Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Evaluation Framework (evaluation + framework)
Selected AbstractsEvaluation of Continuing Professional Education: Toward a Theory of Our OwnNEW DIRECTIONS FOR ADULT & CONTINUING EDUCATION, Issue 86 2000Judith M. Ottoson Program evaluation theory seeks to make the evaluation of continuing professional education a transparent process. This chapter introduces the Situated Evaluation Framework, which situates the learner and knowledge assessment at the junction of the educational context, the practice context, and the evaluation context. [source] Environmental conflict resolution: Evaluating performance outcomes and contributing factorsCONFLICT RESOLUTION QUARTERLY, Issue 1 2009Kirk Emerson This empirical study of fifty-two environmental conflict resolution (ECR) processes is based on an evaluation framework that specifies key conditions and factors that contribute to ECR outcomes. Data were collected on a range of ECR processes and applications. This article reports on findings from a multilevel modeling analysis that focuses on three primary outcomes: reaching agreement, the quality of agreement, and improved working relationships among parties. Effective engagement of parties is identified as a major contributor to all three outcomes. Other key factors that operate directly and indirectly through effective engagement are involvement of appropriate parties, the skills and practices of ECR mediators and facilitators, and incorporation of relevant and high-quality information. Findings generally support the ECR evaluation framework. [source] Framing participation with multicriterion evaluations to support the management of complex environmental issuesENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, Issue 2 2010Katrine Soma Abstract A repeated statement observed in the literature is that stakeholder participation can contribute to improve complex environmental management decisions. However, transparent and legitimate decision-making processes cannot be ensured without suitable involvement strategies and information treatments throughout the processes. The main goal in this study is to frame participatory processes with multicriterion evaluations to increase transparency of the decision support. The developed approach applies clearly defined roles of interest groups, experts and citizens, as well as alternatives presented on maps, criteria arranged in a hierarchy of decision elements and weights obtained by conducting deliberative processes with citizens. The approach is applied in a case study at municipal level in Norway to support coastal zone management decisions. Relevant interests and social values are systematically represented by the multicriterion evaluation framework utilized in the approach presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. [source] Capital Assistance for Small Firms: Some Implications for Regional Economic WelfareGEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, Issue 1 2000Daniel Felsenstein This paper analyzes the role of finance capital in regional economic development. A cost-benefit approach is invoked in order to estimate the welfare impacts of a regional loan and guarantee program for small firms in Israel. Program-created employment is treated as a benefit and an employment account that separates net from gross employment, is presented. An estimate of net wage benefits is then derived. This involves adjusting wages across different earnings classes in order to account for the variation in opportunity costs of labor at different levels. The estimation of costs includes the opportunity costs of capital, administration, default, and tax-raising costs. Results point to substantial regional welfare effects. We stress the need to account for changing regional economic structure in this kind of evaluation framework. [source] St. Thomas University: Which Balanced Scorecard to Use?,/ST.ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, Issue 4 2007THOMAS UNIVERSITY: LE CHOIX D'UN TABLEAU DE BORD ABSTRACT This case provides background on a university that undertook a formal strategic-planning initiative. Mary White, Vice-President (Administration), was responsible for developing the performance evaluation framework. She established a special task force, which included Peter Crimson, Assistant Vice-President (Administration), Eva Black, Director of Financial Analysis, and Adam Green, Director of Planning and Analysis, to assist her in this endeavor. The special task force had an insightful discussion on the balanced scorecard during its first meeting. When the meeting concluded, Mary White asked Adam Green to conduct research on the different approaches to the balanced scorecard adopted in a number of universities. She expected Adam Green to provide an analysis of the different balanced scorecard approaches in universities, to make recommendations on the balanced scorecard approach that St. Thomas should adopt, and to develop a balanced scorecard for the university. An objective of the case is to provide students with an opportunity to evaluate the implementation of the balanced scorecard in universities, to recommend an approach for developing the performance evaluation framework, and to design a balanced scorecard for the university. RÉSUMÉ Le cas élaboré par l'auteure contient les données de base relatives au projet structuré de planification stratégique entrepris par une université. Mary White, vice-présidente à l'administration, assumait la responsabilité de l'élaboration du cadre d'évaluation de la performance. Elle a constitué un groupe de travail spécial, réunissant Peter Crimson, adjoint à la vice-présidente à l'administration, Eva Black, directrice de l'analyse financière, et Adam Green, directeur de la planification et de l'analyse, pour lui prêter main-forte dans cette entreprise. Lors de sa première réunion, le groupe de travail spécial a tenu une discussion instructive sur le tableau de bord. Au terme de cette réunion, Mary White a demandé à Adam Green de faire des recherches sur la façon dont différentes universités ont choisi de traiter le tableau de bord. Elle souhaitait obtenir une analyse des différentes méthodes utilisées dans les universités, des recommandations quant au choix de la méthode appropriée à St. Thomas et l'élaboration du tableau de bord de l'université. Ce cas a notamment pour objectif d'offrir aux étudiants l'occasion d'évaluer la mise en application du tableau de bord dans les universités, de recommander une méthode d'élaboration du cadre d'évaluation de la performance et de concevoir un tableau de bord pour l'université. [source] Multi-factors oriented study of P2P ChurnINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, Issue 9 2009Dong Yang Abstract The dynamics of peers, namely Churn, is an inherent property of peer-to-peer (P2P) systems and is critical to their design and evaluation. Although every excellent P2P protocol has some solution to this issue, studies on Churn are still seldom. This paper studies various factors related to Churn, and uses them to analyze and evaluate P2P protocols. Prior researches on Churn are all based on the P2P network factors in Churn environment, and their difference is whether to use these factors as predecessor references to build Churn analytical models or as successor references to test the models. According to this difference, this paper first divides various factors into two categories: impacting Churn and affected by Churn. There is a causal relationship between these two categories. Factors impacting Churn are cause, and the factors affected by Churn are effect. In this paper, we use this causality to simulate and analyze P2P Churn. Cause is used as the input data and effect is used as the output result. Second, based on the classification of Churn factors, we present a performance evaluation framework and two comparing models. Based on the framework and models, we simulate and analyze three P2P protocols and get some useful results such as the performance of these protocols under Churn, the advantage of Chord over others, and the most important factors impacting Churn. Finally, we present a method to improve recent P2P Churn models by adding some influence factors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Developing person-centred practice: nursing outcomes arising from changes to the care environment in residential settings for older peopleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OLDER PEOPLE NURSING, Issue 2 2010BSc (Hons) Nursing, Brendan McCormack D.Phil (Oxon), PGCEA mccormack b., dewing j., breslin l., coyne-nevin a., kennedy k., manning m., peelo-kilroe l., tobin c. & slater p. (2010) Developing person-centred practice: nursing outcomes arising from changes to the care environment in residential settings for older people. International Journal of Older People Nursing 5, 93,107 Aim., To present the nursing outcomes from the evaluation of developments in the care environment in residential settings for older people. Design., The evaluation data reported here is derived from a larger national programme of work that focused on the development of person-centred practice in residential services for older people using an emancipatory practice development framework. A multi-method evaluation framework was utilised. Outcome data were collected at three time points between December 2007 and September 2009. The data reported here were collected using an instrument called the ,Person-Centred Nursing Index'. Findings., Heavy workload was the main cause of stress among nurses. Personal and professional satisfaction with the job was scored highest by the total sample of nurses. Nineteen factors were examined using the Person-Centred Nursing Index. Statistically significant changes were observed in 12 of these. In addition, there were statistically significant changes in nurses' perceptions of caring, indicating a shift from a dominant focus on ,technical' aspects of care, to one where ,intimate' aspects of care were more highly valued. Relevance to clinical practice., The findings highlight the importance of the development of effective teamwork, workload management, time management and staff relationships in order to create a culture where there is a more democratic and inclusive approach to practice and space for the formation of person-centred relationships. [source] A model for evaluating the effectiveness of middle managers' training courses: evidence from a major banking organization in GreeceINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, Issue 4 2009Ekaterini Galanou Contemporary management thinking embraces the organizational training theory that sustainable success rests, to a great extent, upon a systematic evaluation of training interventions. However, the evidence indicates that few organizations take adequate steps to assess and analyse the quality and outcomes of their training. The authors seek to develop the existing literature on training evaluation by proposing a new model, specific to management training, which might encourage more and better evaluation by practitioners. Their thesis is that training evaluation is best if it can be based on criteria derived from the objectives of the training and they draw on the management effectiveness literature to inform their proposed model. The study seeks to examine the effect of six evaluation levels , reactions, learning, job behaviour, job performance, organizational team performance and some wider, societal effects , in measuring training interventions with regard to the alterations to learning, transfer and organizational impact. The model was tested with data obtained from 190 middle managers employed by a large banking organization in Greece and the results suggest that there is considerable consistency in the evaluation framework specified. The paper discusses these results and draws conclusions about their practical implications. The study's limitations are considered and some future research needs identified. [source] Towards effective evaluation of digital community information systemsPROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (ELECTRONIC), Issue 1 2002Kenton T. Unruh Digital Community Information Systems (CIS) are increasing in both size and scale. These systems help people obtain community information (CI) for the myriad situations that arise in everyday life. As these systems migrate to the online environment, increasing complexities and scale provide the impetus for improvements in system design. System re-design, however, relies on the effective evaluation of digital CIS. Despite the plethora of evaluation frameworks from the systems, organizational, and information retrieval fields, minimal research has directly addressed the issue of digital CIS evaluation. Following a selective review of digital CIS and evaluation approaches, a layered evaluation framework is proposed to guide the evaluation of digital CIS. [source] The value of a ,failed' R&D project: an emerging evaluation framework for building innovative capabilities1R & D MANAGEMENT, Issue 2 2009Maria Elmquist In literature and R&D organizations alike, project success consists in minimizing the deviations from set targets in terms of quality, cost and time. The main management task is to execute and monitor progress to reduce risks , assuming that project attributes are known, necessary resources can be estimated and a reasonable time table can be agreed upon. In such a context, evaluating project success is easy. However, in an innovative context, setting project targets initially is difficult and the contributions of the projects sometimes are of an unexpected nature. This paper investigates if projects can be evaluated in terms of how they contribute to the building of innovative capabilities of the firm instead of independently. Based on a case study at the Régie Autonome des Transports Parisians and the theoretical framework of innovation fields, a framework for evaluating projects from an additional perspective is proposed. Based on the following four criteria: financial resources, the development of a structured, refined and expanded strategic vision, developed competences (with related suppliers) and identification of knowledge gaps (occasionally with related partners for knowledge production), this framework shows how seemingly failed R&D projects can instead be considered as invaluable to the overall innovation process. [source] Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chain: a framework for evaluating radical technology developmentR & D MANAGEMENT, Issue 3 2005Jeremy K. Hall Contemporary frameworks for evaluating technological innovations contend that innovative success is dependent upon the ability of firms to acquire and assimilate new knowledge without disrupting value chain members such as suppliers, customers and complementary innovators. These frameworks, however, provide little advice on how to deal with radical, controversial innovations that may also introduce new undesirable environmental, health, and social side affects. In addition to technological, commercial and organisational uncertainties, the developers of such technology typically must resolve social uncertainties, a particularly difficult activity because of the added complexities and often conflicting and/or difficult-to-reconcile concerns from secondary stakeholders. Attempts must be made to address the potential unintended and unforeseen consequences of the technology, as well as its potential benefits, if it is to be successfully applied. Using Monsanto's development of agricultural biotechnology as an illustration, we suggest an evaluation framework that incorporates stakeholder theory, innovation management concepts and Popper's evolutionary learning methodology of science and its extension to social issues. [source] One of These Things Is Not Like the Others: The Idea of Precedence in Health Technology Assessment and Coverage DecisionsTHE MILBANK QUARTERLY, Issue 2 2005MITA GIACOMINI Health plans often deliberate covering technologies with challenging purposes, effects, or costs. They must integrate quantitative evidence (e.g., how well a technology works) with qualitative, normative assessments (e.g., whether it works well enough for a worthwhile purpose). Arguments from analogy and precedent help integrate these criteria and establish standards for their policy application. Examples of arguments are described for three technologies (ICSI, genetic tests, and Viagra). Drawing lessons from law, ethics, philosophy, and the social sciences, a framework is developed for case-based evaluation of new technologies. The decision-making cycle includes (1) taking stock of past decisions and formulating precedents, (2) deciding new cases, and (3) assimilating decisions into the case history and evaluation framework. Each stage requires distinctive decision maker roles, information, and methods. [source] | ||||||||||||||||