Home About us Contact | |||
Family Practitioners (family + practitioner)
Selected AbstractsBuilding our global family , achieving treatment for allHAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2010M. W. SKINNER Summary., Building our global family by reaching out to women, children and youth and those in sub-Saharan Africa to achieve Treatment for All. The World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) has committed to recognizing and incorporating the critical and important challenges that are faced by women with bleeding disorders within our global family. The next crucial steps include the development of outreach and registry programmes which can be adapted globally to accelerate the identification of such women, and to educate and guide them to the appropriate clinical care setting. Equally important, awareness must be raised within the broader medical community where women would typically first present with clinical symptoms. Family practitioners, nurse-midwives, obstetricians, gynaecologists and community health clinics will increasingly be strategic and central to WFH outreach efforts, in addition to serving as new care partners essential to the multidisciplinary model of care. Adapting and implementing the WFH development model regionally within Africa is proving to be a successful approach both for the introduction as well as the development of sustainable national care programmes for patients with bleeding disorders. The targeted development of solid national programmes such as in South Africa, Senegal and Kenya has expanded the training capacity of the WFH, as well as providing key regional examples. Local medical professionals are now responsible for providing the training in many regional programmes. Children with bleeding disorders in low-income countries are at great risk of dying young. WFH data demonstrate that among such patients, as the economic capacity of a country decreases so does the ratio of adults to children. The organization of care, training of a multi-disciplinary healthcare team, and education of patients and their families lead to improved mortality independent of economic capacity or increased clotting factor concentrate availability. Additionally, through enhanced youth education, awareness and engagement, we will assure continuity within WFH national member organizations, build greater unity within our global family and capture the innovation and creativity of their ideas to improve Treatment for All. [source] Cardiac Risk Factors and the Use of Triptans: A Survey StudyHEADACHE, Issue 7 2000William B. Young MD Objective.,To describe current practice in triptan use. Background.,Triptans are effective migraine treatments that cause chest symptoms in some patients. True cardiac ischemia is rare. Design.,Headache specialists and family practitioners completed questionnaires regarding the times when triptans are contraindicated, obtaining electrocardiograms (ECGs), and giving the first dose in the office. Results.,Sixty-five headache specialists and 67 family practitioners responded. Headache specialists saw an average of 36.3 patients with headache per week. Family practitioners saw an average of 7.2. Family practitioners and headache specialists had similar opinions regarding the age at which triptans were contraindicated with various numbers of risk factors. Sixty-one percent of headache specialists and 50% of family practitioners would not use a triptan at any age for patients with more than three risk factors (P = NS). Ten percent of headache specialists obtained an ECG for all patients being prescribed triptans, while no family practitioners did (P = .008). Ten percent of both family practitioners and headache specialists never obtained an ECG, even with multiple cardiac risk factors. Headache specialists obtained ECGs more often than family practitioners (P < .002 for one to three risk factors). Family practitioners were more likely to give the first dose of the triptan in the office regardless of cardiovascular risk (58% versus 20%, P < .001). Forty-five percent of headache specialists and 2% of family practitioners never gave the first dose in the office (P < .001). Family practitioners gave the first dose in the office more readily than headache specialists in patients with no risk factors (P = .001), but not for one or more risk factors. Conclusions.,No consensus exists among family practitioners or headache specialists about when to avoid using a triptan due to excessive cardiac risk factors, when to obtain an ECG prior to using a triptan, and when to give the first dose of a triptan in the office. Headache specialists are more likely to obtain ECGs, whereas family practitioners are more likely to give the first dose of a triptan in the office. [source] Patterns of care and referral in children with atopic dermatitis and concern for food allergyDERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, Issue 2 2006Michele M. Thompson ABSTRACT:, Although many providers believe that up to 30% of atopic dermatitis (AD) is food induced, food challenge studies show that food-induced eczematous reactions are rare. When food allergy is suggested to cause AD, it often leads to allergy testing with a high false-positivity rate, in turn further focusing parents on food allergy. Study subjects were children less than 11 years old with AD and food allergy suspicion. Prior diagnoses, provider, and testing patterns were assessed by questionnaire given to the parents. Thirty-eight patients with AD were enrolled. Most subject's parents suspected food allergy induced AD. Initial skin diagnoses were made by pediatricians (79%) and family practitioners (18%) as eczema. Allergy was suggested by providers as cause for AD in 63% of the present study's patients. Seventy-nine percent had allergy testing. Greater than 90% of parents claimed their children had food allergy and food-induced AD. Sixty-six percent had positive food allergy tests and 37% had definite history of immediate IgE reactions to food. The majority of this population had allergy suggested as causative for eczema by their primary care provider and were subsequently evaluated by allergist and allergy testing. Consensus about the role of food allergy between the different providers of AD in children would result in more effective, efficient, and less costly health care. [source] Overview of treatment of acute migraineDRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, Issue 7 2007Arthur H. Elkind Abstract Acute migraine is a major public health problem with a significant economic burden secondary to short-term disability and absenteeism. Treatment of acute migraine is always challenging for primary care physicians and family practitioners, as there are no set universal guidelines for the treatment of acute migraine. In acute migraine treatment, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), migraine-specific medications, and adjunctive medications are used, depending on the severity of acute migraine attacks. Treatment of acute migraine has changed drastically since the introduction of the triptans. However, even after the introduction of triptans, nearly one-half of migraine sufferers are still being treated with over-the-counter medications. In this literature review, we mention drugs that are being used in the treatment of acute migraine and their level of evidence recommended by the U.S. Headache Consortium. This article gives special emphasis to pharmacokinetics and clinical characteristics of all available triptans. Drug Dev Res 68:441,448, 2007. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Contemporary Models of Youth Development and Problem Prevention: Toward an Integration of Terms, Concepts, and ModelsFAMILY RELATIONS, Issue 1 2004Stephen Small Over the past several years, increased interest in preventing youth problems and promoting healthy youth development has led youth and family practitioners, policy makers, and researchers to develop a wide range of approaches based on various theoretical frameworks. Although the growth in guiding frameworks has led to more complex models and a greater diversity in the options available to scholars and practitioners, the lack of an integrative conceptual scheme and consistent terminology has led to some confusion in the field. Here, we provide an overview of three approaches to youth development and problem prevention, critically examine their strengths and weaknesses, and offer some elaborations to help clarify, extend, and integrate the models. We conclude by discussing some general implications for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. [source] Cardiac Risk Factors and the Use of Triptans: A Survey StudyHEADACHE, Issue 7 2000William B. Young MD Objective.,To describe current practice in triptan use. Background.,Triptans are effective migraine treatments that cause chest symptoms in some patients. True cardiac ischemia is rare. Design.,Headache specialists and family practitioners completed questionnaires regarding the times when triptans are contraindicated, obtaining electrocardiograms (ECGs), and giving the first dose in the office. Results.,Sixty-five headache specialists and 67 family practitioners responded. Headache specialists saw an average of 36.3 patients with headache per week. Family practitioners saw an average of 7.2. Family practitioners and headache specialists had similar opinions regarding the age at which triptans were contraindicated with various numbers of risk factors. Sixty-one percent of headache specialists and 50% of family practitioners would not use a triptan at any age for patients with more than three risk factors (P = NS). Ten percent of headache specialists obtained an ECG for all patients being prescribed triptans, while no family practitioners did (P = .008). Ten percent of both family practitioners and headache specialists never obtained an ECG, even with multiple cardiac risk factors. Headache specialists obtained ECGs more often than family practitioners (P < .002 for one to three risk factors). Family practitioners were more likely to give the first dose of the triptan in the office regardless of cardiovascular risk (58% versus 20%, P < .001). Forty-five percent of headache specialists and 2% of family practitioners never gave the first dose in the office (P < .001). Family practitioners gave the first dose in the office more readily than headache specialists in patients with no risk factors (P = .001), but not for one or more risk factors. Conclusions.,No consensus exists among family practitioners or headache specialists about when to avoid using a triptan due to excessive cardiac risk factors, when to obtain an ECG prior to using a triptan, and when to give the first dose of a triptan in the office. Headache specialists are more likely to obtain ECGs, whereas family practitioners are more likely to give the first dose of a triptan in the office. [source] Curing dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by training motor co-ordination: Miracle or myth?JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, Issue 10 2007Dorothy VM Bishop Abstract: Dore Achievement Centres are springing up world-wide with a mission to cure cerebellar developmental delay, thought to be the cause of dyslexia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyspraxia and Asperger's syndrome. Remarkable success is claimed for an exercise-based treatment that is designed to accelerate cerebellar development. Unfortunately, the published studies are seriously flawed. On measures where control data are available, there is no credible evidence of significant gains in literacy associated with this intervention. There are no published studies on efficacy with the clinical groups for whom the programme is advocated. It is important that family practitioners and paediatricians are aware that the claims made for this expensive treatment are misleading. [source] Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary careALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 10 2009R. JONES Summary Background, Accurate diagnosis and effective management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be challenging for clinicians and other health care professionals. Aim, To develop a patient-centred, self-assessment questionnaire to assist health care professionals in the diagnosis and effective management of patients with GERD. Methods, Questions from patient-reported GERD instruments, previously documented in terms of content validity and psychometric properties (RDQ, GSRS and GIS) and data on the diagnosis of GERD in primary and secondary care were used in the formal development of a diagnostic and management tool, the GerdQ, involving psychometric validation and piloting in patient focus groups. Results, Analyses of data from over 300 primary care patients, moderated by patient input from qualitative interviews, were used to select specific items from the existing instruments to create a new six-item diagnostic and management tool (GerdQ). ROC analysis indicated a sensitivity for GerdQ of 65% and a specificity of 71% for the diagnosis of GERD, similar to that achieved by gastroenterologists. Conclusion, The GerdQ is a potentially useful tool for family practitioners and other health care professionals in diagnosing and managing GERD without initial specialist referral or endoscopy. [source] Physician-patient encounters: The structure of performance in family and general office practiceTHE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue 4 2006Elizabeth F. Wenghofer PhD Abstract Introduction: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the regulatory authority for physicians in Ontario, Canada, conducts peer assessments of physicians' practices as part of a broad quality assurance program. Outcomes are summarized as a single score and there is no differentiation between performance in various aspects of care. In this study we test the hypothesis that physician performance is multidimensional and that dimensions can be defined in terms of physician-patient encounters. Methods: Peer assessment data from 532 randomly selected family practitioners were analyzed using factor analysis to assess the dimensional structure of performance. Content validity was confirmed through consultation sessions with 130 physicians. Multiple-item measures were constructed for each dimension and reliability calculated. Analysis of variance determined the extent to which multiple-item measure scores would vary across peer assessment outcomes. Results: Six performance dimensions were confirmed: acute care, chronic conditions, continuity of care and referrals, well care and health maintenance, psychosocial care, and patient records. Discussion: Physician performance is multidimensional, including types of physician-patient encounters and variation across dimensions, as demonstrated by individual practice. A conceptual framework for multidimensional performance may inform the design of meaningful evaluation and educational recommendations to meet the individual performance of practicing physicians. [source] Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: Introducing education into regulatory assessmentTHE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue 3 2006Elizabeth F. Wenghofer PhD Abstract Introduction: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario developed an enhanced peer assessment (EPA), the goal of which was to provide participating physicians educational value by helping them identify specific learning needs and aligning the assessment process with the principles of continuing education and professional development. In this article, we examine the educational value of the EPA and whether physicians will change their practice as a result of the recommendations received during the assessment. Methods: A group of 41 randomly selected physicians (23 general or family practitioners, 7 obstetrician-gynecologists, and 11 general surgeons) agreed to participate in the EPA pilot. Nine experienced peer assessors were trained in the principles of knowledge translation and the use of practice resources (tool kits) and clinical practice guidelines. The EPA was evaluated through the use of a postassessment questionnaire and focus groups. Results: The physicians felt that the EPA was fair and educationally valuable. Most focus group participants indicated that they implemented recommendations made by the assessor and made changes to some aspect of their practice. The physicians' suggestions for improvement included expanding the assessment beyond the current medical record review and interview format (eg, to include multisource feedback), having assessments occur at regular intervals (eg, every 5 to 10 years), and improving the administrative process by which physicians apply for educational credit for EPA activities. Conclusions: The EPA pilot study has demonstrated that providing detailed individualized feedback and optimizing the one-to-one interaction between assessors and physicians is a promising method for changing physician behavior. The college has started the process of aligning all its peer assessments with the principles of continuing professional development outlined in the EPA model. [source] Where is the evidence that rural exposure increases uptake of rural medical practice?AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, Issue 5 2007Geetha Ranmuthugala Abstract Australian Government initiatives to address medical workforce shortages in rural Australia include increasing the intake of students of rural background and increasing exposure to rural medicine during training. Rural-orientated medical training programs in the USA that selectively admit students from rural backgrounds and who intend to practise as family practitioners have demonstrated success in increasing uptake of practice in rural/underserved areas. However, in examining the specific contribution of rural exposure towards increasing uptake of rural practice, the evidence is inconclusive, largely due to the failure to adjust for these critical independent predictors of rural practice. This paper identifies this evidence gap, examines the concept of rural exposure, and highlights the need to identify which aspects of rural exposure contribute to a positive attitude towards rural practice, thereby influencing students to return to rural areas. The cost of rural exposure through student placements is not insignificant, and there is a need to identify which aspects are most effective in increasing the uptake of rural practice, thereby helping to address the medical workforce shortage experienced in rural Australia. [source] |