			Home About us Contact

Flat Epithelial Atypia (flat + epithelial_atypia)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	85%

Selected Abstracts

Flat Epithelial Atypia and Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Carcinoma Underestimation Rate

THE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 1 2010
Anna Ingegnoli MD
Abstract:, This study was carried out to determine the underestimation rate of carcinoma upon surgical biopsy after a diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. A retrospective review was conducted of 476 vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed from May 2005 to January 2007 and a total of 70 cases of atypia were identified. Fifty cases (71%) were categorized as pure atypical ductal hyperplasia, 18 (26%) as pure flat epithelial atypia and two (3%) as concomitant flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Each group were compared with the subsequent open surgical specimens. Surgical biopsy was performed in 44 patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia, 15 patients with flat epithelial atypia, and two patients with flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Five cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ, three cases of flat epithelial atypia yielded one ductal carcinoma in situ and two cases of invasive ductal carcinoma, and one case of flat epithelial atypia/atypical ductal hyperplasia had invasive ductal carcinoma. The overall rate of malignancy was 16% for atypical ductal hyperplasia (including flat epithelial atypia/atypical ductal hyperplasia patients) and 20% for flat epithelial atypia. The presence of flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia at biopsy requires careful consideration, and surgical excision should be suggested. [source]

BS14 UPDATE ON IN SITU PROLIFERATIONS OF THE BREAST

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 2007
G. C. Harris
This is a pathologist's view of in situ proliferations of the breast, particularly those other than DCIS. The increasing evidence for Lobular Carcinoma In Situ (LCIS) as a non-obligate precursor, at least in some instances, and the emerging entity of pleomorphic LCIS will be discussed. Columnar cell proliferations including Flat Epithelial Atypia will also be presented with particular emphasis on clinical significance and currently recommended management strategies. A short discussion of other "indeterminate" in situ proliferations will also be included. [source]

Assessment of "grading" with Ki-67 and c-kit immunohistochemical expressions may be a helpful tool in management of patients with flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and columnar cell lesions (CCLs) on core breast biopsy

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009
Rosa M. Tomasino
It is essential to reach a better understanding of "flat epithelial atypia/columnar cell lesions" (FEA/CCLs) in breast core biopsies. Our aim was to explore their biological nature, in order to predict the likelihood of an upgrade to carcinoma. "Cytological grading" has been specially focused, in view of its possible utility in the choice of management. One hundred thirty of a total of 900 cases core needle (CN)/vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABs), with diagnoses of "hyperplasia" and "atypia" were retrospectively re-evaluated. Pathological findings of further excision biopsies (FEBs) performed in 40/75 patients with follow-up were compared with the previous diagnoses. In all cases, both Ki-67 and c-kit immunoreactivities were explored and compared with both normal breast tissues and subsequently documented cancers, with special reference to the hyperplastic FEA/CCLs, with "mild" atypia (FEA/CCHAm). Sixteen cases were re-diagnosed as "usual ductal hyperplasia" (UDH), 60 as "columnar cell hyperplasia" (CCH), and 54 as FEA/CCHA, 30 of which FEA/CCHAm and 24 FEA/CCHAh (with high atypia). Significantly, the Ki-67 index proved to be on the increase and c-kit expression on the decrease in FEA/CCHA lesions, mainly in the FEA/CCHAh group and in the subsequently observed cancers, compared with either benign tissues or the FEA/CCH cases. It was also significant that most of the carcinomas were found in FEBs within the FEA/CCHAh group. In this study cytological grading, together with Ki-67 and c-kit indices, proved to be helpful in FEA/CCLs evaluation. With regard to FEA/CCHAm lesions, an adequate surveillance appears to be a more appropriate management tool than FEB, as a result of their biological nature and behavior. J. Cell. Physiol. 221: 343,349, 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Tubular carcinoma and grade 1 (well-differentiated) invasive ductal carcinoma: Comparison of flat epithelial atypia and other intra-epithelial lesions

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 10 2008
Lakshmi P. Kunju
The distinction between tubular carcinomas (TC) and invasive well-differentiated (grade 1) ductal carcinoma (IDC) is important given treatment and prognostic differences. Studies have described a strong association between flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and TC. The incidence of FEA associated with grade 1 IDC is not well established. The aim of the present study was to assess morphology and intra-epithelial lesions between 14 TC and 18 grade 1 IDC matched for size. Of 14 TC, eight (57%) had associated FEA, seven (50%) had micropapillary atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), three (21%) had low nuclear grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and four (29%) had lobular neoplasia. Notably, only two of 18 (11%) grade 1 IDC had associated FEA. Three of 18 (16%) grade 1 IDC had ADH, two (11%) had lobular neoplasia, and seven (39%) had DCIS. All tubular carcinomas were estrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative for Her-2/neu overexpression. All grade 1 IDC were ER positive but 5% also overexpressed Her-2/neu. Axillary lymph node metastasis was present in 11% of grade 1 IDC and absent in TC. A strong association was found between TC, FEA, and micropapillary ADH, which may reflect a biological progression. Despite matching for tumor size, grade 1 IDC have a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and may have Her-2-neu overexpression compared to TC. [source]