Home  About us  Contact
 

Fibular Free Flap (fibular + free_flap)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Reconstruction of the Through-and-Through Anterior Mandibulectomy Defect: Indications and Limitations of the Double-Skin Paddle Fibular Free Flap,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 8 2008
Frederic W.-B.
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this report is to describe our recent experience using a double-skin paddle fibular free flap (DSPFFF) for reconstruction of the through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defect and to present a reconstructive algorithm based on the extent of lip and mental skin resection. Study Design: Retrospective review of 10 consecutive patients with through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defects. Methods: Outcomes that were examined included methods of reconstruction based on the cutaneous defect, flap complications, fistula rate, and donor site complications. Results: Seven patients were reconstructed with a DSPFFF. For lip reconstruction, two patients were also concomitantly reconstructed with Karapandzic or lip advancement flaps. Three patients were reconstructed with both a fibular free flap and a second free flap (1 radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap and 2 anterolateral thigh flaps). The transverse dimensions of the DSPFFFs were as great as 15 cm. None of the patients developed a fistula. All free tissue transfers were successful. One patient developed partial loss of the fibular skin paddle used for submental skin replacement. Conclusions: DSPFFF is a safe and reliable way to reconstruct an anterior through-and-through mandibular defect. Indications for using a DSPFFF are 1) a cutaneous defect that lies at or below the plane of the reconstructed mandible, 2) a transverse width of the oral mucosa and cutaneous defect that does not exceed 15 cm (the approximate distance from the mid-calf to the anterior midline), and 3) a lip defect that, if present, can be reconstructed with local flaps. [source]

Synchronous reconstruction of the floor of mouth and chin with a single skin island fibular free flap

MICROSURGERY, Issue 4 2008
F.A.C.S., Richard O. Wein M.D.
Objectives: The goal this presentation is to: 1) Review the reconstructive options for anterior mandible through-and-through composite defects and 2) Instruct the audience in the application of the double-skin paddle fibular flap in selected patients. Methods: Case presentation with review of the literature. Results: A 70-year old male with an anterior floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma underwent composite resection that included resection of a 5-cm ovoid component of overlying chin skin. The defect was reconstructed with a fibular osteocutaneous flap with a double skin paddle technique. Conclusions: Several reconstructive options have been described in the literature for extended oral cavity defects including the use of multiple free flaps, combinations of regional and distant flaps, and sequential reconstruction. This case report reviews the use of a single flap reconstruction of these defects for selected patients. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2008. [source]

Reconstruction of the Through-and-Through Anterior Mandibulectomy Defect: Indications and Limitations of the Double-Skin Paddle Fibular Free Flap,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 8 2008
Frederic W.-B.
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this report is to describe our recent experience using a double-skin paddle fibular free flap (DSPFFF) for reconstruction of the through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defect and to present a reconstructive algorithm based on the extent of lip and mental skin resection. Study Design: Retrospective review of 10 consecutive patients with through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defects. Methods: Outcomes that were examined included methods of reconstruction based on the cutaneous defect, flap complications, fistula rate, and donor site complications. Results: Seven patients were reconstructed with a DSPFFF. For lip reconstruction, two patients were also concomitantly reconstructed with Karapandzic or lip advancement flaps. Three patients were reconstructed with both a fibular free flap and a second free flap (1 radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap and 2 anterolateral thigh flaps). The transverse dimensions of the DSPFFFs were as great as 15 cm. None of the patients developed a fistula. All free tissue transfers were successful. One patient developed partial loss of the fibular skin paddle used for submental skin replacement. Conclusions: DSPFFF is a safe and reliable way to reconstruct an anterior through-and-through mandibular defect. Indications for using a DSPFFF are 1) a cutaneous defect that lies at or below the plane of the reconstructed mandible, 2) a transverse width of the oral mucosa and cutaneous defect that does not exceed 15 cm (the approximate distance from the mid-calf to the anterior midline), and 3) a lip defect that, if present, can be reconstructed with local flaps. [source]