Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Alendronate Treatment (alendronate + treatment)
Selected AbstractsSerum TRACP 5b Is a Useful Marker for Monitoring Alendronate Treatment: Comparison With Other Markers of Bone Turnover,JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 10 2005Arja Nenonen MSc Abstract We studied clinical performance of serum TRACP 5b and other bone turnover markers, including S-CTX, U-DPD, S-PINP, S-BALP, and S-OC, for monitoring alendronate treatment. TRACP 5b had higher clinical sensitivity, area under the ROC curve, and signal-to-noise ratio than the other markers. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of serum TRACP 5b (S-TRACP5b) with that of other markers of bone turnover in the monitoring of alendronate treatment. Materials and Methods: This double-blinded study included 148 healthy postmenopausal women that were randomly assigned into two groups: one receiving 5 mg alendronate daily (n = 75) and the other receiving placebo (n = 73) for 12 months. All individuals in both groups received calcium and vitamin D daily. The bone resorption markers S-TRACP5b, serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (S-CTX), and total urinary deoxypyridinoline (U-DPD), and the serum markers of bone formation procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (S-PINP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (S-BALP), and total osteocalcin (S-OC) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of treatment. Lumbar spine BMD (LBMD) was measured at baseline and 12 months. Results: Compared with the placebo group, LBMD increased, and all bone markers decreased significantly more in the alendronate group (p < 0.001 for each parameter). The decrease of S-TRACP5b after first 3 months of alendronate treatment correlated significantly with the changes of all other markers except S-OC, the best correlation being with S-CTX (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001). The changes of LBMD at 12 months only correlated significantly with the changes of S-TRACP5b (r = ,0.32, p = 0.005) and S-CTX (r = ,0.24, p = 0.037) at 3 months. Based on clinical sensitivity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and signal-to-noise ratio, S-TRACP5b, S-CTX, and S-PINP were the best markers for monitoring alendronate treatment. Clinical sensitivity, area under the ROC curve, and signal-to-noise ratio were higher for S-TRACP5b than for the other markers. Conclusion: These results show that S-TRACP5b, S-CTX, and S-PINP are useful markers for monitoring alendronate treatment. [source] In vivo microfocal computed tomography and micro,magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of antiresorptive and antiinflammatory drugs as preventive treatments of osteoarthritis in the ratARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2010Michael D. Jones Objective To determine whether treatment with an antiresorptive drug in combination with an antiinflammatory drug reduces periarticular bone and soft tissue adaptations associated with the progression of posttraumatic secondary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods We used in vivo microfocal computed tomography (micro-CT) to map bony adaptations and in vivo micro,magnetic resonance imaging (micro-MRI) to examine joint inflammation in a rat model of surgically induced OA secondary to knee triad injury. We examined the arthroprotective effects of the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam. Results Micro-CT revealed reduced levels of periarticular trabecular bone loss in animals with knee triad injury treated with the bisphosphonate drugs alendronate or risedronate, or the NSAID meloxicam, compared with untreated animals. Alendronate treatment reduced bony osteophyte development. While risedronate as a monotherapy did not positively impact osteophytogenesis, combination therapy with risedronate and meloxicam reduced osteophyte severity somewhat. Micro-MRI revealed an increased, diffuse water signal in the epiphyses of untreated rats with knee triad injury 8 weeks after surgery, suggestive of a bone marrow lesion,like stimulus. In contrast, meloxicam-treated rats showed a significant reduction in fluid signal compared with both bisphosphonate-treated groups 8 weeks after surgery. Histologic analysis qualitatively confirmed the chondroprotective effect of both bisphosphonate treatments, showing fewer degradative changes compared with untreated rats with knee triad injury. Conclusion Our findings indicate that select combinations of bisphosphonate and NSAID drug therapy in the early stages of secondary OA preserve trabecular bone mass and reduce the impact of osteophytic bony adaptations and bone marrow lesion,like stimulus. Bisphosphonate and NSAID therapy may be an effective disease-modifying drug regimen if administered early after the initial injury. [source] Serum TRACP 5b Is a Useful Marker for Monitoring Alendronate Treatment: Comparison With Other Markers of Bone Turnover,JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 10 2005Arja Nenonen MSc Abstract We studied clinical performance of serum TRACP 5b and other bone turnover markers, including S-CTX, U-DPD, S-PINP, S-BALP, and S-OC, for monitoring alendronate treatment. TRACP 5b had higher clinical sensitivity, area under the ROC curve, and signal-to-noise ratio than the other markers. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of serum TRACP 5b (S-TRACP5b) with that of other markers of bone turnover in the monitoring of alendronate treatment. Materials and Methods: This double-blinded study included 148 healthy postmenopausal women that were randomly assigned into two groups: one receiving 5 mg alendronate daily (n = 75) and the other receiving placebo (n = 73) for 12 months. All individuals in both groups received calcium and vitamin D daily. The bone resorption markers S-TRACP5b, serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (S-CTX), and total urinary deoxypyridinoline (U-DPD), and the serum markers of bone formation procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (S-PINP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (S-BALP), and total osteocalcin (S-OC) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of treatment. Lumbar spine BMD (LBMD) was measured at baseline and 12 months. Results: Compared with the placebo group, LBMD increased, and all bone markers decreased significantly more in the alendronate group (p < 0.001 for each parameter). The decrease of S-TRACP5b after first 3 months of alendronate treatment correlated significantly with the changes of all other markers except S-OC, the best correlation being with S-CTX (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001). The changes of LBMD at 12 months only correlated significantly with the changes of S-TRACP5b (r = ,0.32, p = 0.005) and S-CTX (r = ,0.24, p = 0.037) at 3 months. Based on clinical sensitivity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and signal-to-noise ratio, S-TRACP5b, S-CTX, and S-PINP were the best markers for monitoring alendronate treatment. Clinical sensitivity, area under the ROC curve, and signal-to-noise ratio were higher for S-TRACP5b than for the other markers. Conclusion: These results show that S-TRACP5b, S-CTX, and S-PINP are useful markers for monitoring alendronate treatment. [source] Differential Effects of Teriparatide and Alendronate on Bone Remodeling in Postmenopausal Women Assessed by Histomorphometric Parameters,JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 7 2005Monique Arlot MD Abstract An 18-month randomized double-blind study was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis to compare the effects of once-daily teriparatide 20 ,g with alendronate 10 mg on bone histomorphometry. Biopsies were obtained from 42 patients. Indices of bone formation were significantly higher after 6 or 18 months of teriparatide compared with alendronate treatment. Introduction: Alendronate and teriparatide increased BMD, assessed by DXA, by different mechanisms of action, supported by changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to explore the differential effects of these two osteoporosis treatments at the bone tissue level by examining bone histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover after either 6 or 18 months of treatment. Materials and Methods: Patients were a cohort from a randomized parallel double-blind study conducted to compare the effects of once-daily teriparatide 20 ,g and alendronate 10 mg in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Transiliac crest bone biopsies were obtained after tetracycline double labeling from 42 patients treated for 6 months (n = 23) or 18 months (n = 14); 5 additional patients were biopsied from contralateral sides at 6 and 18 months. Biopsy specimens adequate for quantitative analysis were analyzed by 2D histomorphometry from 17 patients at 6 months (teriparatide, n = 8; alendronate, n = 9) and 15 patients at 18 months (teriparatide, n = 8; alendronate, n = 7). Data were analyzed by two-sample tests. Results: Histomorphometric indices of bone formation were significantly and markedly greater in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group at 6 and 18 months, whereas indices of bone resorption were only significantly greater in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group at 6 months. Bone formation and activation frequency were significantly lower at 18 months compared with 6 months in the teriparatide group, returning to levels comparable with untreated postmenopausal women. In the teriparatide group, the peak in histomorphometric bone formation indices coincided with peak levels for N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen, a biochemical marker of bone formation. The degree of mineralization was lower at 18 months than at 6 months with treatment in both groups but was not different between groups. Conclusions: These results confirm the opposite mechanisms of action of teriparatide and alendronate on bone remodeling and confirm the bone formation effect of teriparatide. [source] Effect of Alendronate on the Age-Specific Incidence of Symptomatic Osteoporotic FracturesJOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 6 2005Marc C Hochberg MD Abstract Analyses of data from 3658 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial showed that alendronate is effective in reducing the risk of symptomatic osteoporotic fractures across a spectrum of ages. Introduction: Most osteoporosis studies examine the relative risk of fracture based on the entire duration of treatment. Because older patients tend to be at higher risk for osteoporosis-related fractures, this analysis examined the effect of alendronate treatment on the relative risk of fracture in terms of the age that patients attained during the study. Materials and Methods: We studied 3658 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis 55-80 years of age at baseline enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial, a large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were treated with placebo or with alendronate at a daily dose of 5 mg for 2 years followed by 10 mg for an additional 1-2.5 years, and monitored for clinical fractures. Age, rather than study time, was the dynamic variable in our analysis. Results: The relative risk reductions for hip, clinical spine, and wrist fractures were constant across age groups, without evidence of a decline at older ages. Specifically, alendronate reduced the risk of clinical fracture by 53% at the hip (relative risk [RR] = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.27-0.81; p < 0.01), 45% at the spine (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.37-0.83; p < 0.01), and 31% at the wrist (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.50-0.98; p = 0.038). In addition, alendronate produced a significant risk reduction of 40% (RR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.47-0.77; p < 0.01) for the composite event of clinical hip, spine, and wrist fractures. As a consequence of the constant relative risk model, the absolute risk reduction with alendronate treatment increased with age because of the age-related increase in fracture risk in the placebo group. The absolute risk reduction for the composite event (hip, spine, and wrist fractures together) for alendronate treatment versus placebo was 65, 80, 111, and 161 women with fractures per 10,000 PYR for the 55 to <65, 65 to <70, 70 to <75, and 75-85 year age groups, respectively. Conclusions: These data show that alendronate is effective in reducing the risk of symptomatic osteoporotic fractures across a spectrum of ages. The effectiveness is somewhat greater in patients with femoral neck T score , ,2.5 than in those with a T score , ,2.0. [source] Local alendronate increases fixation of implants inserted with bone compaction: 12-week canine studyJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 4 2007Thomas Jakobsen Abstract Bone compaction has been shown to increase initial implant fixation. Furthermore, bone compaction creates a peri-implant zone of autograft that exerts osteoconductive properties. We have previously shown that locally applied bisphosphonate (alendronate) at 4-week observation can preserve the autograft generated by bone compaction. We now investigate whether the increased amount of autograft, seen at 4 weeks, can increase implant osseointegration and biomechanical fixation. Porous-coated titanium implants were bilaterally inserted with bone compaction into the proximal part of tibia of 10 dogs. On the right side, local bisphosphonate was injected into the bone cavity prior to bone compaction immediately prior to implant insertion. On the left side, saline was used as control. Observation period was 12 weeks. Locally applied bisphosphonate significantly increased biomechanical implant fixation (approximately twofold), bone-to-implant contact (1.2-fold), and peri-implant bone volume fraction (2.3-fold). This study indicates that local alendronate treatment can increase early implant osseointegration and biomechanical fixation of implants inserted by use of bone compaction. Long term effects remain unknown. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 25:432,441, 2007 [source] Alendronate prevents femoral periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty: Prospective randomized double-blind studyJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 7 2006Mohammad Arabmotlagh Abstract Following total hip arthroplasty (THA), femoral periprosthetic bone undergoes a remodeling process that results in bone loss in its proximal regions that may compromise the long-term outcome of THA. Periprosthetic bone loss mainly occurs during the first postoperative months. The question is whether a postoperative treatment with alendronate is effective in reducing periprosthetic bone loss and which doses and duration of treatment are required. In a 12-month prospective, randomized double-blind study, 51 patients undergoing cementless THA were treated postoperatively either with a daily dose of 20 mg alendronate for 2 months and 10 mg for 2 months thereafter (group I), with 20 mg of alendronate for 2 months and 10 mg for 4 months thereafter (group II), or treated with placebo (group III). Proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and serum biochemical markers of bone turnover bone specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and C-terminal telopeptides (CTX-I) were assayed. Six months of alendronate treatment significantly reduced (p,<,0.001) bone loss in proximal medial region (,10%) compared with placebo (,26%). All biochemical markers of bone turnover were suppressed by alendronate. These data suggest that alendronate administered for the first 6 postoperative months following THA was effective in preventing early periprosthetic bone loss. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:1336,1341, 2006 [source] Effects of Bisphosphonate on the Endochondral Bone Formation of the Mandibular CondyleANATOMIA, HISTOLOGIA, EMBRYOLOGIA, Issue 5 2009M. S. Kim Summary The development of the mandibular condylar cartilage is important for the overall growth of the mandible. However, there have been a few researches into medical approaches aimed at controlling condylar growth. This study examined the effects of bisphosphonate on the growth of the condylar cartilage. Alendronate (3.5 mg/kg/week) was administered to postnatal day 1 SD rats for 7 and 10 days. The thickness of each chondrocyte layer and the level of MMP-9 expression were measured. The anteroposterior diameter of the developing condyle was unaffected by the alendronate treatment for 7 days (P > 0.05). The total thickness of the cartilage layers was also unaffected by the treatment for 7 days (P > 0.05). In particular, there was no change in the thickness of the perichondrium and reserve cell layer at the measured condylar regions (P > 0.05). However, the thickness of the proliferating cell layer was reduced significantly, whereas the thickness of hypertrophied cartilage layer was increased (P < 0.05). The number of chondroclasts engaged in hypertrophied cartilage resorption was reduced significantly by the alendronate treatment (P < 0.05). The level of MMP-9 expression was reduced at both the transcription and translation levels by the alendronate treatment for 7 and 10 days. These results indicate that alendronate (>3.5 mg/kg/week) inhibits the longitudinal growth of the mandibular condyle by inhibiting chondrocyte proliferation and the resorption of hypertrophied cartilage for ossification. [source] Effects of Alendronate on A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with Thrombospondin Motifs Expression in the Developing Epiphyseal Cartilage in RatsANATOMIA, HISTOLOGIA, EMBRYOLOGIA, Issue 2 2009M. S. Kim Summary A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) have been reported to play a role in the degradation of aggrecan, a major component of cartilage. This study was performed to examine the effects of alendronate on the expression of ADAMTS in developing femoral epiphyseal cartilage. Primary cultured chondrocytes from this cartilage were treated with alendronate in vitro and postnatal day 1 rats were injected subcutaneously with alendronate (1 mg/kg) every second day in vivo. The number of cultured chondrocytes and their aggrecan mRNA levels were unaffected by the alendronate treatment at 10,6 to 10,4 m concentrations. The mRNA levels of ADAMTS-1, -2 and -9 in chondrocytes were also unaffected. However, the levels of ADAMTS-5 and -4 were reduced significantly by the same treatment. The thickness of the proliferating chondrocyte layers and the aggrecan mRNA levels in the epiphysis were unaffected by the alendronate treatment in vivo. However, the hypertrophied chondrocyte layers became significantly thicker, and the size of the secondary ossification centre was reduced significantly by the same treatment (P < 0.05). Both ADAMTS-4 and -5 mRNA expressions were also reduced significantly in vivo. The immunoreactivity against ADAMTS-4 was seen in hypertrophied chondrocytes and reduced significantly by the alendronate treatment. These results suggested that alendronate can inhibit the degradation of aggrecan in the articular cartilage by downregulating the expression of matrix enzymes such as ADAMTS-4 and -5. [source] | |||||||||||||