Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
First Baby (first + baby)
Selected AbstractsPrevious experience of spontaneous or elective abortion and risk for posttraumatic stress and depression during subsequent pregnancyDEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, Issue 8 2010Lydia Hamama Abstract Background: Few studies have considered whether elective and/or spontaneous abortion (EAB/SAB) may be risk factors for mental health sequelae in subsequent pregnancy. This paper examines the impact of EAB/SAB on mental health during subsequent pregnancy in a sample of women involved in a larger prospective study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) across the childbearing year (n=1,581). Methods: Women expecting their first baby completed standardized telephone assessments including demographics, trauma history, PTSD, depression, and pregnancy wantedness, and religiosity. Results: Fourteen percent (n=221) experienced a prior elective abortion (EAB), 13.1% (n=206) experienced a prior spontaneous abortion (SAB), and 1.4% (n=22) experienced both. Of those women who experienced either an EAB or SAB, 13.9% (n=220) appraised the EAB or SAB experience as having been "a hard time" (i.e., potentially traumatic) and 32.6% (n=132) rated it as their index trauma (i.e., their worst or second worst lifetime exposure). Among the subset of 405 women with prior EAB or SAB, the rate of PTSD during the subsequent pregnancy was 12.6% (n,51), the rate of depression was 16.8% (n=68), and 5.4% (n,22) met criteria for both disorders. Conclusions: History of sexual trauma predicted appraising the experience of EAB or SAB as "a hard time." Wanting to be pregnant sooner was predictive of appraising the experience of EAB or SAB as the worst or second worst (index) trauma. EAB or SAB was appraised as less traumatic than sexual or medical trauma exposures and conveyed relatively lower risk for PTSD. The patterns of predictors for depression were similar. Depression and Anxiety, 2010.© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] A qualitative study of women's views about how health professionals communicate about infant feedingHEALTH EXPECTATIONS, Issue 4 2000Pat Hoddinott GP Objective To look at how communication by health professionals about infant feeding is perceived by first time mothers. Design Qualitative semi-structured interviews early in pregnancy and 6,10 weeks after birth. Subjects and setting Twenty-one white, low income women expecting their first baby were interviewed mostly at home, often with their partner or a relative. Results The personal and practical aspects of infant feeding which were important to women were seldom discussed in detail in ante-natal interviews. In post-natal interviews women described how words alone encouraging them to breastfeed were insufficient. Apprenticeship style learning of practical skills was valued, particularly time patiently spent watching them feed their baby. Women preferred to be shown skills rather than be told how to do them. Some felt pressure to breastfeed and bottle feeding mothers on post-natal wards felt neglected in comparison. Women preferred their own decision-making to be facilitated rather than being advised what to do. Some women experienced distress exposing their breasts and being touched by health professionals. Continuity of care and forming a personal relationship with a health professional who could reassure them were key factors associated with satisfaction with infant feeding communication. Conclusions The infant feeding goal for many women is a contented, thriving baby. In contrast, women perceive that the goal for health professionals is the continuation of breastfeeding. These differing goals can give rise to dissatisfaction with communication which is often seen as ,breastfeeding centred' rather than ,woman centred.' Words alone offering support for breastfeeding were often inadequate and women valued practical demonstrations and being shown how to feed their baby. Spending time with a caring midwife with whom the woman had developed a personal, continuing relationship was highly valued. Women were keen to maintain ownership, control and responsibility for their own decision-making about infant feeding. [source] New frontiers of assisted reproductive technology (Chien Tien Hsu Memorial Lecture 2007)JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 1 2009P. C. Ho Abstract Many significant advances have been made in assisted reproductive technology since the birth of the first baby conceived with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. The development of recombinant gonadotropins and gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists helps to simplify the ovarian stimulation. Excessive ovarian stimulation should be avoided because of the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and reduction in endometrial receptivity. Maturation of oocytes in vitro has been developed in some centers. It is still uncertain whether techniques such as assisted hatching, blastocyst transfer and pre-implantation aneuploidy screening can improve the live birth rates in assisted reproduction. The introduction of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for selection of human lymphocyte antigens (HLA) compatible embryos for treatment of siblings has raised ethical concerns. There is a higher risk of obstetric complications and congenital abnormalities even in singleton pregnancies achieved with assisted reproduction. Because of the risks of multiple pregnancies, elective single embryo transfer is increasingly used in good-prognosis patients. With a good freezing program, the cumulative pregnancy rate (including the pregnancies from subsequent replacement of frozen-thawed embryos) is not adversely affected. Improvement in cryopreservation techniques has made it possible to cryopreserve slices of ovarian tissue or oocytes, thus helping women who have to receive sterilizing forms of anti-cancer treatment to preserve their fertility. It is important that the development of the new techniques should be based on good scientific evidence. Ethical, legal and social implications should also be considered before the introduction of new techniques. [source] Do Italian Mothers Prefer Cesarean Delivery?BIRTH, Issue 2 2003Serena Donati MD ABSTRACT: Background: In Italy the proportion of births by cesarean section rose from 11.2 percent in 1980 to 27.9 percent in 1996 and 33.2 percent in 2000. The aim of this study was to identify factors, other than medical and obstetrical risk, that may influence the method of delivery and to analyze mother's preference for vaginal versus cesarean delivery among women after the birth of their first baby in university hospitals in Italy. Methods: Primiparous women were selected from 100 consecutive deliveries in 23 university hospitals in 1999. To determine antenatal, delivery, and postnatal history, and women's preference for method of delivery, trained health personnel interviewed 1986 women. Results: Of the 1986 women who were interviewed (response rate 95%), 1023 primiparas comprised the study sample. The cesarean section rate was 36 percent. Ninety-one percent of the women who delivered spontaneously and 73 percent of those who underwent a cesarean section would have preferred a vaginal delivery. Conclusions: Most of the interviewed women in this study preferred, or were satisfied with, vaginal birth. (BIRTH 30:2 June 2003) [source] Obstetric management of a woman's first delivery and the implications for pelvic floor surgery in later lifeBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 8 2005Ramalingam Uma Objective To determine the influence of intrapartum care during a first delivery on the risk of pelvic floor surgery in later life. Design Nested case,control study with record linkage of a historical cohort and a current morbidity database. Setting Hospital births in Dundee 1952,1966. Population The 7556 primiparous women from the Walker cohort. Methods The cases (n= 352) were women who delivered a first singleton baby at term (,37 weeks) and subsequently had pelvic floor surgery. Controls (n= 1403) were women who delivered their first baby during the same time period and did not undergo surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed taking account of demographic, anthropometric and obstetric factors. Main outcome measure Pelvic floor surgery. Results Caesarean section was associated with a reduced risk of pelvic floor surgery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (odds ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.05,0.55). Forceps delivery and infant birthweight >4.0 kg were not identified as significant risk factors (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71, 1.25, and OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.50, 1.75, respectively). Episiotomy and prolonged labour (>12 hours) may be associated risk factors but were of borderline significance (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.99, 2.10, and OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.00, 2.27). Conclusion Caesarean section in a first pregnancy appears to protect against pelvic floor surgery in later life. [source] | ||||||||||