Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Esophageal Injury (esophageal + injury)
Selected AbstractsRandomized Comparison Between Open Irrigation Technology and Intracardiac-Echo-Guided Energy Delivery for Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation: Procedural Parameters, Outcomes, and the Effect on Esophageal InjuryJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 6 2007NASSIR F. MARROUCHE M.D. Introduction: We performed a prospective study to compare efficacy and safety of both open irrigation tip (OIT) technology with intracardiac echo (ICE)-guided energy delivery in patients presenting for PVAI. Methods and Results: Fifty-three patients presenting for PVAI were randomized to ablation using an OIT catheter (Group 1, 26 patients; temperature and power were set at 50° and 50 W, respectively, with a saline pump flow rate of 30 mL/min) or radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery under ICE guidance (Group 2, 27 patients; energy was titrated based on microbubbles formation). The mean procedure time and fluoroscopy exposure were lower in Group 1 (164 ± 42 min and 7,560 ± 2,298 ,Graym2 vs 204 ± 47 min and 12,240 ± 4,356 ,Graym2; P = 0.005 and 0.008, respectively). Moreover, the durations of RF lesions applied per PV antrum was lower in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (5.1 ± 2.2 min vs 9.2 ± 3.2 min, P = 0.03, respectively). Within 24 hours after PVAI in 35.7% (all erythema) of Group 1 and 57.1% (21.4% erythema and 35.7% necrosis) of Group 2, patients' esophageal wall changes were documented. After 14 ± 2 months of follow up, recurrences were documented in 19.2% of Group 1 and 22.2% of Group 2 patients. Conclusion: Although both OIT and ICE-guided energy delivery possess a similar effect in treating AF, OIT seems to be superior in terms of achieving isolation and shortening fluoroscopy exposure. Moreover, a lower incidence of esophageal wall injury was observed utilizing OIT for PVAI. [source] Capsule Endoscopy in Examination of Esophagus for Lesions After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Potential Tool to Select Patients With Increased Risk of ComplicationsJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2010LUIGI DI BIASE M.D. Capsule Endoscopy in Examination of Esophagus.,Background: Esophageal injury can result from left atrial radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy, with added concern because of its possible relationship to the development of atrial-esophageal (A-E) fistulas. Objective: Evaluate utility of esophageal capsule endoscopy to detect esophageal lesions as a complication of RFA therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Consecutive patients with AF who underwent left atrial RFA therapy and received capsule endoscopy within 48 hours postablation. Video was reviewed by a single gastroenterologist. The medical records were also reviewed for symptoms immediately postablation and at the 3-month follow-up. Results: A total of 93 consecutive patients were included and 88 completed the study and were analyzed. The prevalence of esophageal lesions was 17% (15/88 patients). Nine percent (8/88) of these patients had lesions anatomically consistent with the location of the ablation catheter. Six patients with positive capsule findings had symptoms of chest pain (3/6, 50%), throat pain (2/6, 33%), nausea (1/6, 17%), and abdominal pain (1/6, 17%). An additional 24 patients were symptomatic postablation, but with normal capsule findings. All patients with identified lesions by capsule endoscopy received oral proton pump inhibitor therapy, and were instructed to contact the Cleveland Clinic in the event of worsening symptoms. No delayed complications were reported at the 3-month follow-up. Conclusion: This study supports the use of capsule endoscopy as a tool for the detection of esophageal injury post-RFA therapy. PillCam ESO is well tolerated and provides satisfactory images of the areas of interest in the esophagus without potential risk related to insufflation with regular esophagogastroduodenoscopy. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 839-844, August 2010) [source] Reflux injury of esophageal mucosa: experimental studies in animal models of esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinomaDISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 5 2007Yan Li SUMMARY., Barrett's esophagus (BE), a gastroesophageal reflux associated complication, is defined as the replacement of normal esophageal squamous mucosa by specialized intestinal columnar mucosa with the appearance of goblet cells. The presence of BE is associated with an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Although the exposure of gastroduodenal contents to the esophageal mucosa is considered to be an important risk factor for the development of esophagitis, BE and EAC, the mechanisms of reflux esophageal injury are not fully understood. Animal models are now being used extensively to identify the mechanisms of damage and to devise protective and mitigating strategies. Experimental studies on animal models by mimicking the processing of gastroesophageal reflux injury have bloomed during the past decades, however, there is controversy regarding which experimental model for reflux esophagitis, experimental BE and experimental EAC is best. In this review article we aim to clarify the basic understanding of gastroesophageal reflux injury and its complications of BE and EAC, as well as to present current understanding of the reflux experimental models. The animal models of experimental esophageal injury are summarized with focus on the surgical procedures to guide the investigator in choosing or developing a correct animal model in future studies. In addition, our own experimental studies of the animal models are also briefly discussed. [source] Prevalence of Fever in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Barium EsophagraphyJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 8 2009RUBINDER S. RUBY M.D. Background: Real-time esophageal imaging is critical in avoiding esophageal injury. However, the safety of esophageal imaging with barium has not been specifically explored. Methods: Three hundred seventy consecutive patients underwent left atrial (LA) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) under conscious sedation. One hundred eighty-five patients (50%) underwent the ablation procedure with, and 185 patients (50%) underwent the procedure without administration of barium. Fever, as a surrogate for aspiration, was defined as a maximal temperature ,100°F within the first 24 hours following the ablation procedure. Results: Thirty of the 370 patients (8%) developed fever within 24 hours after LA ablation. The prevalence of fever was 9% (17/185) among patients who received barium and 7% (13/185) among those who did not receive barium (P = 0.6). Evaluation revealed the following causes of fever in 14 of the 30 patients (47%) with no difference in prevalence between the 2 groups: pericarditis, venous thromboembolism, hematoma, and infiltrate on chest radiography. Multivariate analysis failed to reveal any factors associated with development of fever. None of the patients experienced serious complications such as respiratory failure or atrioesophageal fistula. Conclusions: Fever may occur in approximately 10% of patients undergoing LA ablation of AF. Administration of barium is not associated with fever or other complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Real-time imaging of the esophagus with barium administration in conjunction with conscious sedation appears to be safe. [source] Esophageal Hematoma Complicating Catheter Ablation for Atrial FibrillationJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2009REBECCA McCALL B.V.C.Des Significant injury to the esophagus during ablation for atrial fibrillation is rare but may be devastating. Esophageal fistulas and injury to branches of the vagus nerve resulting in gastric stasis have previously been described. In this case report, we describe another type of esophageal injury associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. The patient experienced chest pain and vomiting on recovery from anesthesia. Echocardiography and computerized tomography were used to identify a large esophageal hematoma. The hematoma was treated conservatively and the patient recovered fully after several weeks. [source] Real-Time Monitoring of Luminal Esophageal Temperature During Left Atrial Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Observations About Esophageal Heating During Ablation at the Pulmonary Vein Ostia and Posterior Left AtriumJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2006CHRISTIAN PERZANOWSKI M.D. Introduction: Left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) is gaining acceptance as treatment for drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). This therapy has been associated with esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation causing death. Methods: We describe 3 patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF during real-time monitoring of luminal esophageal temperature. Results: We observed heating of the esophagus during short duration low power RFA, at either the left or right pulmonary vein ostia. Cryoablation at the pulmonary vein ostium in one patient resulted in esophageal cooling. Furthermore, we observed that fluoroscopic localization of the ablation catheter at a site apparently distant from the esophagus is not adequate to assure avoidance of ablation-induced esophageal heating. Conclusions: Real-time monitoring of luminal esophageal position and temperature is feasible, enhances recognition of esophageal heating, and may add useful information beyond that provided by fluoroscopic assessment of esophageal position. There is a potential role for esophageal monitoring to help avoid thermal injury to the esophagus during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. [source] Carbon Dioxide Laser Endoscopic Diverticulotomy Versus Open Diverticulectomy for Zenker's Diverticulum ,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 3 2004C. W. David Chang MD Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis To compare open and CO2 laser,assisted endoscopic surgical management of Zenker's diverticulum. Study Design A retrospective review of 49 consecutive surgically treated patients with Zenker's diverticulum was conducted. Methods Patients' records were reviewed and analyzed for patient age and sex, size of diverticulum, incision time (time recorded from start of incision to surgical completion of case), length of hospital stay, complications, and follow-up management. A postoperative questionnaire inquiring about swallow function was conducted by mail or telephone. Swallow function was assessed on a four-point scale. Results Various procedures performed included endoscopic CO2 laser,assisted diverticulotomy (n = 24) and open diverticulectomy with cricopharyngeal myotomy (n = 28). The average incision time of laser endoscopic cases (47 min) was significantly shorter (P < .001) than that of open diverticulectomy cases (170 min). Length of hospital stay did not significantly vary between the two groups. Five patients (21%) initially treated with laser endoscopic diverticulotomy demonstrated symptomatic persistent Zenker's diverticulum; three underwent repeat operation. No open cases required repeat operation. One endoscopic case was aborted secondary to esophageal injury from placement of the endoscope. Postoperative fever was seen in two (8%) endoscopic cases and four (14%) open approach cases. No major complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, mediastinitis, or death) were encountered. More than 90% of respondents in each treatment group reported normal or near-normal swallow function. Conclusion Laser endoscopic management is a reasonable and safe method for surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum in comparison with the open technique. Employment of the endoscopic approach reduces operative time and the complexity of postoperative care. Practitioners should be aware that the endoscopic approach may result in a higher failure rate. [source] | ||||||||||