cord injuryACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2004A. Kvarnström Background:, Pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) is a therapeutic challenge. Only a few treatments have been assessed in randomized, controlled trials. The primary objective of the present study was to examine the analgesic effect of ketamine and lidocaine in a group of patients with neuropathic pain below the level of spinal cord injury. We also wanted to assess sensory abnormalities to see if this could help us to identify responders and if treatments resulted in changes of sensibility. Methods:, Ten patients with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain below the level of injury were included. The analgesic effect of ketamine 0.4 mg kg,1 and lidocaine 2.5 mg kg,1 was investigated. Saline was used as placebo. The drugs were infused over 40 min. A randomized, double-blind, three-period, three-treatment, cross-over design was used. Systemic plasma concentrations of ketamine and lidocaine were assessed. Pain rating was performed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Sensory function was assessed with a combination of traditional sensory tests and quantitative measurement of temperature thresholds. Results:, Response to treatment, defined as 50% reduction in VAS-score during infusion, was recorded in 5/10 in the ketamine, 1/10 in the lidocaine and 0/10 in the placebo groups. Neither ketamine nor lidocaine changed temperature thresholds or assessments of mechanical; dynamic and static sensibility. Nor could these sensory assessments predict response to treatment in this setting. Lidocaine and particularly ketamine were associated with frequent side-effects. Conclusion:, Ketamine but not lidocaine showed a significant analgesic effect in patients with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. The pain relief was not associated with altered temperature thresholds or other changes of sensory function. [source] Effects of a multilamellar emulsion on glucocorticoid-induced epidermal atrophy and barrier impairmentTHE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 2 2006Sung K. AHN ABSTRACT Skin atrophy is one of the most frequent side-effects of the topical glucocorticoid. Skin barrier impairment has also been reported as a steroid-induced side effect. Although there have been various studies on preventing or minimizing this atrophogenic effect, little has been reported about preventing barrier impairment. This study was performed to determine the effects of a multilamellar emulsion (MLE) that had a well-ordered lamellar structure on the steroid-induced barrier impairment and epidermal atrophy. To confirm these effects of MLE, 0.05% clobetasol-17-propionate (CP) and 0.05% clobetasol-17-propionate in MLE (MLE/CP) were topically applied to both flanks of hairless mice for 9 days. The topically applied CP induced a significant impairment of the epidermal permeability barrier, and MLE/CP also did not have a preventive effect on this change. However, skinfold thickness studies and histological studies showed that MLE/CP significantly reduced the steroid-induced atrophy. The topical application of MLE/CP was also shown to have a preventive effect on the steroid-induced increase of the stratum corneum (SC) surface pH. In addition, the electron microscopic findings showed relatively well-conserved lamellar bilayers in the skin treated with MLE, as compared to CP only. The results showed that the topical application of MLE immediately after CP treatment prevented the glucocorticoid-induced transepidermal water loss values increase. Light microscopy measurements showed that the skin treated with MLE immediately after CP treatment for 1 week had a slightly lower decline of skin thickness than did the CP-treated skin. These results suggest that MLE should be effective for preventing glucocorticoid-induced epidermal atrophy and for repairing the barrier impairment. [source] Simultaneous radio- and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in daily clinical practice: 5 years experience in a University HospitalCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 6 2004M. Langenberg Several randomized studies and meta-analyses have shown that simultaneous radio- and chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck as compared with conventional radiotherapy. We assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of simultaneous radiotherapy (35 × 2 Gy) and chemotherapy [cisplatinum 100 mg/m2 or carboplatin (AUC 6) on days 1, 22 and 43] in daily clinical practice in a cohort of 87 patients treated at our institute between 1998 and 2002. Eighty patients completed radiotherapy according to schedule. Eighty patients received two courses of chemotherapy and 50 patients three courses. Nephrotoxity, bone marrow suppression and ototoxicity were the most frequent side-effects. Median weight loss was 8.5%. Median survival was 15 months and 44% of the patients were alive at 2 years. Patients receiving three courses of chemotherapy had a better survival than patients receiving two or less courses. Treatment with simultaneous radio- and chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer is a demanding, but feasible treatment in daily clinical practice. Survival seems to be comparable with the results achieved in patients selected for clinical trials. [source] | ||||||||||