Home  About us  Contact
 

Exit Block (exit + block)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Prevalence and significance of Exit Block During Arrhythmias Arising in Pulmonary Veins

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2000
HUNG-FAT TSE M.D.
Exit Block. Introduction: Recent studies described the occurrence of conduction block within pulmonary veins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of exit block during arrhythmias that arise in pulmonary veins. Methods and Results: Twenty-five patients with atrial tachycardia/fibrillation underwent successful ablation of 28 arrhythmogenic foci within a pulmonary vein. The prevalence of exit block in the pulmonary veins was determined in 28 arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins and 40 nonarrhythmogenic pulmonary veins. During isolated premature depolarizations, exit block in a pulmonary vein was observed at 50% of arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein sites and was never observed within pulmonary veins that did not generate a tachycardia (P < 0.01). During tachycardia, exit block from a pulmonary vein was observed in 61% of the arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins. The mean cycle length of the pulmonary vein tachycardias associated with exit block was significantly shorter than the cycle length of tachycardia that were not associated with exit block (163 ± 32 vs 251 ± 45 msec, P < 0.001), Exit block in two pulmonary veins during the same episode of tachycardia was observed in 3 of the 28 arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins (11%) in three different patients. Simultaneous recordings in the two pulmonary veins demonstrated bursts of tachycardia in both veins that were not synchronized. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic site in one of the pulmonary veins eliminated spontaneous recurrences of tachycardia from the other pulmonary vein. Conclusion: Exit block from pulmonary veins is a common observation during tachycardias generated within pulmonary veins and indicates that an arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein has been identified. The occurrence of exit block in more than one pulmonary vein most likely is attributable to simultaneous tachycardias, one or both of which may be tachycardia induced and perpetuated by the other. [source]

Ectopic Atrial Rhythm with Exit Block Following Catheter Ablation for Focal Atrial Tachycardias in a Patient with Prior Surgery for Atrial Septal Defect

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2002
KIMIE OHKUBO
OHKUBO, K., et al.: Ectopic Atrial Rhythm with Exit Block Following Catheter Ablation for Focal Atrial Tachycardias in a Patient with Prior Surgery for Atrial Septal Defect. The patient was a 40-year-old woman with a history of surgery for atrial septal defect and catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter. An electrophysiological study was performed because she had palpitation and syncope. She had ectopic atrial rhythm originating from low lateral RA. Two focal atrial tachycardias ([1] superior vena cava-RA junction and [2] a low posteroseptal RA) were successfully ablated. Following catheter ablation for the second atrial tachycardia, she developed junctional rhythm because ectopic atrial rhythm showed exit block. However, atrial activation of junctional rhythm could conduct into the ectopic atrial rhythm focus and reset the rhythm when atrial activation of junctional rhythm reached the blocked line after atrial refractoriness by preceding ectopic atrial rhythm. [source]

Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001
CHRÍSTOPHE MELZER
MELZER, C., et al.: Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax. This case report describes a transient pacemaker exit block due to subcutaneous emphysema following pneumothorax. Pneumothorax after pacemaker implantation is rare, but development of subcutaneous emphysema under such circumstances is even more uncommon. Exit block develops only with the use of unipolar leads; with implantation of bipolar leads, this complication cannot occur. [source]

Prevalence and significance of Exit Block During Arrhythmias Arising in Pulmonary Veins

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2000
HUNG-FAT TSE M.D.
Exit Block. Introduction: Recent studies described the occurrence of conduction block within pulmonary veins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of exit block during arrhythmias that arise in pulmonary veins. Methods and Results: Twenty-five patients with atrial tachycardia/fibrillation underwent successful ablation of 28 arrhythmogenic foci within a pulmonary vein. The prevalence of exit block in the pulmonary veins was determined in 28 arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins and 40 nonarrhythmogenic pulmonary veins. During isolated premature depolarizations, exit block in a pulmonary vein was observed at 50% of arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein sites and was never observed within pulmonary veins that did not generate a tachycardia (P < 0.01). During tachycardia, exit block from a pulmonary vein was observed in 61% of the arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins. The mean cycle length of the pulmonary vein tachycardias associated with exit block was significantly shorter than the cycle length of tachycardia that were not associated with exit block (163 ± 32 vs 251 ± 45 msec, P < 0.001), Exit block in two pulmonary veins during the same episode of tachycardia was observed in 3 of the 28 arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins (11%) in three different patients. Simultaneous recordings in the two pulmonary veins demonstrated bursts of tachycardia in both veins that were not synchronized. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic site in one of the pulmonary veins eliminated spontaneous recurrences of tachycardia from the other pulmonary vein. Conclusion: Exit block from pulmonary veins is a common observation during tachycardias generated within pulmonary veins and indicates that an arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein has been identified. The occurrence of exit block in more than one pulmonary vein most likely is attributable to simultaneous tachycardias, one or both of which may be tachycardia induced and perpetuated by the other. [source]

Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001
CHRÍSTOPHE MELZER
MELZER, C., et al.: Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax. This case report describes a transient pacemaker exit block due to subcutaneous emphysema following pneumothorax. Pneumothorax after pacemaker implantation is rare, but development of subcutaneous emphysema under such circumstances is even more uncommon. Exit block develops only with the use of unipolar leads; with implantation of bipolar leads, this complication cannot occur. [source]

Prevalence and significance of Exit Block During Arrhythmias Arising in Pulmonary Veins

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2000
HUNG-FAT TSE M.D.
Exit Block. Introduction: Recent studies described the occurrence of conduction block within pulmonary veins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of exit block during arrhythmias that arise in pulmonary veins. Methods and Results: Twenty-five patients with atrial tachycardia/fibrillation underwent successful ablation of 28 arrhythmogenic foci within a pulmonary vein. The prevalence of exit block in the pulmonary veins was determined in 28 arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins and 40 nonarrhythmogenic pulmonary veins. During isolated premature depolarizations, exit block in a pulmonary vein was observed at 50% of arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein sites and was never observed within pulmonary veins that did not generate a tachycardia (P < 0.01). During tachycardia, exit block from a pulmonary vein was observed in 61% of the arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins. The mean cycle length of the pulmonary vein tachycardias associated with exit block was significantly shorter than the cycle length of tachycardia that were not associated with exit block (163 ± 32 vs 251 ± 45 msec, P < 0.001), Exit block in two pulmonary veins during the same episode of tachycardia was observed in 3 of the 28 arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins (11%) in three different patients. Simultaneous recordings in the two pulmonary veins demonstrated bursts of tachycardia in both veins that were not synchronized. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic site in one of the pulmonary veins eliminated spontaneous recurrences of tachycardia from the other pulmonary vein. Conclusion: Exit block from pulmonary veins is a common observation during tachycardias generated within pulmonary veins and indicates that an arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein has been identified. The occurrence of exit block in more than one pulmonary vein most likely is attributable to simultaneous tachycardias, one or both of which may be tachycardia induced and perpetuated by the other. [source]

Cardiac Pacing: Memories of a Bygone Era

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 9 2008
HARRY G. MOND M.D.
The first cardiac pacemaker implants occurred in the late 1950s and involved insertion of epicardial or epimyocardial leads and abdominal pulse generators. By the mid 1960s, cardiologists were making attempts to insert transvenous leads into the right ventricle. These early unipolar leads had large, polished, high polarization electrodes, no fixation device, and no lumen in which to place a stylet for lead positioning. The lead implantation procedures were usually long and the irradiation to both patient and operator excessive. Pulse generators were powered by zinc-mercury cells, which were large, unreliable, and prone to sudden output failure. Postoperative complications such as lead dislodgement, exit block, and premature power source failure were very common with most patients requiring further surgery within a year. Little has been written of this period and in particular the experiences of the operators, such that today's pacemaker implanters have virtually no knowledge of this bygone era. This historical report by four Australian cardiologists details the operative procedures and follow-up management of those original pacemaker recipients. [source]

Ectopic Atrial Rhythm with Exit Block Following Catheter Ablation for Focal Atrial Tachycardias in a Patient with Prior Surgery for Atrial Septal Defect

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2002
KIMIE OHKUBO
OHKUBO, K., et al.: Ectopic Atrial Rhythm with Exit Block Following Catheter Ablation for Focal Atrial Tachycardias in a Patient with Prior Surgery for Atrial Septal Defect. The patient was a 40-year-old woman with a history of surgery for atrial septal defect and catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter. An electrophysiological study was performed because she had palpitation and syncope. She had ectopic atrial rhythm originating from low lateral RA. Two focal atrial tachycardias ([1] superior vena cava-RA junction and [2] a low posteroseptal RA) were successfully ablated. Following catheter ablation for the second atrial tachycardia, she developed junctional rhythm because ectopic atrial rhythm showed exit block. However, atrial activation of junctional rhythm could conduct into the ectopic atrial rhythm focus and reset the rhythm when atrial activation of junctional rhythm reached the blocked line after atrial refractoriness by preceding ectopic atrial rhythm. [source]

Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5 2001
CHRÍSTOPHE MELZER
MELZER, C., et al.: Transient Exit Block of a DDD Pacemaker with Unipolar Leads in Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Pneumothorax. This case report describes a transient pacemaker exit block due to subcutaneous emphysema following pneumothorax. Pneumothorax after pacemaker implantation is rare, but development of subcutaneous emphysema under such circumstances is even more uncommon. Exit block develops only with the use of unipolar leads; with implantation of bipolar leads, this complication cannot occur. [source]

Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2001
RAINER GRADAUS
GRADAUS, R., et al.: Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead. Dual-chamber ICDs are increasingly used to avoid inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachycardias. Additionally, many ICD patients will probably benefit from dual chamber pacing. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraoperative performance and short-term follow-up of an innovative single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and ventricle. Implantation of this single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead was successful in all 13 patients (age 63 ± 8 years; LVEF 0.44 ± 0.16; New York Heart Association [NYHA] 2.4 ± 0.4, previous open heart surgery in all patients). The operation time was 79 ± 29 minutes, the fluoroscopy time 4.7 ± 3.1 minutes. No perioperative complications occurred. The intraoperative atrial sensing was 1.7 ± 0.5 mV, the atrial pacing threshold product was 0.20 ± 0.14 V/ms (range 0.03,0.50 V/ms). The defibrillation threshold was 8.8 ± 2.7 J. At prehospital discharge and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, atrial sensing was 1.9 ± 0.9, 2.1 ± 0.5, and 2.7 ± 0.6 mV, respectively, (P = NS, P < 0.05, P < 0.05 to implant, respectively), the mean atrial threshold product 0.79, 1.65, and 1.29 V/ms, respectively. In two patients, an intermittent exit block occurred in different body postures. All spontaneous and induced ventricular arrhythmias were detected and terminated appropriately. Thus, in a highly selected patient group, atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing with a single lead is possible under consideration of an atrial pacing dysfunction in 17% of patients. [source]

Permanent Pacemaker Therapy Before and After the Reunification of Germany: 16 Years of Experience at an East German Regional Pacing Center

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2000
P. KARNATZ
The reunification of Germany had a significant influence on the management of patients with bradyarrhythmias. The current study was performed in a regional pacing center heated in the former German Democratic Republic. It compares the situation of patients with critical bradyarrhythmias before and after the reunification of Germany in 1990 focusing on (1) indication for pacemaker implantation. (2) pacemaker modalities and function, (3) type of leads, (4) frequency of reintervention, and (5) early and late complications. The study covers 9 years before and 7 years after the reunification. A total of 1,125 patients were included, and the database was formed by the patients' files and the protocols of implantation. The situation before reunification was characterized by a nonavailability of modern physiological pacing devices and insufficient diagnostic equipment. Between 1981 and 1990, 384 patients underwent pacemaker implantation solely receiving single chamber devices with no or only minimal feasibility of programming. Between 1990 and 1996, 741 patients were treated, and they all received modern pacemakers having the capability of multiprogramming and telemetry. Regarding complications of pacemaker therapy, lead related problems significantly decreased after the reunification (dislocation, 5.3% vs 1.7%, P < 0.05; exit block, 6.7% vs 1.4%. P < 0.05) opposite to pacemaker infections, which significantly increasing after dual chamber pacemakers were implanted (2.2% vs 6.0%, P < 0.05). The reunification of Germany dramatically improved the situation of patients with critical bradyarrhythmias leading to free access to high-tech pacing equipment within a few months. However, the abrupt change from antiquated to modern pacemaker therapy created some new problems, especially regarding application and handling of modern physiological pacing devices. [source]