Home About us Contact | |||
Endovascular Procedures (endovascular + procedure)
Selected AbstractsMigraine With Aura After Intracranial Endovascular ProceduresHEADACHE, Issue 4 2001R. Beekman MD Objective.,To describe three cases of migraine (two with aura) after an intracranial endovascular procedure. Method.,Retrospective. Results.,One patient had an attack of migraine with prolonged aura after embolization of a dural arteriovenous fistula. Another patient had an attack of migraine with aura (and hemiparesis) after a diagnostic angiogram. The third patient already suffered from migraine with aura and had a migraine attack after embolization of an occipital arteriovenous malformation. A quadrantanopia persisted in this patient. Outcome of the other two patients was good. Conclusion.,Intracranial endovascular procedures can induce migraine with aura. We could not identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, but mechanical, chemical, immunological, or hemodynamic factors could be involved. [source] Comparison of extra-anatomic bypass grafting with angioplasty for atherosclerotic disease of the supra-aortic trunksBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 11 2004B. Modarai Background: Symptomatic stenosis of the supra-aortic trunks (subclavian, innominate and common carotid arteries) can be treated by angioplasty/stenting or surgical bypass. The aim of this study was to compare the initial success and outcome of these two types of treatment. Methods: A prospective database was used to collect information on the presentation, initial success, complications and outcome in 76 patients treated in a single centre between 1983 and 2003. Results: Thirty-five surgical extra-anatomic bypasses were performed, 13 carotid to carotid, 14 carotid to subclavian, two carotid to axillary, three axillary to axillary, one subclavian to axillary and two subclavian to subclavian. One graft occluded after 19 years. No limbs were amputated and no patient had a stroke. The secondary patency rate was 97 per cent at a mean follow-up of 5 years. Forty-one angioplasties were attempted, 34 of the left subclavian, six of the right subclavian and one of the innominate artery. Angioplasty for six subclavian occlusions was unsuccessful. Twenty-seven of 33 arteries remained patent at a mean follow-up of 4 years after a successful endovascular procedure. Conclusion: Extra-anatomic bypass for supra-aortic trunk disease has a better patency than angioplasty, with a comparable complication rate. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Migraine With Aura After Intracranial Endovascular ProceduresHEADACHE, Issue 4 2001R. Beekman MD Objective.,To describe three cases of migraine (two with aura) after an intracranial endovascular procedure. Method.,Retrospective. Results.,One patient had an attack of migraine with prolonged aura after embolization of a dural arteriovenous fistula. Another patient had an attack of migraine with aura (and hemiparesis) after a diagnostic angiogram. The third patient already suffered from migraine with aura and had a migraine attack after embolization of an occipital arteriovenous malformation. A quadrantanopia persisted in this patient. Outcome of the other two patients was good. Conclusion.,Intracranial endovascular procedures can induce migraine with aura. We could not identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanism, but mechanical, chemical, immunological, or hemodynamic factors could be involved. [source] An Enhanced Device for Transluminal Retrieval of Vascular Stents Without Surgical Procedures: Experimental StudiesJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2010MASAYUKI TSUCHIDA M.D. Background: Although efforts have been focused on developing endovascular procedures by which intravascular devices such as stents could be effectively deployed, few data exist regarding devices for the nonsurgical retrieval of deployed stents. Therefore, we designed to enable retrieval of deployed stents without a surgical procedure. Methods: The device consisted of four components: ultra-low profile forceps with 2.0 mm in diameter, conducting shaft with 1.8 mm in diameter, control handle by which the forceps is opened or closed, and a covering sheath. This device was designed to advance into the vessel lumen along a 0.014-inch guidewire by over the wire fashion. Results: The forceps could firmly catch nonexpanded as well as expanded tubular-type stents with open cells in an in vitro model that was 4.0 mm in diameter. Then, we used this device in porcine renal arteries with 2.5,5.0 mm in diameter. At first, a fragmented 0.014-inch guidewire could be safely removed without vessel damage that was confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. This device could successfully remove four of five inappropriately and 11 of 14 appropriately deployed stents. Under these conditions, intravascular ultrasound demonstrated minor vessel wall dissection in two-third of cases. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the present device can be used for transluminal removal of foreign bodies such as nonexpanded as well as expanded stents in acute phase. Further miniaturization may enable using this type of device in the renal as well as coronary arteries. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:264,270) [source] Endovascular Interventions in Iliac and Infrainguinal Occlusive Artery DiseaseJOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 6 2004JOHANNES RUEF M.D., M.Sc. Percutaneous endovascular procedures are increasingly applied to treat symptomatic peripheral occlusive artery disease. While the primary technical success and recanalization rates in iliac and infrainguinal interventions are high, differences in the long-term patency rates exist with respect to the anatomic localization, separating the iliac, femoropopliteal, and infrapopliteal arterial regions. In iliac arteries, even complex lesions can be recanalized with good long-term patency rates, especially when using self-expanding nitinol stents. In the infrainguinal arteries the method of choice is still under debate (e.g., balloon angioplasty vs stent implantation). A high restenosis rate represents one of the major limitations in femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. Therefore, additional methods and treatment strategies for peripheral interventions with the potential for future applications are under investigation and will be discussed such as drug-eluting stents, brachytherapy, subintimal angioplasty, laser angioplasty, atherectomy/thrombectomy, cutting balloon, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent grafts, biodegradable stents, and cryoplasty. The increasing amount of data on successful peripheral interventions supports the necessity to adapt and reevaluate the current consensus guidelines that were put together in 2000. [source] Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosisANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 3 2010Omar Khan MD A chronic state of impaired venous drainage from the central nervous system, termed chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), is claimed to be a pathologic phenomenon exclusively seen in multiple sclerosis (MS). This has invigorated the causal debate of MS and generated immense interest in the patient and scientific communities. A potential shift in the treatment paradigm of MS involving endovascular balloon angioplasty or venous stent placement has been proposed as well as conducted in small patient series. In some cases, it may have resulted in serious injury. In this Point of View, we discuss the recent investigations that led to the description of CCSVI as well as the conceptual and technical shortcomings that challenge the potential relationship of this phenomenon to MS. The need for conducting carefully designed and rigorously controlled studies to investigate CCVSI has been recognized by the scientific bodies engaged in MS research. Several scientific endeavors examining the presence of CCSVI in MS are being undertaken. At present, invasive and potentially dangerous endovascular procedures as therapy for patients with MS should be discouraged until such studies have been completed, analyzed, and debated in the scientific arena. ANN NEUROL 2010;67:286,290 [source] The safety and efficacy of an extravascular, water-soluble sealant for vascular closure: Initial clinical results for MynxÔCATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 5 2007D. Scheinert MD Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy and safety of the Mynx extravascular sealant for femoral artery closure. Background: The Mynx device is an extra-arterial vascular closure technology utilizing a water-soluble, porous, polyethylene glycol matrix that immediately seals the arteriotomy by rapidly absorbing subcutaneous fluids and expanding in the tissue tract and then, resorbs within 30 days. Methods: The Mynx study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical investigation conducted at five European centers. The safety and effectiveness of the Mynx device was evaluated in patients following diagnostic or interventional endovascular procedures performed through 5 Fr, 6 Fr, or 7 Fr introducer sheaths in the common femoral artery. The primary safety endpoint was the combined rate of major complications within 30 days (±7 days). The primary efficacy endpoints were time to hemostasis and time to ambulation. Results: Patient enrollment included 190 patients with 50% having undergone diagnostic catheterization and 50% interventional procedures with a mean activated clotting time of 221 sec. One (0.5%) major vascular complication (transfusion) occurred in one patient. No device-precipitated complications associated with serious clinical sequelae were reported. Mean (± standard deviation) times to hemostasis and ambulation were 1.3 ± 2.3 min and 2.6 ± 2.6 hr, respectively. There was no significant difference in median times to hemostasis between diagnostic and interventional patients (0.5 vs. 0.6 min). Conclusions: The initial experience with the extra-arterial Mynx closure technology supports hemostatic safety and efficacy in patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional catheterization procedures. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |