Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
European League (european + league)
Selected AbstractsEvaluation of the efficacy and safety of pamapimod, a p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, in a double-blind, methotrexate-controlled study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis,ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 2 2009Stanley B. Cohen Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of pamapimod (a selective inhibitor of the ,-isoform of p38 MAP kinase) as monotherapy in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) treatment in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. One group received MTX (7.5 mg/week with planned escalation to 20 mg/week), and 3 groups received pamapimod (50, 150, or 300 mg) once daily. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR20 response) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points included ACR50 and ACR70 responses, change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), categorical analyses of DAS28/European League Against Rheumatism response, and change from baseline in each parameter of the ACR core set of measures. Safety monitoring included recording of adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing, immunology assessments, administration of electrocardiograms, and assessment of vital signs. Results Patients assigned to receive MTX and pamapimod had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. At week 12, fewer patients taking pamapimod had an ACR20 response (23%, 18%, and 31% in the 50-, 150-, and 300-mg groups, respectively) compared with patients taking MTX (45%). Secondary efficacy end points showed a similar pattern. AEs were typically characterized as mild and included infections, skin disorders, and dizziness. Pamapimod was generally well tolerated, but the 300-mg dose appeared to be more toxic than either the 2 lower doses or MTX. Conclusion The present results showed that pamapimod was not as effective as MTX in the treatment of active RA. [source] Quality of different chondroitin sulfate preparations in relation to their therapeutic activityJOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY: AN INTERNATI ONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE, Issue 10 2009Prof. Nicola Volpi Abstract Objectives Chondroitin sulfate is currently recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) as a SYSADOA (symptomatic slow acting drug for osteoarthritis) in Europe in the treatment of knee and hand osteoarthritis based on research evidence and meta-analysis of numerous clinical studies. Furthermore, recent clinical trials demonstrated its possible structure-modifying effects. Chondroitin sulfate, alone or in combination with glucosamine or other ingredients, is also utilized as a nutraceutical in dietary supplements in Europe and the USA. However, it is derived from animal sources by extraction and purification processes. As a consequence, source material, manufacturing processes, the presence of contaminants and many other factors contribute to the overall biological and pharmacological actions of these agents. We aim to review the quality control of chondroitin sulfate in pharmaceutical-grade preparations and nutraceuticals. Key findings Pharmaceutical-grade formulations of chondroitin sulfate are of high and standardized quality, purity and properties, due to the stricter regulations to which this drug is subjected by local national health institutes as regards production and characteristics. On the contrary, as several published studies available in literature indicate, the chondroitin sulfate quality of several nutraceuticals is poor. Additionally, there are no definite regulations governing the origin of the ingredients in these nutraceuticals and the origin of the ingredients in natural products is the most important factor ensuring quality, and thus safety and efficacy, in particular for chondroitin sulfate, due to its extraction from different sources. Conclusions Due to the poor chondroitin sulfate quality of some nutraceuticals, we conclude that stricter regulations regarding their quality control should be introduced to guarantee the manufacture of high quality products for nutraceutical utilization and to protect customers from low-quality, ineffective and potentially dangerous products. There is a need for specific and accurate analytical procedures, which should be enforced to confirm purity and label claims both for raw materials and finished chondroitin sulfate products, and also to govern the origin of ingredients. Until these stricter regulations are in place, then it is strongly recommended that pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulfate is used rather than food supplements. [source] 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative,ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2010Daniel Aletaha Objective The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been criticized for their lack of sensitivity in early disease. This work was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for RA. Methods A joint working group from the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism developed, in 3 phases, a new approach to classifying RA. The work focused on identifying, among patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis, factors that best discriminated between those who were and those who were not at high risk for persistent and/or erosive disease,this being the appropriate current paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." Results In the new criteria set, classification as "definite RA" is based on the confirmed presence of synovitis in at least 1 joint, absence of an alternative diagnosis that better explains the synovitis, and achievement of a total score of 6 or greater (of a possible 10) from the individual scores in 4 domains: number and site of involved joints (score range 0,5), serologic abnormality (score range 0,3), elevated acute-phase response (score range 0,1), and symptom duration (2 levels; range 0,1). Conclusion This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features. This will refocus attention on the important need for earlier diagnosis and institution of effective disease-suppressing therapy to prevent or minimize the occurrence of the undesirable sequelae that currently comprise the paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." [source] The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological reportARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2010Tuhina Neogi Objective The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism have developed new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of Phase 2 of the development process was to achieve expert consensus on the clinical and laboratory variables that should contribute to the final criteria set. Methods Twenty-four expert RA clinicians (12 from Europe and 12 from North America) participated in Phase 2. A consensus-based decision analysis approach was used to identify factors (and their relative weights) that influence the probability of "developing RA," complemented by data from the Phase 1 study. Patient case scenarios were used to identify and reach consensus on factors important in determining the probability of RA development. Decision analytic software was used to derive the relative weights for each of the factors and their categories, using choice-based conjoint analysis. Results The expert panel agreed that the new classification criteria should be applied to individuals with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in whom at least 1 joint is deemed by an expert assessor to be swollen, indicating definite synovitis. In this clinical setting, they identified 4 additional criteria as being important: number of joints involved and site of involvement, serologic abnormality, acute-phase response, and duration of symptoms in the involved joints. These criteria were consistent with those identified in the Phase 1 data-driven approach. Conclusion The consensus-based, decision analysis approach used in Phase 2 complemented the Phase 1 efforts. The 4 criteria and their relative weights form the basis of the final criteria set. [source] Ofatumumab, a human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I/II study,ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 8 2010Mikkel Østergaard Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab, a novel human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose disease did not respond to ,1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Methods This combined phase I/II study investigated the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of ofatumumab. In part A (phase I), 39 patients received 2 intravenous (IV) infusions of ofatumumab (300 mg, 700 mg, or 1,000 mg) or placebo in a 4:1 ratio 2 weeks apart, using a specified premedication and infusion regimen. In part B (phase II), 225 patients received study treatment as per phase I in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters. Efficacy was assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement (ACR20), the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. B cell pharmacodynamics were also investigated. Results AEs were predominantly reported at the first infusion and were mostly mild to moderate in intensity. Rapid and sustained peripheral B cell depletion was observed in all dose groups. In phase II, patients in all ofatumumab dose groups had significantly higher ACR20 response rates (40%, 49%, and 44% for the 300 mg, 700 mg, and 1,000 mg doses, respectively) than did patients receiving placebo (11%) at week 24 (P < 0.001). Overall, 70% of patients receiving ofatumumab had a moderate or good response according to the EULAR criteria at week 24. Conclusion Our findings indicate that ofatumumab, administered as 2 IV infusions of doses up to 1,000 mg, is clinically effective in patients with active RA. [source] Rheumatoid arthritis risk allele PTPRC is also associated with response to anti,tumor necrosis factor , therapyARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 7 2010Jing Cui Objective Anti,tumor necrosis factor , (anti-TNF) therapy is a mainstay of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of the present study was to test established RA genetic risk factors to determine whether the same alleles also influence the response to anti-TNF therapy. Methods A total of 1,283 RA patients receiving etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab therapy were studied from among an international collaborative consortium of 9 different RA cohorts. The primary end point compared RA patients with a good treatment response according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria (n = 505) with RA patients considered to be nonresponders (n = 316). The secondary end point was the change from baseline in the level of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (,DAS28). Clinical factors such as age, sex, and concomitant medications were tested as possible correlates of treatment response. Thirty-one single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the risk of RA were genotyped and tested for any association with treatment response, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results Of the 31 RA-associated risk alleles, a SNP at the PTPRC (also known as CD45) gene locus (rs10919563) was associated with the primary end point, a EULAR good response versus no response (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, P = 0.0001 in the multivariate model). Similar results were obtained using the secondary end point, the ,DAS28 (P = 0.0002). There was suggestive evidence of a stronger association in autoantibody-positive patients with RA (OR 0.55, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.39,0.76) as compared with autoantibody-negative patients (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.41,1.99). Conclusion Statistically significant associations were observed between the response to anti-TNF therapy and an RA risk allele at the PTPRC gene locus. Additional studies will be required to replicate this finding in additional patient collections. [source] Management of nonresponse to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: Predictors and outcome of re-treatmentARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 5 2010E. M. Vital Objective A proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have disease that fails to respond to an initial cycle of rituximab. Using highly sensitive flow cytometry (HSFC), it has been shown that most patients who do not exhibit a response, as measured using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, have persistent circulating B cell levels at week 2 after initial treatment with rituximab. This study was undertaken to examine whether an additional cycle of rituximab would improve B cell depletion and clinical response in patients whose disease did not respond to the initial cycle. Methods Patients with RA (n = 158) were treated with a first cycle of rituximab (2 infusions of 1 gm each). Clinical responses were assessed using EULAR criteria, and patients were categorized as either first-cycle responders or first-cycle nonresponders. Baseline characteristics of first-cycle nonresponders (n = 38) and first-cycle responders (n = 65) with complete data were compared. First-cycle nonresponders (n = 25) were treated with a second cycle of rituximab at least 6 months after the first cycle. HSFC was performed at baseline, immediately prior to the second infusion (week 2), 1 month after the second infusion (week 6), and then every 3 months for each cycle of rituximab. Complete B cell depletion was defined as being <0.0001 × 109 cells/liter. Results At baseline, the number of preplasma cells was significantly higher in first-cycle nonresponders than in first-cycle responders (P = 0.003). Following the first infusion of the first cycle of rituximab, only 9% of first-cycle nonresponders (3 of 34) exhibited complete depletion of B-lineage cells, compared with 37% of first-cycle responders (22 of 59) (P = 0.007). Following the first infusion of the second cycle of rituximab, 38% of first-cycle nonresponders exhibited complete depletion. Twenty-six weeks after the second cycle, there was a significant improvement in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, with 72% of patients exhibiting a EULAR response. Conclusion RA patients whose disease did not respond to an initial cycle of rituximab have higher circulating preplasma cell numbers at baseline and incomplete depletion. Our findings indicate that an additional cycle of rituximab administered prior to total B cell repopulation enhances B cell depletion and clinical responses. [source] Association of the response to tumor necrosis factor antagonists with plasma type I interferon activity and interferon-,/, ratios in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A post hoc analysis of a predominantly Hispanic cohortARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 2 2010Clio P. Mavragani Objective Despite the substantial clinical efficacy of tumor necrosis factor , (TNF,) antagonist therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), some patients respond poorly to such agents. Since an interferon (IFN) signature is variably expressed among RA patients, we investigated whether plasma type I IFN activity might predict the response to TNF antagonist therapy. Methods RA patients (n = 35), the majority of whom were Hispanic, from a single center were evaluated before and after initiation of TNF antagonist therapy. As controls, 12 RA patients from the same center who were not treated with a TNF antagonist were studied. Plasma type I IFN activity was measured using a reporter cell assay, and disease status was assessed using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). Levels of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) were determined in baseline plasma samples using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The clinical response was classified according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria for improvement in RA. Results Plasma type I IFN activity at baseline was significantly associated with clinical response (odds ratio 1.36 [95% confidence interval 1.05,1.76], P = 0.020), with high baseline IFN activity associated with a good response. Changes in DAS28 scores were greater among patients with a baseline plasma IFN,/, ratio >0.8 (indicating elevated plasma IFN, levels). Consistent with the capacity of IFN, to induce IL-1Ra, elevated baseline IL-1Ra levels were associated with better therapeutic outcomes (odds ratio 1.82 [95% confidence interval 1.1,3.29], P = 0.027). Conclusion The plasma type I IFN activity, the IFN,/, ratio, and the IL-1Ra level were predictive of the therapeutic response in TNF antagonist,treated RA patients, indicating that these parameters might define clinically meaningful subgroups of RA patients with distinct responses to therapeutic agents. [source] Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: Results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registryARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 1 2010Merete Lund Hetland Objective To compare tumor necrosis factor , inhibitors directly regarding the rates of treatment response, remission, and the drug survival rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify clinical prognostic factors for response. Methods The nationwide DANBIO registry collects data on rheumatology patients receiving routine care. For the present study, we included patients from DANBIO who had RA (n = 2,326) in whom the first biologic treatment was initiated (29% received adalimumab, 22% received etanercept, and 49% received infliximab). Baseline predictors of treatment response were identified. The odds ratios (ORs) for clinical responses and remission and hazard ratios (HRs) for drug withdrawal were calculated, corrected for age, disease duration, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), seropositivity, concomitant methotrexate and prednisolone, number of previous disease-modifying drugs, center, and functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire score). Results Seventy percent improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (an ACR70 response) was achieved in 19% of patients after 6 months. Older age, concomitant prednisolone treatment, and low functional status at baseline were negative predictors. The ORs (95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) for an ACR70 response were 2.05 (95% CI 1.52,2.76) for adalimumab versus infliximab, 1.78 (95% CI 1.28,2.50) for etanercept versus infliximab, and 1.15 (95% CI 0.82,1.60) for adalimumab versus etanercept. Similar predictors and ORs were observed for a good response according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria, DAS28 remission, and Clinical Disease Activity Index remission. At 48 months, the HRs for drug withdrawal were 1.98 for infliximab versus etanercept (95% 1.63,2.40), 1.35 for infliximab versus adalimumab (95% CI 1.15,1.58), and 1.47 for adalimumab versus etanercept (95% CI 1.20,1.80). Conclusion Older age, low functional status, and concomitant prednisolone treatment were negative predictors of a clinical response and remission. Infliximab had the lowest rates of treatment response, disease remission, and drug adherence, adalimumab had the highest rates of treatment response and disease remission, and etanercept had the longest drug survival rates. These findings were consistent after correction for confounders and sensitivity analyses and across outcome measures and followup times. [source] Associations between the American College of Rheumatology pediatric response measures and the continuous measures of disease activity used in adult rheumatoid arthritis: A secondary analysis of clinical trial data from children with Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic ArthritisARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 12 2009Sarah Ringold Objective To measure associations between the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric criteria for improvement and the continuous measures of disease activity used for rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods In this retrospective analysis of 2 etanercept trials, disease activity was calculated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months using the Disease Activity Score (DAS), the DAS based on 28 joints (DAS28), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The ACR pediatric response and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response were also determined for the 3-month and 6-month evaluations. Data were analyzed in 94 patients with JIA independent of the treatment arm. Correlation coefficients between measures were calculated for each visit. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC of ROC) were calculated to assess the discriminative properties of the scores for the ACR pediatric response measures. Results The mean DAS, DAS28, CDAI score, and SDAI score were 3.7, 4.7, 30.8, and 36.4, respectively, at baseline, corresponding to high levels of disease activity (CDAI/SDAI) or moderate levels of disease activity (DAS/DAS28). At 3 months, the mean scores corresponded to low (DAS/DAS28) or moderate (CDAI/SDAI) disease activity. At 6 months, the mean scores corresponded to low disease activity (DAS/DAS28/CDAI) or moderate disease activity (SDAI). Most children met the criteria for a good or moderate EULAR response at 3 months and 6 months. The correlation between continuous outcome measures and each pediatric core set component was moderate to very good. The AUC of ROC values for each measure were high (range 0.76,0.98). Conclusion Good correlation and discriminative abilities were seen between the DAS, DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI for the ACR pediatric criteria for improvement. These disease activity measures may be useful for research and clinical care in polyarticular-course JIA. [source] Classification, presentation, and initial treatment of Wegener's granulomatosis in childhoodARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 11 2009David A. Cabral Objective To compare the criteria for Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) with those of the European League Against Rheumatism/Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (EULAR/PRES) in a cohort of children with WG and other antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA),associated vasculitides (AAVs), and to describe the interval to diagnosis, presenting features, and initial treatment for WG. Methods Eligible patients had been diagnosed by site rheumatologists (termed the "MD diagnosis") since 2004. This diagnosis was used as a reference standard for sensitivity and specificity testing of the 2 WG classification criteria. Descriptive analyses were confined to ACR-classified WG patients. Results MD diagnoses of 117 patients (82 of whom were female) were WG (n = 76), microscopic polyangiitis (n = 17), ANCA-positive pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (n = 5), Churg-Strauss syndrome (n = 2), and unclassified vasculitis (n = 17). The sensitivities of the ACR and EULAR/PRES classification criteria for WG among the spectrum of AAVs were 68.4% and 73.6%, respectively, and the specificities were 68.3% and 73.2%, respectively. Two more children were identified as having WG by the EULAR/PRES criteria than by the ACR criteria. For the 65 ACR-classified WG patients, the median age at diagnosis was 14.2 years (range 4,17 years), and the median interval from symptom onset to diagnosis was 2.7 months (range 0,49 months). The most frequent presenting features by organ system were constitutional (89.2%), pulmonary (80.0%), ear, nose, and throat (80.0%), and renal (75.4%). Fifty-four patients (83.1%) commenced treatment with the combination of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, with widely varying regimens; the remainder received methotrexate alone (n = 1), corticosteroids alone (n = 4), or a combination (n = 6). Conclusion The EULAR/PRES criteria minimally improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for WG among a narrow spectrum of children with AAVs. Diagnostic delays may result from poor characterization of childhood WG. Initial therapy varied considerably among participating centers. [source] Morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis patients with prolonged therapy-induced lymphopenia: Twelve-year outcomesARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 2 2008Alice R. Lorenzi Objective To assess immunologically relevant outcomes in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with prolonged therapy-induced lymphopenia. Methods Morbidity (infection or malignancy) and mortality were assessed in 53 RA patients who were treated with the lymphocytotoxic monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab between 1991 and 1994. Data were obtained by interview, medical record review, and Office for National Statistics mortality monitoring. Lymphocyte subsets were enumerated by flow cytometry. A retrospective, matched-cohort study of mortality was performed with 102 control subjects selected from the European League Against Rheumatism database of patients with rheumatic disorders. Results Lymphopenia persisted in the patients: median CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, CD19+, and CD56+ lymphocyte counts measured at a median followup of 11.8 years from the first administration of alemtuzumab were 0.50 × 109/liter, 0.26 × 109/liter, 0.11 × 109/liter, and 0.09 × 109/liter, respectively. Twenty-seven of 51 cases and 46 of 101 controls with available data had died, yielding a mortality rate ratio of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.72,1.98). Causes of death were similar to those that would be expected in a hospital-based RA cohort. No opportunistic infections were noted, and only 3 infections were documented following 36 elective orthopedic procedures. Conclusion Despite continued lymphopenia 11.8 years after therapy, our patient cohort did not exhibit excess mortality or unusual infection-related morbidity, and surgery was well tolerated. These data should be reassuring for clinicians and patients who are considering lymphocytotoxic or other immunomodulatory therapy for RA. [source] Fc, receptor type IIIA genotype and response to tumor necrosis factor ,,blocking agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritisARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 2 2007Alf Kastbom Objective To determine whether a functional single-nucleotide polymorphism in the gene encoding Fc, receptor type IIIA (Fc,RIIIA) correlates with the response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor , inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods The study population comprised 282 Swedish patients with RA in whom the therapeutic efficacy of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs had been insufficient. Infliximab or etanercept treatment was initiated, and patients were evaluated after 3 months, using the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), the ACR50, and the ACR70 or the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria. The chi-square test was used to compare response rates across Fc,RIIIA genotypes. Results No differences in genotype distribution were observed among nonresponders compared with ACR20 responders (P = 0.80), ACR50 responders (P = 0.56), or ACR70 responders (P = 0.91). Similar results were observed when analyzing infliximab and etanercept separately or when using the EULAR response criteria. Conclusion Unlike the findings of a previous study, the results of the current study suggest that the 158V/F polymorphism of Fc,RIIIA is very unlikely to influence the clinical efficacy of infliximab or etanercept in patients with RA. [source] Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti,tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeksARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2006Stanley B. Cohen Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to anti,tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies and to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in this population. Methods We evaluated primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA (REFLEX) Trial, a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of rituximab therapy. Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF agents were randomized to receive intravenous rituximab (1 course, consisting of 2 infusions of 1,000 mg each) or placebo, both with background MTX. The primary efficacy end point was a response on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points were responses on the ACR50 and ACR70 improvement criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 24 weeks. Additional end points included scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy,Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, as well as Genant-modified Sharp radiographic scores at 24 weeks. Results Patients assigned to placebo (n = 209) and rituximab (n = 311) had active, longstanding RA. At week 24, significantly more (P < 0.0001) rituximab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrated ACR20 (51% versus 18%), ACR50 (27% versus 5%), and ACR70 (12% versus 1%) responses and moderate-to-good EULAR responses (65% versus 22%). All ACR response parameters were significantly improved in rituximab-treated patients, who also had clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, disability, and health-related quality of life (demonstrated by FACIT-F, HAQ DI, and SF-36 scores, respectively) and showed a trend toward less progression in radiographic end points. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD20+ B cells, but the mean immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) remained within normal ranges. Most adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The rate of serious infections was 5.2 per 100 patient-years in the rituximab group and 3.7 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group. Conclusion At 24 weeks, a single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF therapies. [source] The LUNDEX, a new index of drug efficacy in clinical practice: Results of a five-year observational study of treatment with infliximab and etanercept among rheumatoid arthritis patients in southern SwedenARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 2 2006Lars Erik Kristensen Objective To describe the use of the LUNDEX, a new index for comparing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated in clinical practice. Methods Patients (n = 949) with active RA that had not responded to at least 2 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) including methotrexate, in whom biologic therapy was being initiated, were included in a structured clinical followup protocol. The protocol included collection of data on diagnosis, disease duration, previous and ongoing DMARD treatment, and dates on which biologic treatment was started and terminated. In addition, data on efficacy measures used for calculating validated response criteria, i.e., the European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria, were collected at fixed time points. Data were prospectively registered from March 1999 through January 2004. The LUNDEX, a new index combining the proportion of patients fulfilling a selected response criteria set with the proportion of patients adhering to a particular therapy, was designed to compare the efficacy of the different therapies. Results Etanercept had higher overall LUNDEX values compared with infliximab, mostly because of a lower rate of adherence to therapy with infliximab. The relationship between the drugs was consistent irrespective of the response criteria used. Conclusion The LUNDEX is a valuable tool for evaluating drug efficacy in observational studies. It has the advantage of integrating clinical response as well as adherence to therapy in a composite value. Moreover, the LUNDEX has a practical and potentially universal application independent of diagnosis and response criteria. [source] 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative,ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2010Daniel Aletaha Objective The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been criticized for their lack of sensitivity in early disease. This work was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for RA. Methods A joint working group from the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism developed, in 3 phases, a new approach to classifying RA. The work focused on identifying, among patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis, factors that best discriminated between those who were and those who were not at high risk for persistent and/or erosive disease,this being the appropriate current paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." Results In the new criteria set, classification as "definite RA" is based on the confirmed presence of synovitis in at least 1 joint, absence of an alternative diagnosis that better explains the synovitis, and achievement of a total score of 6 or greater (of a possible 10) from the individual scores in 4 domains: number and site of involved joints (score range 0,5), serologic abnormality (score range 0,3), elevated acute-phase response (score range 0,1), and symptom duration (2 levels; range 0,1). Conclusion This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features. This will refocus attention on the important need for earlier diagnosis and institution of effective disease-suppressing therapy to prevent or minimize the occurrence of the undesirable sequelae that currently comprise the paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." [source] The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological reportARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2010Tuhina Neogi Objective The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism have developed new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of Phase 2 of the development process was to achieve expert consensus on the clinical and laboratory variables that should contribute to the final criteria set. Methods Twenty-four expert RA clinicians (12 from Europe and 12 from North America) participated in Phase 2. A consensus-based decision analysis approach was used to identify factors (and their relative weights) that influence the probability of "developing RA," complemented by data from the Phase 1 study. Patient case scenarios were used to identify and reach consensus on factors important in determining the probability of RA development. Decision analytic software was used to derive the relative weights for each of the factors and their categories, using choice-based conjoint analysis. Results The expert panel agreed that the new classification criteria should be applied to individuals with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in whom at least 1 joint is deemed by an expert assessor to be swollen, indicating definite synovitis. In this clinical setting, they identified 4 additional criteria as being important: number of joints involved and site of involvement, serologic abnormality, acute-phase response, and duration of symptoms in the involved joints. These criteria were consistent with those identified in the Phase 1 data-driven approach. Conclusion The consensus-based, decision analysis approach used in Phase 2 complemented the Phase 1 efforts. The 4 criteria and their relative weights form the basis of the final criteria set. [source] The American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis: A game changer,ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2010Stanley Cohen No abstract is available for this article. [source] International rheumatology networking: The 2008 american college of rheumatology/european league against rheumatism exchange programARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 7 2009Axel J. Hueber No abstract is available for this article. [source] | ||||||||||