Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Fasciocutaneous Flaps (fasciocutaneou + flap)
Selected AbstractsReliability of free-flap coverage in diabetic foot ulcersMICROSURGERY, Issue 2 2005Ömer Özkan M.D. As microsurgery advances, microsurgical free-tissue transfers have become the reconstructive method of choice over staged or primary amputation, and enabling independent ambulation in difficult lower-extremity wounds. In this report, we present our experiences with free-tissue transfer for the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in 13 diabetic foot ulcers. Following radical debridement, soft-tissue reconstruction was achieved in the following ways: anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap in 5 patients, radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap in 3 patients, lateral arm fasciocutaneous flap in 1 patient, gracilis musculocutaneous flap in 1 patient, tensor fascia latae flap in 1 patient, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in 1 patient, and a parascapular flap in the remaining patient. In 8 cases, diabetic wounds were in the foot, while wounds were at the level of the lower leg in the remaining patients. In all patients, vascular patency was confirmed by the Doppler technique. In suspicious cases, arteriography was then performed. While all flaps survived well in the postoperative period, one patient died from cardiopulmonary problems on postoperative day 16 in an intensive care unit. Amputation was necessary in the early postoperative period because of healing problems. In the remaining 10 cases, all flaps survived intact. In one case, arterial revision was performed successfully. The ultimate limb salvage rate was 83% for the 12 patients. Independent ambulation was achieved in these cases. During the follow-up period of 8 months to 2 years, no ulcer recurrence was noted, and no revascularization or vascular bypass surgery was needed before or after the free-tissue transfers. The authors conclude that free-tissue transfer for diabetic foot ulcers is a reliable procedure, despite pessimistic opinions regarding the flap survival and low limb salvage rates. It should be considered a useful reconstructive option for serious defects in well-selected cases. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 25:107,112, 2005. [source] Reconstruction of the Through-and-Through Anterior Mandibulectomy Defect: Indications and Limitations of the Double-Skin Paddle Fibular Free Flap,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 8 2008Frederic W.-B. Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis: The purpose of this report is to describe our recent experience using a double-skin paddle fibular free flap (DSPFFF) for reconstruction of the through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defect and to present a reconstructive algorithm based on the extent of lip and mental skin resection. Study Design: Retrospective review of 10 consecutive patients with through-and-through anterior mandibulectomy defects. Methods: Outcomes that were examined included methods of reconstruction based on the cutaneous defect, flap complications, fistula rate, and donor site complications. Results: Seven patients were reconstructed with a DSPFFF. For lip reconstruction, two patients were also concomitantly reconstructed with Karapandzic or lip advancement flaps. Three patients were reconstructed with both a fibular free flap and a second free flap (1 radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap and 2 anterolateral thigh flaps). The transverse dimensions of the DSPFFFs were as great as 15 cm. None of the patients developed a fistula. All free tissue transfers were successful. One patient developed partial loss of the fibular skin paddle used for submental skin replacement. Conclusions: DSPFFF is a safe and reliable way to reconstruct an anterior through-and-through mandibular defect. Indications for using a DSPFFF are 1) a cutaneous defect that lies at or below the plane of the reconstructed mandible, 2) a transverse width of the oral mucosa and cutaneous defect that does not exceed 15 cm (the approximate distance from the mid-calf to the anterior midline), and 3) a lip defect that, if present, can be reconstructed with local flaps. [source] Reconstruction of foot defects with free lateral arm fasciocutaneous flaps: Analysis of fifty patientsMICROSURGERY, Issue 8 2005Betul Gozel Ulusal M.D. In this article, long-term outcomes of foot reconstruction with free lateral arm fasciocutaneous flaps were retrospectively analyzed in 50 patients. The patients, 38 men and 12 women, ranged in age from 7,73 years (mean, 43.5 years). Indications for surgery included trauma (32 patients), diabetes mellitus (7 patients), burns (7 patients), chronic ulcers (3 patients), and tumor (1 patient). The locations of defects were the dorsum (n = 21), ankle (n = 12), medial (n = 6), lateral (n = 6), posterior heel (n = 2), and distal sole (n = 3) Concomitant bone injury occurred in 5 cases, and the weight-bearing surface of the foot was involved in 5 patients. Defects ranged in size from 27,76 cm2 (mean, 36.4 cm2). Successful reconstructions were accomplished in 46 cases (92%). Flap complications included total flap loss and below-knee amputation (1 patient) and partial flap loss (3 patients); 75% (3/4) of these cases had diabetes as a comorbid factor, and 25% (1/4) had a concomitant bone injury. Six patients with dorsum defects required debulking of the flap (11.1%). None of the patients required modified shoes. In the majority of cases, flaps provided stable coverage and a gain in protective deep-pressure sensation. In long-term follow-up (up to 4 years), patients regained their ambulation, free of pain. Even in weight-bearing areas, none of the cases experienced ulceration or skin breakdown. Free lateral arm flaps provided excellent durability, with solid bony union and successful restoration of the contour of the foot in moderate-sized foot defects. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 25:581,588, 2005. [source] Etiology of Late Free Flap Failures Occurring After Hospital Discharge,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 11 2007Mark K. Wax MD Abstract Objectives: Vascular compromise of free flaps most commonly occurs in the immediate postoperative period in association with failure of the microvascular anastomosis. Rarely do flaps fail in the late postoperative period. It is not well understood why free flaps can fail after 7 postoperative days. We undertook a case review series to assess possible causes of late free flap failure. Study Design: Retrospective review at two tertiary referral centers: Oregon Health Sciences University and University of Alabama at Birmingham. Methods: A review of 1,530 flaps performed in 1,592 patients between 1998 and 2006 were evaluated to identify late flap failure. Late flap failure was defined as failure occurring after postoperative day 7 or on follow-up visits after hospital discharge. A prospective database with the following variables was examined: age, medical comorbidities, postreconstructive complications (fistula or infection), hematoma, seroma, previous surgery, radiation therapy, intraoperative findings at the time of debridement, nutrition, and, possibly, etiologies. Results: A total of 13 patients with late graft failure were identified in this study population of 1,530 (less than 1%) flaps; 6 radial forearm fasciocutaneous flaps, 2 rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, 4 fibular flaps, and 1 latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap underwent late failure. The time to necrosis was a median of 21 (range, 7,90) days. Etiology was believed to possibly be pressure on the pedicle in the postoperative period in four patients (no sign of local wound issues at the pedicle), infection (abscess formation) in three patients, and regrowth of residual tumor in six patients. Loss occurring within 1 month was more common in radial forearm flaps and was presented in the context of a normal appearing wound at the anastomotic site, as opposed to loss occurring after 1 month, which happened more commonly in fibula flaps secondary to recurrence. Conclusion: Although late free flap failure is rare, local factors such as infection and possibly pressure on the pedicle can be contributing factors. Patients presenting with late flap failure should be evaluated for residual tumor growth. [source] A comparison of one-stage procedures for post-traumatic urethral stricture repairBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 9 2005Andreas P. Berger OBJECTIVE To compare the results and complication rates of various one-stage treatments for repairing a post-traumatic urethral stricture. PATIENTS AND METHODS The medical records of 153 patients who had a post-traumatic urethral stricture repaired between 1977 and 2003 were evaluated retrospectively, and analysed for the different types of urethral reconstruction. RESULTS The procedures included direct end-to-end anastomosis in 86 (56%) patients, free dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using preputial or inguinal skin in 40 (26%), ventral onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa in seven (5%) and ventral fasciocutaneous flaps on a vascular pedicle in 20 (13%). At a mean (median, range) follow-up of 75.2 (38, 12,322) months, 121 (79%) patients had no evidence of recurrent stricture, while in 32 men (21%) they were detected at a mean follow-up of 30.47 (1,96) months. Patients having a dorsal onlay urethroplasty had the longest strictures. The re-stricture rate was lowest after a dorsal onlay urethroplasty (5% vs 27% when treated with end-to-end anastomosis, 15% after fasciocutaneous flaps and 57% after a ventral buccal mucosal graft). The surgical technique used had no effect on postoperative incontinence or erectile dysfunction rates. CONCLUSION In patients with strictures which are too long to be excised and re-anastomosed, tension-free dorsal onlay urethroplasty is better than ventral graft or flap techniques. In patients with short urethral strictures direct end-to-end anastomosis remains an option for the one-stage repair of urethral stricture. [source] | ||||||||||