Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Fibrillation Induction (fibrillation + induction)
Selected AbstractsReentry Site During Fibrillation Induction in Relation to Defibrillation Efficacy for Different Shock WaveformsJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001Ph.D., RAYMOND E. IDEKER M.D. Reentry Site and Defibrillation Waveform Efficacy.Introduction: Unsuccessful defibrillation shocks may reinitiate fibrillation by causing postshock reentry. Methods and Results: To better understand why some waveforms are more efficacious for defibrillation, reentry was induced in six dogs with 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16-msec monophasic and 1/1- (both phases 1 msec) 2/2-, 4/4-, and 8/8-msec biphasic shocks. Reentry was initiated by 141 ± 15 V shocks delivered from a defibrillator with a 150- , F capacitance during the vulnerable period of paced rhythm (183 ± 12 msec after the last pacing stimulus). The shock potential gradient field was orthogonal to the dispersion of refractoriness. Activation was mapped with 121 electrodes covering 4 × 4 cm of the right ventricular epicardium, and potential gradient and degree of recovery of excitability were estimated at the sites of reentry. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were estimated by an up-down protocol for the same nine waveforms in eight dogs internally and in nine other dogs externally. DFT voltages for the different waveforms were positively correlated with the magnitude of shock potential gradient and negatively correlated with the recovery interval at the site at which reentry was induced by the waveform during paced rhythm for both internal (DFT = 1719 + 64.5 , V , 11.1RI; R2= 0.93) and external defibrillation (DFT = 3445 + 150 , V , 22RI; R2= 0.93). Conclusion: The defibrillation waveforms with the lowest DFTs were those that induced reentry at sites of low shock potential gradient, indicating efficacious stimulation of myocardium. Additionally, the site of reentry induced by waveforms with the lowest DFTs was in myocardium that was more highly recovered just before the shock, perhaps because this high degree of recovery seldom occurs during defibrillation due to the rapid activation rate during fibrillation. [source] Atrial Fibrillation Induction and Determination of Atrial Vulnerable Period Using Very Low Energy Synchronized Biatrial Shock in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Atrial FibrillationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2000HUNG-FAT TSE The atrial vulnerable periods (A VP)for shock induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) in humans have not been clearly defined. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of using low energy biatrial shock delivered transvenously for AF induction are unknown. We tested the safety and efficacy of using very low energy biatrial shocks, delivered between the right atrium and the coronary sinus for AF induction and used this technique to characterize the A VP in nine controls and nine patients with AF. Thirty-volt and 60-V 3/3-ms biphasic shocks were delivered, starting from 50 ms before the atrial effective refractory period with 20-ms increments until the end of the QRS interval to determine the AVP front, AVP end, and the AVP duration. Successful AF induction could be achieved in eight (89%) of the nine controls and in nine (100%) of the nine patients with AF without any complication. In patients with AF, the AVP front started significantly earlier within the QRS complex, and the AVP duration and the AVP duration/QRS percent ratios were also significantly greater as compared to controls. Furthermore, a higher induction shock energy in patients with AF was associated with an increase in AF inducibility and significantly increased the AVP duration and A VP duration/QRS percent ratio as compared to the controls. This study demonstrated the safe and efficacy of delivering a very low energy biatrial shock during the AVP within the R wave for AF induction. The characteristics of A VP in patients with AF were significantly different from normal subjects. [source] The Proinflammatory Cytokine Response following Resuscitation in the Swine Model Depends on the Method of Ventricular Fibrillation InductionACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 10 2008James T. Niemann MD Abstract Objectives:, A systemic inflammatory response has been reported following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study was to compare the magnitude of the tumor necrosis factor-, (TNF-,) response in two different swine models of ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest. Methods:, This was a randomized comparative trial conducted with domestic swine (N = 28, mean weight 40 kg, range 34,49 kg) of both genders. Anesthetized and instrumented swine were randomized to electrically induced VF (n = 14) or spontaneous VF induced by occlusion of a coronary artery (n = 14). After 8 minutes of VF, countershocks were given and standard advanced cardiac life support was initiated. Resuscitated animals were observed for 3 hours, and hemodynamics, base excess, and TNF-, concentrations were measured at intervals. Results:, TNF-, concentrations were significantly greater in the ischemic VF group throughout the postresuscitation period. Multivariate modeling demonstrated that the TNF-, level was dependent on the method of VF induction and correlated with ischemia time (untreated VF period plus time to restoration of circulation) and the degree of postresuscitation hypoperfusion as reflected in base excess measurements. Conclusions:, This study demonstrates that TNF-, concentrations increase after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and that the TNF-, response is more profound in animals subjected to ischemic, spontaneous VF. The observed differences may be due to a longer resuscitation time and persistent postresuscitation hypoperfusion in the ischemic VF group. These differences need to be considered in studies evaluating mechanisms of postresuscitation organ dysfunction and defining mortality markers. [source] Simultaneous Atrial and Ventricular Anti-Tachycardia Pacing as a Novel Method of Rhythm DiscriminationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 7 2006SAMIR SABA M.D. Background: Inappropriate shocks remain a problem in patients with defibrillators (ICD). Objective: To evaluate a new discrimination algorithm for supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular (VT) tachycardias, based on the response to simultaneous (A+V) atrial (A) and ventricular (V) anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods: Patients undergoing electrophysiological testing or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation were enrolled (N = 32) and underwent A+V ATP through a Marquis ICD with investigational software. If persisting after ATP, the rhythm was classified as VT if the first electrical event was sensed on the V channel and as an SVT otherwise. Results: Arrhythmia sequences (N = 275; 53 VT; 222 SVT) were analyzed in 26 patients (age = 51 ± 17 years, 13 men, LVEF = 0.49 ± 0.14). In response to A+V ATP, 55% of SVT versus 41% of VT episodes were terminated (P = NS). Termination of VT but not of SVT was more likely with faster (50% at ATP/arrhythmia cycle length (CL) = 0.81 vs 8% at ATP/arrhythmia CL = 0.88, P = 0.02) but not with longer ATP bursts (P = NS). Of the 115 arrhythmias that persisted after A+V ATP, the algorithm correctly classified 24 of 24 VT (GEE-adjusted sensitivity = 100%) and 85 of 91 SVT (GEE-adjusted specificity = 93%). Proarrhythmia was noted after two A+V ATP, in the form of atrial fibrillation induction and VT acceleration. Conclusions: We describe a new algorithm that can discriminate between SVT and VT with a high sensitivity and specificity. This form of ATP can terminate 55% of SVT sequences. The performance of this new algorithm merits further testing in a large population of dual-chamber ICD patients. [source] | ||||||||||