			Home About us Contact

Fentanyl Group (fentanyl + group)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Epidural sufentanil provides better analgesia from 24 h after surgery compared with epidural fentanyl in children

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 10 2008
J. E. CHO
Background: Studies comparing epidural fentanyl and sufentanil in adults reported a similar analgesic effect with variable side effects. We hypothesized that epidural fentanyl and sufentanil will have a similar analgesic effect in children undergoing urological surgery. Methods: Sixty-four children undergoing urological surgery were randomized into two groups: fentanyl in ropivacaine (fentanyl group, n=32) and sufentanil in ropivacaine (sufentanil group, n=32). After anaesthesia, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L2,3, L3,4 or L4,5 interspace. For post-operative pain relief, a solution consisting of fentanyl 0.1 mcg/kg/ml or sufentanil 0.015 mcg/kg/ml in 1.5 mg/ml ropivacaine was infused at a rate of 2 ml/h. To assess post-operative pain, the faces pain scale and the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability score were recorded at 1, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery. The incidence of adverse effects such as hypoxia, sedation, pruritus, nausea and/or vomiting was also evaluated. Results: Pain scores demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. The need for rescue analgesia during 24,72 h was higher in the fentanyl group than in the sufentanil group (6/32 vs. 0/32, P=0.012). The incidence of pruritus was higher in the sufentanil group compared with that in the fentanyl group (5/32 vs. 0/32). Conclusions: Epidural sufentanil provides better analgesia from 24 h after surgery compared with epidural fentanyl in infants and children undergoing urological surgery. The incidence of pruritus in the sufentanil group was higher than that in the fentanyl group. [source]

Clinical trial: a randomized, study comparing meperidine (pethidine) and fentanyl in adult gastrointestinal endoscopy

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 8 2009
D. J. ROBERTSON
Summary Background, There is little evidence to guide choice between meperidine (pethidine) and fentanyl for sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aim, To compare meperidine with fentanyl in terms of procedure time and analgesia. Methods, Single centre randomized controlled trial. Patients received narcotic doses and midazolam at the discretion of the attending endoscopist who was unaware of narcotic assignment. Endoscopy and recovery times were then recorded. The main outcome was total procedure time, defined as endoscopy time plus recovery time. Patient discomfort was assessed prior to discharge via visual analogue scale (VAS). Results, In total, 55 patients were randomized to meperidine [44 colonoscopy and 11 esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)] and 56 to fentanyl (45 colonoscopy and 11 EGD). Total procedure time was shorter for those receiving fentanyl (mean = 87.7 min) than for those receiving meperidine (mean = 102.9 min) (P = 0.05). The difference between the groups was explained by a shorter mean recovery time in the fentanyl group (63.0 min) than in the meperidine group (76.2 min) (P = 0.07). Based on post procedure pain scores, examinations with meperidine (mean = 1.99) were less painful when compared with those receiving fentanyl (mean = 2.86, P = 0.03). Conclusions, Fentanyl shortened total procedure time by reducing recovery time. A simple change in narcotic choice could increase endoscopy unit efficiency. [source]

Presurgical fentanyl vs caudal block and the incidence of adverse respiratory events in children after orchidopexy

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 12 2009
SAMIA N. KHALIL MD
Summary Background:, There is controversy about the etiology of early postoperative hypoxemia. Age, weight, intubation, surgical procedure, use of muscle relaxants, and/or administration of opioids may affect the incidence of early postoperative hypoxemia. In this prospective, randomized, and single-blinded study, we evaluated whether the administration of caudal analgesia vs i.v. fentanyl affected the number of children who develop postextubation adverse upper airway respiratory events, (upper airway obstruction, laryngospasm) and/or early postoperative hypoxemia. Methods/materials:, Institutional approval and written parental informed consents were obtained. Thirty-eight healthy outpatient boys, aged 1,6 years, scheduled for elective orchidopexy were randomized to receive pain relief either with a presurgical caudal block or by i.v. fentanyl. The primary outcome of the study was the number of children who developed postextubation adverse upper airway respiratory events and/or early postoperative hypoxemia. Results:, The number of boys who developed postextubation adverse upper airway respiratory events and/or early postoperative hypoxemia in the caudal group was less compared with those in the fentanyl group (P = 0.04). Conclusions:, Compared to fentanyl, placement of a presurgical caudal block in boys scheduled for orchidopexy was associated with a lower incidence of postextubation adverse upper airway respiratory events and/or early postoperative hypoxemia. [source]

The effect of intrathecal fentanyl on Cerebral State Index-guided sedation during spinal anaesthesia,

ANAESTHESIA, Issue 12 2009
J. Y. Kim
Summary This study investigated the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the dose of propofol during sedation guided by Cerebral State Index monitoring. Seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive either fentanyl 25 ,g (n = 35) or normal saline (n = 35) with hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg for spinal anaesthesia. Propofol was infused to maintain a Cerebral State Index value of 65,75 for 30 min. The propofol infusion time and dose required to reach a Cerebral State Index value of 75 were recorded together with the time required to reach a Cerebral State Index value higher than 90 after cessation of sedation. The onset time for sedation was faster and the recovery time was slower in the fentanyl group compared to those in the saline group (p = 0.018 and 0.027, respectively). The propofol doses required for onset and maintenance of sedation were significantly lower in the fentanyl group compared to those in the control group (p = 0.018 and < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, adding intrathecal fentanyl 25 ,g during spinal anaesthesia significantly reduced the dose of propofol required for sedation and prolonged the subsequent recovery time. [source]