Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Foraging Period (foraging + period)
Selected AbstractsThe ontogeny of foragwehaviour in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolorECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 2 2004Rüdiger Wehner Abstract. 1. Individually foraging desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor, exhibit short foraging lives (half lifetime, i.e. half-time of the exponential decay function: 4.5 days), in which they perform 3.7 ± 1.9 foraging runs per day. 2. During their short lifetime foraging period the ants increase the duration of their foraging round trips (up to 40.0 ± 24.6 min per run), the maximal distance of individual foraging runs (up to 28.2 ± 4.1 m), and their foraging success, i.e. the ratio of successful runs to the total number of runs (up to 0.70). 3. The parameter that increases most dramatically during a forager's lifetime is direction fidelity, i.e. the tendency to remain faithful to a particular foraging direction. 4. A model based on some simple behavioural rules is used to describe the experimental findings that within an isotropic food environment individual ants develop spatial foraging idiosyncrasies, and do so at a rate that increases with the food densities they encounter. 5. Finally, it is argued that in functional terms direction fidelity is related to the navigational benefits resulting from exploiting familiar (route-based) landmark information, and hence reduces round-trip time and by this physiological stress and predatory risk. [source] Size-related differences in diel activity of two species of juvenile eel (Anguilla) in a laboratory streamECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH, Issue 4 2000G. J. Glova Abstract , The diel activity of three size groups (small=<100 mm; medium=100,199 mm; large=200,299 mm total length) of juvenile shortfinned ("shortfin") eels (Anguilla australis) and longfinned ("longfin") eels (A. dieffenbachii) was tested in a laboratory flow tank over a 48-h period during summer. All size groups of both species were nocturnally active, with the eels hiding in the substratum during the day and coming out on top of the cobbles from dusk to dawn, to feed. During the foraging period, the numbers and activity of all sizes of longfins visible were greater than those seen of shortfins, with the differences being more pronounced for small and medium eels. The activity of all eels consisted mostly of foraging by crawling, searching and probing for prey among the cobbles. Rate of activity increased with size of eel for both species. Small eels of either species did more swimming than eels of the larger sizes, whereas large eels were observed more frequently with only their head out of the substrate than were the smaller individuals. Feeding of small eels within the interstitial spaces of the streambed may explain their significantly lower activity on top of the substrate at night. The significantly lower rate of activity recorded for shortfins than longfins of all sizes may be due partly to their ability to feed within the interstices of the stream bed, and (or) longer time to recover from handling and habituate to the test environment., [source] Comparative activity pattern during foraging of four albatross speciesIBIS, Issue 1 2002Henri Weimerskirch The activity patterns of foraging Yellow-nosed Diomedea chlororhynchos, Sooty Phoebetria fusca, Black-browed D. melanophris impavida and Grey-headed Albatross D. chrysostoma were compared using loggers recording the timing of landing and take-offs, as well as the duration of bouts in flight or on the water, and the overall time spent in flight. The four species spent a similar proportion of their foraging time in flight (56,65%). During the day they were mostly flying (77,85% of the daylight period) whereas at night they were mainly (61,71%) sitting on the water. The amount of time spent in flight during the daytime foraging period was related to the amount of time spent sitting on the water at night. Differences between species occurred in the duration of bouts in flight and on the water as well as in the frequency of landings and in the time elapsed between successive landings. Yellow-nosed Albatrosses were more active than the other species, with more frequent short bouts in flight and more frequent successive landings at short intervals. Sooty Albatrosses landed or took-off less often than the other species and were more active just before dusk. Black-browed and Grey-headed Albatrosses were more active at night, especially the first part of the night and far from the colonies. Their trips consisted of a commuting part and a foraging part. Black-browed Albatrosses landed more often during the foraging than the commuting part, suggesting that they were not searching when travelling. The study suggests that there is no fundamental difference between the overall activity budgets of the four species although they show distinctive diet, morphology and life history traits. The differences observed between the four species were related mainly to differences in foraging technique. Comparison with the Wandering Albatross, the only species for which data were available previously, suggest that this larger species might differ completely in foraging technique from the smaller albatrosses. [source] Sex differences in grey seal diet reflect seasonal variation in foraging behaviour and reproductive expenditure: evidence from quantitative fatty acid signature analysisJOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2007CARRIE A. BECK Summary 1Intraspecific variation in diet can be an important component of a species niche breadth. We tested the hypothesis that sex differences in seasonal foraging behaviour and energy storage of sexually size dimorphic grey seals Halichoerus grypus (Fabrisius 1971) are reflected in differences in the diet and niche breadth. Diet composition was estimated for 496 adult (226 males, 270 females) and 91 juvenile (46 males/45 females; all 6 months old) grey seals sampled between 1993 and 2000 using quantitative fatty acid signature analysis. Niche breadth and overlap were estimated using the Shannon,Weaver diversity index (H,) and the Morisita,Horn index (CH), respectively. 2Sand lance Ammodytes dubius (Reinhardt 1837) and redfish Sebastes sp. (Cuvier 1829) accounted for a high proportion of the diet in both sexes and age groups. However, the diets of adult males were significantly more diverse across all seasons (H,: males 0·36 ± 0·007 vs. females 0·28 ± 0·007) and less energy dense in spring (male 5·3 ± 0·07 kJ g,1 vs. females 5·6 ± 0·09 kJ g,1) than those of adult females. 3Season and sex explained most of the observed variation in adult diets, but there were significant sex,season interactions. These differences were most evident during the post-breeding (spring) foraging period when energy acquisition is important to female recovery of nutrient stores needed to support pregnancy. Females selected fewer and higher quality prey species in spring than males. 4There were no sex differences in the diets of juvenile grey seals. Although many of the species overlapped with those eaten by adults, juvenile niche breadth (H,: 0·41 ± 0·014, n = 91) was significantly broader than that of adults (H,: 0·30 ± 0·011, n = 115). Juvenile diets were also of lower energy density (5·3 ± 0·04 kJ g,1) than those of adults (5·6 ± 0·09 kJ g,1), suggesting less selectivity in these young and relatively naïve predators. 5Sex-specific seasonal changes in diet correspond to seasonal changes in diving behaviour and rate of body energy accumulation of adult males and females. Sex-specific reproductive requirements appear to be a primary factor generating the intraspecific variation in the seasonal foraging ecology of this large marine carnivore. However, sex differences in the breadth and energy content of diets also suggest the influence of body-size dimorphism as a factor shaping the diet of this species. [source] Eggload dynamics and oviposition rate in a wild population of a parasitic waspJOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 2 2000Jérôme Casas Summary 1.,This paper develops and tests in the field a model that predicts the oviposition rate and the rate of egg maturation of a synovigenic parasitic wasp during a foraging period. The parasitoid is Aphytis melinus, the highly successful biological control agent of California redscale (Aondiniella aurantii), a pest of citrus worldwide. 2.,Females were sampled in the interior canopy of grapefruit trees either just before and at the end of the foraging period over 2 days and were dissected to determine the starting and ending eggload distributions. A group of females was caught before the onset of activity and kept in vials in the field in trees with honey but without access to hosts during the foraging period. Their eggload at the end of the day was used to estimate the egg maturation rate during the foraging period. 3.,Two stochastic models are used to predict the eggload distribution at the end of the day. Both use the observed starting eggload distribution, the observed length of the foraging period and the estimated rate of egg maturation. The model providing the better fit uses an oviposition rate which is an increasing function of the eggload. 4.,The eggload does not attain a steady state distribution during a foraging period. One-third to one-half of the population is predicted to experience egg-limitation at some time during the foraging period. Five percent of the population will experience egg-limitation a second time within a single day. 5.,The common occurrence of egg-limitation over a single day and the relatively high rate of change of states between egg- and time-limitation imply that the rate of nutrient acquisition and use are likely to be subject to strong evolutionary pressures. [source] | ||||||||||