Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Epigastric Artery (epigastric + artery)
Kinds of Epigastric Artery Selected AbstractsSimultaneous use of bilateral caudal superficial epigastric axial pattern flaps for wound closure in a dogJOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, Issue 12 2003P. D. Mayhew A neutered male German shorthaired pointer sustained severe bite wounds to the left caudal flank and thigh area. Thorough wound lavage and debrldement was performed immediately and also three days after presentation. Daily wound dressing resulted in the production of a mature granulation tissue bed. Prior to wound closure, colour flow Doppler ultrasonography was used to confirm blood flow through the right and left caudal superficial epigastric arteries and veins. Sixteen days after presentation, right and left caudal superficial epigastric axial pattern flaps were simultaneously elevated to cover the defect. The right flap was elevated as an island flap, rotated 120° and used to cover the caudodorsal aspect of the defect. The left flap was elevated and rotated dorsally to cover the cranioventral aspect of the defect. Ninety per cent wound coverage was achieved and flap survival was total. The donor site defect was closed primarily and no dehiscence occurred. Three months postsurgery, the entire defect was closed and limb function was normal. [source] Improvement of radiation-induced healing delay by etanercept treatment in rat arteriesCANCER SCIENCE, Issue 8 2009Kenji Sugiyama Surgical treatment often causes difficulty in the irradiated field because of delayed wound healing, which is mainly due to vascular dysfunction. To overcome this difficulty, we attempted to accelerate the recovery from clamp injury in irradiated superficial epigastric arteries of rats as a model. Etanercept, a soluble receptor of tumor necrosis factor-,, was administered four times to rats with irradiated arteries before and after clamp injury. Loss of endothelial cells and necrosis of the media in the irradiated arteries continued for more than 1 week after the injury; however, in the rats treated with etanercept, the endothelial cells recovered in the intima, and ,-smooth muscle actin-positive smooth muscle cells recovered in the injured and irradiated arteries. After clamp injury of common carotid arteries that had previously been irradiated, the blood flow in these arteries was visualized by magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. The time-of-flight signal was weakened in the injured and irradiated arteries. This time-of-flight signal was recovered by the etanercept treatment. These findings suggest that etanercept improves the radiation-impaired healing of arteries in rats. (Cancer Sci 2009) [source] Breast reconstruction using perforator flapsJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 6 2006Jay W. Granzow MD Abstract Background Perforator flaps allow the transfer of the patient's own skin and fat in a reliable manner with minimal donor-site morbidity. The deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps transfer the same tissue from the abdomen to the chest for breast reconstruction as the TRAM flap without sacrificing the rectus muscle or fascia. Gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps allow transfer of tissue from the buttock, also with minimal donor-site morbidity. Indications Most women requiring tissue transfer to the chest for breast reconstruction or other reasons are candidates for perforator flaps. Absolute contraindications to perforator flap breast reconstruction include history of previous liposuction of the donor site or active smoking (within 1 month prior to surgery). Anatomy and Technique The DIEP flap is supplied by intramuscular perforators from the deep inferior epigastric artery and vein. The SIEA flap is based on the SIEA and vein, which arise from the common femoral artery and saphenous bulb. GAP flaps are based on perforators from either the superior or inferior gluteal artery. During flap harvest, these perforators are meticulously dissected free from the surrounding muscle which is spread in the direction of the muscle fibers and preserved intact. The pedicle is anastomosed to recipient vessels in the chest and the donor site is closed without the use of mesh or other materials. Conclusions Perforator flaps allow the safe and reliable transfer of abdominal tissue for breast reconstruction. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;94:441,454. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] A single center comparison of one versus two venous anastomoses in 564 consecutive DIEP flaps: Investigating the effect on venous congestion and flap survival,MICROSURGERY, Issue 3 2010Morteza Enajat M.D. Background: Venous complications have been reported as the more frequently encountered vascular complications seen in the transfer of deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flaps, with a variety of techniques described for augmenting the venous drainage of these flaps to minimize venous congestion. The benefits of such techniques have not been shown to be of clinical benefit on a large scale due to the small number of cases in published series. Methods: A retrospective study of 564 consecutive DIEP flaps at a single institution was undertaken, comparing the prospective use of one venous anastomosis (273 cases) to two anastomoses (291 cases). The secondary donor vein comprised a second DIEA venae commitante in 7.9% of cases and a superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) in 92.1%. Clinical outcomes were assessed, in particular rates of venous congestion. Results: The use of two venous anastomoses resulted in a significant reduction in the number of cases of venous congestion to zero (0 vs. 7, P = 0.006). All other outcomes were similar between groups. Notably, the use of a secondary vein did not result in any significant increase in operative time (385 minutes vs. 383 minutes, P = 0.57). Conclusions: The use of a secondary vein in the drainage of a DIEP flap can significantly reduce the incidence of venous congestion, with no detriment to complication rates. Consideration of incorporating both the superficial and deep venous systems is an approach that may further improve the venous drainage of the flap. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010. [source] A subfascial variant of the deep inferior epigastric artery demonstrated by preoperative multidetector computed tomographic angiography: A case reportMICROSURGERY, Issue 2 2010Cristina Garusi M.D. Precise preoperative imaging by multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography for planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap dissection has been reported for enormous advantages in terms of reduced operative time and minimized flap-related complications. This case report shows a particularly rare anatomical subfascia variant of deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) which can be preoperatively demonstrated by MDCT angiogram. Therefore, the intraoperative finding also confirms the radiologic data and results in meticulous flap harvesting during incision on anterior rectus sheath. Additionally, the authors emphasize on performing preoperative high quality imaging for DIEP intervention precisely for specific vulnerable course of subfascial plane DIEP, which is rare but tends to be at risk without foreknowing its exact course. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010. [source] The perforator angiosome: A new concept in the design of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps for breast reconstructionMICROSURGERY, Issue 1 2010B.Med.Sc., P.G.Dip.Surg.Anat., Ph.D., Warren M. Rozen M.B.B.S. Background: The previously described "perfusion zones" of the abdominal wall vasculature are based on filling of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and all its branches simultaneously. With the advent of the DIEA perforator flap, only a single or several perforators are included in supply to the flap. As such, a new model for abdominal wall perfusion has become necessary. The concept of a "perforator angiosome" is thus explored. Methods: A clinical and cadaveric study of 155 abdominal walls was undertaken. This comprised the use of 10 whole, unembalmed cadaveric abdominal walls for angiographic studies, and 145 abdominal wall computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) in patients undergoing preoperative imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature. The evaluation of the subcutaneous branching pattern and zone of perfusion of individual DIEA perforators was explored, particularly exploring differences between medial and lateral row perforators. Results: Fundamental differences exist between medial row and lateral row perforators, with medial row perforators larger (1.3 mm vs. 1 mm) and more likely to ramify in the subcutaneous fat toward the contralateral hemiabdomen (98% of cases vs. 2% of cases). A model for the perfusion of the abdominal wall based on a single perforator is presented. Conclusion: The "perforator angiosome" is dependent on perforator location, and can mapped individually with the use of preoperative imaging. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010. [source] Establishing the case for CT angiography in the preoperative imaging of abdominal wall perforatorsMICROSURGERY, Issue 5 2008BMedSc, PGDipSurgAnat, W. M. Rozen MBBS Preoperative imaging of the donor site vasculature for deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator flaps and other abdominal wall reconstructive flaps has become more commonplace. Abdominal wall computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been described as the most accurate and reproducible modality available for demonstrating the location, size, and course of individual perforators. We drew on our experience of 75 consecutive patients planned for DIEA-based flap surgery undertaking CTA at a single institution. Seven of these cases have been reported to highlight the utility of CTA for preoperative planning, emphasizing the unique information supplied by CTA that may influence operative outcome. Among all cases that underwent preoperative imaging with CTA, there was 100% flap survival, with no partial or complete flap necrosis. We found that in three of the cases described, the choice of operation was necessarily selected based on CTA findings (DIEA perforator flap, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, and superficial superior epigastric artery flap). In addition, three cases demonstrate that CTA findings may dictate the decision to operate at all, and one case demonstrates the utility of CTA for evaluating the entire abdominal contents for comorbid conditions. Our experience with CTA for abdominal wall perforator mapping has been highly beneficial. CTA may guide operative technique and improve perforator selection in uncomplicated cases, and in difficult cases it can guide the most appropriate operation or indeed if an operation is appropriate at all. This is particularly the case in the setting of comorbidities or previous abdominal surgery. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2008. [source] Effects of Tisseel and FloSeal on Primary Ischemic Time in a Rat Fasciocutaneous Free Flap Model,THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 2 2004Aaron W. Partsafas BS Abstract Objectives: Free flaps are the technique of choice for reconstruction of defects resulting from extirpation of tumors of the head and neck. Advances in microsurgical technique have resulted in success rates of greater than 95%. Numerous intraoperative factors, ranging from technical issues to topically applied agents, can complicate the outcome of microsurgical free tissue transfer. Synthetic tissue adhesives and hemostatic agents are playing an ever-increasing role in reconstructive surgery. The safety of these factors in free flap surgery has not been ascertained. Study Design: Animal Care Committee live rat model. Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups: group I, Control; group 2, FloSeal; group 3, Tisseel. In each group, a 3 × 6 cm ventral fasciocutaneous groin flap based on the left superficial epigastric artery was elevated and the experimental material applied beneath the flap and around the flap pedicle prior to suturing of the flap back to the wound bed. The experimental materials consisted of 0.2 mL saline in the control group, 0.5 mL FloSeal, and 0.2 mL Tisseel. In phase I of this study, the effect of each treatment on flap survival was assessed by survival at postoperative day 4. In phase II of the study, the effects of these agents on ischemic tolerance was investigated. Five rats in each treatment group were exposed to ischemic times of 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours. Survival of the flap was assessed 7 days after reversal of the ischemia. Probit curves and the critical ischemic time (CIT50) were calculated. Results: All flaps survived the 2-hour period of ischemia and were viable at postoperative day 4. Flap survival from group 1 (Control), group 2 (FloSeal), and group 3 (Tisseel) at the various ischemic times was as follows: at 6 hours, 80%, 80%, and 80%, respectively; at 8 hours, 80%, 80%, 60%; at 10 hours, 60%, 33%, 40%; at 12 hours, 20%, 20%, 0%. The CIT50 for the Control, FloSeal, and Tisseel groups was 9.4, 9.0, and 7.0 hours, respectively. Conclusions: FloSeal, a thrombin-based hemostatic agent, and Tisseel, a fibrin glue, displayed no adverse effect on flap survival in this model. [source] The branching pattern of the deep inferior epigastric artery revisited in-vivo: A new classification based on CT angiographyCLINICAL ANATOMY, Issue 1 2010Warren M. Rozen Abstract The deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) is a reliable pedicle in the design of DIEA perforator flaps, with variations in its anatomy infrequent. Previous studies describing its branching pattern have all been based on cadaveric anatomy and described the following three branching patterns: Type 1 (single trunk), Type 2 (bifurcating trunk), and Type 3 (trifurcating trunk). The increased use of preoperative imaging, particularly with computed tomographic angiography (CTA), has enabled visualization of the DIEA and its branches in vivo, providing a functional view of this anatomy. We undertook a study of 250 patients (500 hemiabdominal walls) undergoing preoperative CTA before DIEA perforator flaps for breast reconstruction. The branching pattern of the DIEA and correlation to the contralateral hemiabdominal wall were assessed. The branching patterns of the DIEA were found to be different in vivo compared with cadaveric studies, with a higher than previously reported incidence of Type 1 patterns and lower than reported incidence of Type 3 patterns, and that some patterns exist which were not included within the previous nomenclature (namely, Type 0 or absent DIEA and Type 4 or four-trunk DIEA). There was also shown to be no overall concordance in the branching patterns of the DIEA between contralateral sides of the same abdominal wall; however, there was shown to be a statistically significant concordance in cases of a Type 1 DIEA (51% concordance, P = 0.04). As such, a new modification to the classification system for the branching pattern of the DIEA is presented based on imaging findings. Clin. Anat. 23:87,92, 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Reviewing the vascular supply of the anterior abdominal wall: Redefining anatomy for increasingly refined surgeryCLINICAL ANATOMY, Issue 2 2008W.M. Rozen Abstract The abdominal wall integument is becoming the standard donor tissue for postmastectomy breast reconstruction, with its vascular supply of key importance to the reconstructive surgeon. Refinements in tissue transfer, from pedicled to free flaps and musculocutaneous to perforator flaps, have required increasing understanding of finer levels of this vascular anatomy. The widespread utilization of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator flap, particularly for breast reconstruction, has rekindled clinical interest in further levels of anatomical detail, in particular the location and course of the musculocutaneous perforators of the DIEA. Advances in operative techniques, and anatomical and imaging technologies, have facilitated an increase in this understanding. The current review comprises an appraisal of both the anatomical and clinical literature, with a view to highlighting the key anatomical features of the abdominal wall vasculature as related to reconstructive flaps. Clin. Anat. 21:89,98, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||