			Home About us Contact

Estimating Treatment Effects (estimating + treatment_effects)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Mathematics and Statistics	50%

Selected Abstracts

Estimating treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with non-compliance: the impact of maternal smoking on birthweight

HEALTH ECONOMICS, Issue 5 2001
Barton H. Hamilton
Abstract This paper assesses the causal impact of late-term (8th month) maternal smoking on birthweight using data from a randomized clinical trial, in which some women were encouraged not to smoke, while others were not. The estimation of treatment effects in this case is made difficult as a result of the presence of non-compliers, women who would not change their smoking status, regardless of the receipt of encouragement. Because these women are not at risk of changing treatment status, treatment effect distributions may be difficult to construct for them. Consequently, the paper focuses on obtaining the distribution of treatment impacts for the sub-set of compliers found in the data. Because compliance status is not observed for all subjects in the sample, a Bayesian finite mixture model is estimated that recovers the treatment effect parameters of interest. The complier average treatment effect implies that smokers give birth to infants weighing 348 g less than those of non-smokers, on average, although the 95% posterior density interval contains zero. The treatment effect is stronger for women who were moderate smokers prior to pregnancy, implying a birthweight difference of 430 g. However, the model predicts that only about 22% of the women in the sample were at risk of changing their smoking behaviour in response to encouragement to quit. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: an application to treatments of breast cancer patients

HEALTH ECONOMICS, Issue 11 2007
Anirban Basu
Abstract Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used in the health economics literature to adjust for hidden selection biases in observational studies when estimating treatment effects. Less attention has been paid in the applied literature to the proper use of IVs if treatment effects are heterogeneous across subjects and individuals select treatments based on expected idiosyncratic gains or losses from treatments. In this paper we compare conventional IV analysis with alternative approaches that use IVs to estimate treatment effects in models with response heterogeneity and self-selection. Instead of interpreting IV estimates as the effect of treatment at an unknown margin of patients, we identify the marginal patients and we apply the method of local IVs to estimate the average treatment effect and the effect on the treated on 5-year direct costs of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy compared with mastectomy in breast cancer patients. We use a sample from the Outcomes and Preferences in Older Women, Nationwide Survey which is designed to be representative of all female Medicare beneficiaries (aged 67 or older) with newly diagnosed breast cancer between 1992 and 1994. Our results reveal some of the advantages and limitations of conventional and alternative IV methods in estimating mean treatment effect parameters. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Some Methods of Propensity-Score Matching had Superior Performance to Others: Results of an Empirical Investigation and Monte Carlo simulations

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, Issue 1 2009
Peter C. Austin
Abstract Propensity-score matching is increasingly being used to reduce the impact of treatment-selection bias when estimating causal treatment effects using observational data. Several propensity-score matching methods are currently employed in the medical literature: matching on the logit of the propensity score using calipers of width either 0.2 or 0.6 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score; matching on the propensity score using calipers of 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.1; and 5 , 1 digit matching on the propensity score. We conducted empirical investigations and Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the relative performance of these competing methods. Using a large sample of patients hospitalized with a heart attack and with exposure being receipt of a statin prescription at hospital discharge, we found that the 8 different methods produced propensity-score matched samples in which qualitatively equivalent balance in measured baseline variables was achieved between treated and untreated subjects. Seven of the 8 propensity-score matched samples resulted in qualitatively similar estimates of the reduction in mortality due to statin exposure. 5 , 1 digit matching resulted in a qualitatively different estimate of relative risk reduction compared to the other 7 methods. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we found that matching using calipers of width of 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score and the use of calipers of width 0.02 and 0.03 tended to have superior performance for estimating treatment effects (© 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) [source]

Utilizing Propensity Scores to Estimate Causal Treatment Effects with Censored Time-Lagged Data

BIOMETRICS, Issue 4 2001
Kevin J. Anstrom
Summary. Observational studies frequently are conducted to compare long-term effects of treatments. Without randomization, patients receiving one treatment are not guaranteed to be prognostically comparable to those receiving another treatment. Furthermore, the response of interest may be right-censored because of incomplete follow-up. Statistical methods that do not account for censoring and confounding may lead to biased estimates. This article presents a method for estimating treatment effects in nonrandomized studies with right-censored responses. We review the assumptions required to estimate average causal effects and derive an estimator for comparing two treatments by applying inverse weights to the complete cases. The weights are determined according to the estimated probability of receiving treatment conditional on covariates and the estimated treatment-specific censoring distribution. By utilizing martingale representations, the estimator is shown to be asymptotically normal and an estimator for the asymptotic variance is derived. Simulation results are presented to evaluate the properties of the estimator. These methods are applied to an observational data set of acute coronary syndrome patients from Duke University Medical Center to estimate the effect of a treatment strategy on the mean 5-year medical cost. [source]